Dynamics of biological systems: role of systems biology in medical research

References

• Wolkenhauer O, Mesarovic M. Feedback dynamics and cell function: why systems biology is called systems biology. Mol. BioSystems1(1), 14–16 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer VR, Eisen MB, Ross DT et al. The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum. Science283(5398), 83–87 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ideker T, Thorsson V, Ranish JA et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science292(5518), 929–934 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholodenko BN, Kiyatkin A, Bruggeman FJ, Sontag E, Westerhoff HV, Hoek JB. Untangling the wires: a strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99(20), 12841–12846 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Wilson ID. The challenges of modeling mammalian biocomplexity. Nat. Biotechnol.22(10), 1268–1274 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerhoff HV, Palsson O. The evolution of molecular biology into systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol.22(10), 1249–1252 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature409(6822), 860–921 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter CJ, Adams MD, Myers EW et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science291(5507), 1304–1351 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomburg I, Chang A, Hofmann O et al. BRENDA: a resource for enzyme data and metabolic information. Trends Biochem Sci.27(1), 54–56 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M et al. A human protein–protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell122(6), 957–968 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network. Nature437(7062), 1173–1178 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somogyi R, Greller LD. The dynamics of molecular networks: applications to therapeutic discovery. Drug Discov. Today6(24), 1267–1277 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao BM, Lauffenburger DA, Wittrup KD. Integrating cell-level kinetic modeling into the design of engineered protein therapeutics. Nat. Biotechnol.23(2), 191–194 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson G, Wilde GJC, Spiller DG et al. Dynamic analysis of STAT6 signalling in living cells. FEBS Lett.532(1–2), 188–192 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DE, Ihekwaba AEC, Elliott M et al. Oscillations in NF-κB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. Science306(5696), 704–708 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwille P, Haupts U, Maiti S, Webb WW. Molecular dynamics in living cells observed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with one- and two-photon excitation. Biophys. J.77(4), 2251–2265 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman MA, Brown CM, Sengupta P, Wiseman PW, Horwitz AR, Gratton E. Measuring fast dynamics in solutions and cells with a laser scanning microscope. Biophys. J.89(2), 1317–1327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu WB, Jericho MH, Meinertzhagen IA, Kreuzer HJ. Digital in-line holography for biological applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98(20), 11301–11305 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewis AA, Zhelev Z, Bakalova R et al. A history of microarrays in biomedicine. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.5(3), 315–328 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Dunn WB, Harrigan GG, Kell DB. Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol.22(5), 245–252 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernie AR, Trethewey RN, Krotzky AJ, Willmitzer L. Innovation – metabolite profiling: from diagnostics to systems biology. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.5(9), 763–769 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadkar KG, Varner J, Doyle III FJ. Model identification of signal transduction networks from data using a state regulator problem. IEE Proc. Systems Biology2(1), 17–30 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) – toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet.29, 365–371 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faller D, Klingmüller U, Timmer J. Simulation methods for optimal experimental design in systems biology. Simulation79(12), 717–725 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor CF, Paton NW, Garwood KL et al. A systematic approach to modeling, capturing, and disseminating proteomics experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol.21(3), 247–254 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Bader G et al. The HUPO PSI’s molecular interaction format – a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat. Biotechnol.22(10), 177–183 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics19(4), 524–531 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd CM, Halstead MD and Nielsen PF. CellML: its future, present and past. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.85, 433–450 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzold T, Ulyanov A, Argos P. SRS: information retrieval system for molecular biology data banks. Methods Enzymol.266, 114–128 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasprzyk A, Keefe D, Smedley D et al. EnsMart: a generic system for fast and flexible access to biological data. Genome Res.14(1), 160–169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitton Y, Dahmane N, Baik S et al. A gene expression map of human chromosome 21 orthologues in the mouse. Nature420(6915), 586–590 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavazoie S, Hughes JD, Campbell MJ, Cho RJ, Church GM. Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nat. Genet.22(3), 281–285 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang D. A data integration methodology for systems biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(48), 17296–17301 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang D. A data integration methodology for systems biology: experimental verification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(48), 17302–17307 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenhauer O, Ullah M, Kolch W, Cho KH. Modeling and simulation of intracellular dynamics: Choosing an appropriate framework. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience3(3), 200–207 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao CV, Wolf DM, Arkin AP. Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise. Nature420(6912), 231–237 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B. Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.15(2), 221–231 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolkenhauer O, Ullah M, Wellstead P, Cho KH. The dynamic systems approach to control and regulation of intracellular networks. FEBS Lett.579(8), 1846–1853 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: A literature review. J. Comp. Biol.9(1), 67–103 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klipp E, Herwig R, Kowald A, Wierling C, Lehrach H. Systems Biology in Practice. Concepts, Implementation and Application. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Arkin AP. Synthetic cell biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.12(6), 638–644 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster R, Jacobasch G, Holzhutter HG. Mathematical-modeling of metabolic pathways affected by an enzyme deficiency - energy and redox metabolism of glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase-deficient erythrocytes. Eur. J. Biochem.182(3), 605–612 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jamshidi N, Wiback SJ, Palsson BO. In silico model-driven assessment of the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on human red blood cell metabolism. Genome Res.12(11), 1687–1692 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortassa S, Aon MA, Marbán E, Winslow RL, O’Rourke B. An integrated model of cardiac mitochondrial energy metabolism and calcium dynamics. Biophys. J.84(4), 2734–2755 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholodenko BN. Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. Eur. J. Biochem.267(6), 1583–1588 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hornberg JJ, Binder B, Bruggeman FJ, Schoeberl B, Heinrich R, Westerhoff HV. Control of MAPK signalling: from complexity to what really matters. Oncogene24(36), 5533–5542 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E, Salic A, Krueger R, Heinrich R, Kirschner MW. The roles of APC and axin derived from experimental and theoretical analysis of the Wnt pathway. PLoS Biology1(1), 116–132 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swameye I, Müller TG, Timmer J, Sandra O, Klingmüller U. Identification of nucleocytoplasmic cycling as a remote sensor in cellular signaling by databased modeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(3), 1028–1033 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussenegger M, Bailey JE, Varner J. A mathematical model of caspase function in apoptosis. Nat. Biotechnol.18(7), 768–774 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson JJ, Novak B. Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions. J. Theoret. Biol.210(2), 249–263 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasethupathy P, Vayttaden SJ, Bhalla US. Systems modeling: a pathway to drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.9(4), 400–406 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble D. Modeling the heart – from genes to cells to the whole organ. Science295(5560), 1678–1682 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood L, Perlmutter RM. The impact of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nat. Biotechnol.22(10), 1215–1217 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger J, Bocchini C, Valle D, McKusick VA. Online Mendelian Inheritance in man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res.30(1), 52–55 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher EC, Berg EL, Kunkel EC. Systems biology in drug discovery. Nat. Biotechnol.22(10), 1253–1259 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman MC, Porter JA. Pharmaceuticals – a new grammar for drug discovery. Nature437(7058), 491–493 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson JK, Connelly J, Lindon JC, Holmes E. Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.1(2), 153–161 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porksen N, Hollingdal M, Juhl C, Butler P, Veldhuis JD, Schmitz O. Pulsatile insulin secretion: detection, regulation, and role in diabetes. Diabetes51(Suppl.), S245–S254 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med.350(21), 2129–2139 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: Correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science304(5676), 1497–1500 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mormont MC, Levi F. Cancer chronotherapy: principles, applications, and perspectives. Cancer97(1), 155–169 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy DM, Schlessinger L. Archimedes – a trial-validated model of diabetes. Diabetes Care26(11), 3093–3101 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agur Z, Arakelyan L, Belilty G et al. Application of the virtual cancer patient engine (VCPE) for improving oncological treatment design. J. Clin. Oncol.22(14), 50S692 Suppl. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Christopher R, Dhiman A, Fox J, et al. Data-driven computer simulation of human cancer cell. Ann. NY Acad. Sci.1020, 132–153 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futreal PA, Coin L, Marshall M et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer4(3), 177–183 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmain A, Gray J, Ponder B. The genetics and genomics of cancer. Nat. Genet.33, 238–244 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat. Med.10(8), 789–799 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michor F, Iwasa Y, Nowak MA. Dynamics of cancer progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer4(3), 197–205 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May P, May E. Twenty years of p53 research: structural and functional aspects of the p53 protein. Oncogene18(53), 7621–7636 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguda BD. A quantitative analysis of the kinetics of the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96(20), 11352–11357 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Or RL, Maya R, Segel LA, Alon U, Levine AJ, Oren M. Generation of oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop: a theoretical and experimental study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97(21), 11250–11255 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano H. Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer4(3), 227–235 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michor F, Hughes TP, Iwasa Y et al. Dynamics of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nature435(7046), 1267–1270 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michor F, Iwasa Y, Rajagopalan H, Lengauer C, Nowak MA. Linear model of colon cancer initiation. Cell Cycle3(3), 358–362 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarova NL. Mathematical modeling of tumorigenesis: mission possible. Curr. Opin. Oncol.17(1), 39–43 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greller LD, Tobin FL, Poste G. Tumor heterogeneity and progression: conceptual foundations for modeling. Invasion Metastasis16(4–5), 177–208 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatenby RA, Gawlinski ET. The glycolytic phenotype in carcinogenesis and tumor invasion. Cancer Res.63(14), 3847–3854 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantin VR, Berardi MJ, Scorrano L, Korsmeyer SJ, Leder P. A novel mitochondriotoxic small molecule that selectively inhibits tumor cell growth. Cancer Cell2(1), 29–42 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp S, Horobin RW. A predictive model for the selective accumulation of chemicals in tumor cells. Eur. Biophys. J.34(7), 958–966 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Adams GP, Weiner LM. Monoclonal antibody therapy of cancer. Nat. Biotechnol.23(9), 1147–1157 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes NE, Lane HA. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cancer5, 341–354 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kholodenko BN, Demin OV, Moehren G, Hoek JB. Quantification of short term signaling by the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem.274(42), 30169–30181 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resat H, Ewald JA, Dixon DA, Wiley HS. An integrated model of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking and signal transduction. Biophys. J.85(2), 730–743 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda K, Matsuoka Y, Funahashi A, Kitano H. A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Mol. Syst. Biol.1, E1–E17 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornberg JJ, Bruggeman FJ, Westerhoff HV, Lankelma J. Cancer: a systems biology disease. Biosystems83(2–3), 81–90 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agur Z, Cojocaru L, Mazor G, Anderson RM, Danon YL. Pulse mass measles vaccination across age cohorts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA90(24), 11698–11702 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segel LA, Jager E, Elias D, Cohen IR. A quantitative model of autoimmune-disease and T-cell vaccination: does more mean less? Immunol. Today16(2), 80–84 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fishman MA, Segel LA. Modeling immunotherapy for allergy. Bull. Math Biol.58(6), 1099–1121 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segel LA. Multiple attractors in immunology: theory and experiment. Biophys. Chem.72(1), 223–230 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretscher MT, Althaus CL, Muller V, Bonhoeffer S. Recombination in HIV and the evolution of drug resistance: for better or for worse? Bioessays26(2), 180–188 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers LA, Pourbohloul B, Newman MEJ, Skowronski DM, Brunham RC. Network theory and SARS: predicting outbreak diversity. J. Theoret. Biol.232(1), 71–81 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvano SE, Xiao WZ, Richards DR et al. A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans. Nature437(7061), 1032–1037 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarmush ML, Banta S. Metabolic engineering: advances in the modeling and intervention in health and disease. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng.5, 349–381 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier G, Deniau JM. Disinhibition as a basic process in the expression of striatal functions. Trends Neurosci.13(7), 277–280 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire V, Tobin FL, Greller LD, Cho CR, Suva LJ. Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling. J. Theoret. Biol.229(3), 293–309 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano H, Oda K, Kimura T et al. Metabolic syndrome and robustness tradeoffs. Diabetes53(Suppl.), S6–S15 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Schilling M, Maiwald T, Bohl S et al. Quantitative data generation for systems biology – the impact of randomisation, calibrators and normalisers. IEE Proc. Systems Biology152(4), 193–200 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomita M. Whole-cell simulation: a grand challenge of the 21st century. Trends Biotechnol.19(6), 205–210 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoep JL. The Silicon Cell initiative: working towards a detailed kinetic description at the cellular level. Curr. Opin. Biotech.16(3), 336–343 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunge MA. Scientific Research. Springer, Berlin, Germany (1967).
   Google Scholar