New tools and emerging technologies for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: Part II. Active tuberculosis and drug resistance

References

• Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N et al. The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch. Intern. Med.163(9), 1009–1021 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis control. Surveillance, Planning, Financing. WHO Report 2005. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1–247 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Foulds J, O’Brien R. New tools for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: the perspective of developing countries. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.2(10), 778–783 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins MD. New diagnostic tools for tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.4(12 Suppl. 2), S182–S188 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Perkins MD, Small PM. Admitting defeat. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.10(1), 1 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher M. Diagnosis of MDR-TB: a developing world problem on a developed world budget. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.2(2), 151–159 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodie D, Schluger NW. The diagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin. Chest Med.26(2), 247–271, vi (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M. The accuracy and reliability of nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Natl Med. J. India17(5), 233–236 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Thoracic Society. Rapid diagnostic tests for tuberculosis: what is the appropriate use? American Thoracic Society Workshop. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.155(5), 1804–1814 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Flores LL, Pai M, Colford JM Jr, Riley LW. In-house nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens: meta-analysis and meta-regression. BMC Microbiol.5, 55 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M, Flores LL, Hubbard A, Riley LW, Colford JM Jr. Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis.4(1), 6 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M, Flores LL, Pai N et al. Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis.3(10), 633–643 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piersimoni C, Scarparo C. Relevance of commercial amplification methods for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples. J. Clin. Microbiol.41(12), 5355–5365 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarmiento OL, Weigle KA, Alexander J, Weber DJ, Miller WC. Assessment by meta-analysis of PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.41(7), 3233–3240 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwamoto T, Sonobe T, Hayashi K. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. J. Clin. Microbiol.41(6), 2616–2622 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennaro ML. Immunologic diagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.30(Suppl. 3), S243–S246 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel TM. Antibody and antigen detection for the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: why not? What more is needed? Where do we stand today? J. Infect. Dis.158(4), 678–680 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bothamley GH. Serological diagnosis of tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. Suppl.20, 676s–688s (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Chan ED, Heifets L, Iseman MD. Immunologic diagnosis of tuberculosis: a review. Tuber. Lung Dis.80(3), 131–140 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laal S, Skeiky YAW. Immune-based methods. In: Tuberculosis and the Tubercle Bacillus. Cole ST, Eisenach KD, McMurray DN, Jacobs WR Jr (Eds), ASM Press, DC, USA, 71–83 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Davidow A, Kanaujia GV, Shi L et al. Antibody profiles characteristic of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection state. Infect. Immun.73(10), 6846–6851 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennaro ML. Serologic tests for TB: is there hope? Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.9(11), S18 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Pereira Arias-Bouda LM, Nguyen LN, Ho LM et al. Development of antigen detection assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis using sputum samples. J. Clin. Microbiol.38(6), 2278–2283 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boehme C, Molokova E, Minja F et al. Detection of mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan with an antigen-capture ELISA in unprocessed urine of Tanzanian patients with suspected tuberculosis. Trans. R Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.99(12), 893–900 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harboe M, Nagai S, Patarroyo ME et al. Properties of proteins MPB64, MPB70, and MPB80 of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect. Immun.52(1), 293–302 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura RM, Velmonte MA, Kawajiri K et al. MPB64 mycobacterial antigen: a new skin-test reagent through patch method for rapid diagnosis of active tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.2(7), 541–546 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura RM, Einck L, Velmonte MA et al. Detection of active tuberculosis by an MPB-64 transdermal patch: a field study. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.33(6), 405–407 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geisbrecht BV, Nikonenko B, Samala R et al. Design and optimization of a recombinant system for large-scale production of the MPT64 antigen from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Protein Expr. Purif.46, 64–72 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baylan O, Kisa O, Albay A, Doganci L. Evaluation of a new automated, rapid, colorimetric culture system using solid medium for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis and determination of anti-tuberculosis drug susceptibility. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.8(6), 772–777 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kocagoz T, O’Brien R, Perkins M. A new colorimetric culture system for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.8(12), 1512; author reply 1513 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan M, Kalantri S, Flores L, Pai M. A commercial line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis.5, 62 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillemann D, Weizenegger M, Kubica T, Richter E, Niemann S. Use of the genotype MTBDR assay for rapid detection of rifampin and isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.43(8), 3699–3703 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makinen J, Marttila HJ, Marjamaki M, Viljanen MK, Soini H. Comparison of two commercially available DNA line probe assays for detection of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.44(2), 350–352 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantri S, Pai M, Pascopella L, Riley L, Reingold A. Bacteriophage-based tests for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis.5(1), 59 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai M, Kalantri S, Pascopella L, Riley LW, Reingold AL. Bacteriophage-based assays for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. J. Infect.51(3), 175–187 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SM, al-Suwaidi Z, McNerney R, Porter J, Drobniewski F. Evaluation of a new rapid bacteriophage-based method for the drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nature Med.3(4), 465–468 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs WR Jr, Barletta RG, Udani R et al. Rapid assessment of drug susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by means of luciferase reporter phages. Science260(5109), 819–822 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mole RJ, Trollip AP, Seaman T, Abrahams C, Albert H. Improved contamination control using a new antimicrobial supplement developed for rapid phage-based rifampicin susceptibility testing. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.9(11 Suppl. 1), S271 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Guerra H, Rojas G, Chauca J et al. Evaluation of a phage amplification assay for detection of MDR-TB in smear-positive patients in Lima, Peru (preliminary report). Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis.9(11 Suppl. 1), S196 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Riska PF, Su Y, Bardarov S et al. Rapid film-based determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by using a luciferase reporter phage and the Bronx box. J. Clin. Microbiol.37(4), 1144–1149 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazbon MH, Guarin N, Ferro BE et al. Photographic and luminometric detection of luciferase reporter phages for drug susceptibility testing of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.41(10), 4865–4869 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hajj HH, Marras SA, Tyagi S, Kramer FR, Alland D. Detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a single tube with molecular beacons. J. Clin. Microbiol.39(11), 4131–4137 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SYG, Probert W, Lo M, Desmond E. Rapid detection of isoniazid and rifampin resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from cultures or smear-positive sputa by use of molecular beacons. J. Clin. Microbiol.42(9), 4204–4208 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatek AS, Telenti A, Murray MR et al. Genotypic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in two distinct populations using molecular beacons: implications for rapid susceptibility testing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44(1), 103–110 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma-Basil M, El-Hajj H, Colangeli R et al. Rapid detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from India and Mexico by a molecular beacon assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.42(12), 5512–5516 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SYG, Mase S, Desmond E et al. Utilization of molecular beacons for rapid detection of MDR-TB in a public health setting. 45th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, DC, USA, (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Caviedes L, Lee TS, Gilman RH et al. Rapid, efficient detection and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by microscopic observation of broth cultures. The Tuberculosis Working Group in Peru. J. Clin. Microbiol.38(3), 1203–1208 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Mendoza D, Gilman RH et al. Microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay, a rapid, reliable diagnostic test for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis suitable for use in resource-poor settings. J. Clin. Microbiol.42(10), 4432–4437 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small PM, Perkins MD. More rigour needed in trials of new diagnostic agents for tuberculosis. Lancet356(9235), 1048–1049 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahid P, Pai M, Hopewell PC. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc.3, 103–110 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perkins MD, Roscigno G, Zumla A. Progress towards improved tuberculosis diagnostics for developing countries. Lancet367, 942–943 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar