Carotid artery stenting: it's all about appropriate patient selection and keeping to the indications

References

• Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Moore WS, Veith FJ. Optimal contemporary management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Vascular 2011;19(3):117-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Abbott AL, Veith FJ. Optimal management of patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: work in progress. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2014;12(4):437-41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawkins BM, Abu-Fadel MS, Rosenfield K. Risk assessment for carotid artery stenting. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2014;12(5):565-72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Veith FJ. Carotid artery stenting may be losing the battle against carotid endarterectomy for the management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis but the jury is still out. Vascular 2009;17(4):183-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Veith FJ. Mechanisms to explain the poor results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in symptomatic patients to date and options to improve CAS outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2010;52(5):1367-75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Veith FJ. Are symptomatic patients appropriate candidates for carotid artery stenting? No (at least not at present). Vascular 2010;18(4):185-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Veith FJ, Riles TS, Moore WS. Is carotid artery stenting a fair alternative to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis? A commentary on the AHA/ASA guidelines. J Vasc Surg 2011;54(2):541-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraskevas KI, Veith FJ, Riles TS, Moore WS. Is carotid artery stenting a fair alternative to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;41(6):717-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. American College of Cardiology; American Stroke Association; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; American College of Radiology; American College of Radiology; Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Surgery. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2011;124(4):e54-130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricotta JJ, Aburahma A, Ascher E, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg 2011;54(3):e1-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, et al. on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council of Clinical Cardiology, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42(1):227-76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci G, Accrocca F, Antonelli R, et al. High-risk patients for carotid endarterectomy: turned down cases are rare. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2012;53(3):333-43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshida S, Bensley RP, Glaser JD, et al. The current national criteria for carotid artery stenting overestimate its efficacy in patients who are symptomatic and at high risk. J Vasc Surg 2013;58(1):120-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qureshi AI, Chaudhury SA, Hussein HM, et al. A comparison of outcomes associated with carotid artery stent placement performed within and outside clinical trials in the United States. J Vasc Surg 2012;56(2):317-23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott AL, Adelman MA, Alexandrov AV, et al. Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;43(3):247-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott AL, Adelman MA, Alexandrov AV, et al. Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting. Vascular 2012;20(1):1-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott AL, Adelman MA, Alexandrov AV, et al. Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting. Int Angiol 2012;31(1):85-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott AL, Adelman MA, Alexandrov AV, et al. Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting. Angiology 2012;63(8):639-44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott AL, Adelman MA, Alexandrov AV, et al. Why calls for more routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate: an international, multispecialty, expert review and position statement. Stroke 2013;44(4):1186-90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray WA, Macdonald S, Schneider PA. Should Medicare reimbursement for carotid artery stenting be extended to standard and low risk symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis? Vascular 2012;20(1):7-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray WA. Carotid stenting or carotid surgery in average surgical-risk patients: interpreting the conflicting clinical trial data. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2011;54(1):14-21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortega G, Alvarez B, Quintana M, et al. Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Cognitive Improvement using Transcervical Stenting with Protective Flow Reversal Technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott AL. Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 2009;40(10):e573-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor AR, Gaines PA, Rothwell PM. Who benefits most from intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: patients or professionals? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37(6):625-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppi G, Moratto R, Silingardi R, et al. Advancements in the Mo.Ma system procedure during carotid artery stenting. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2009;50(6):789-93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikas D, Reith W, Schmidt A, et al. Prospective, multicenter European study of the GORE flow reversal system for providing neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80(7):1060-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunwald IQ, Reith W, Kuhn AL, et al. Proximal protection with the Gore PAES can reduce DWI lesion size in high-grade stenosis during carotid stenting. EuroIntervention 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer C, Franke J, Bertog SC, et al. FiberNet - a new embolic protection device for carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014;83(6):1014-20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goode SD, Hoggard N, Macdonald S, et al. Assessment of reverse flow as a means of cerebral protection during carotid artery stent placement with diffusion-weighted and transcranial Doppler imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24(4):528-33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schonholz C. Flow reversal protects the brain from macro- and microembolization better than filters do. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24(4):533-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokin M, Dumont TM, Chi JM, et al. Proximal versus distal protection during carotid artery stenting: analysis of the two treatment approaches and associated clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg 2014;81(3-4):543-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castro-Alfonso LH, Abud LG, Rolo JG, et al. Flow reversal versus filter protection: a pilot carotid artery stenting randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6(5):552-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harada K, Kakumoto K, Morioka J, et al. Combination of flow reversal and distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28(3):651-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, et al. Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: a single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach. J Endovasc Ther 2014;21(1):127-36
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sfyroeras GS, Moulakakis KG, Markatis F, et al. Results of carotid artery stenting with transcervical access. J Vasc Surg 2013;58(5):1402-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, et al. ESVS Guidelines Collaborators. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37(Suppl 4):1-19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liapis CD, Bell PF, Mikhailidis DP, et al. ESVS Guidelines Collaborators; European Society for Vascular Surgery. ESVS Guidelines: section A – prevention in patients with carotid stenosis. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2010;8(5):673-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liapis CD, Bell PF, Mikhailidis DP, et al. ESVS Guidlines Collaborators; European Society for Vascular Surgery. ESVS Guidelines: section B - diagnosis and investigation of patients with carotid stenosis. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2010;8(5):682-91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar