Applications and software techniques for integrated cardiac multimodality imaging

References

• Achenbach S, Daniel W. Current Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography. Herz32(2), 97–107 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Patton JA, Slomka PJ, Germano G, Berman DS. Recent technologic advances in nuclear cardiology. J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(4), 501–513 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kramer CM. Integrated approach to ischemic heart disease. The one-stop shop. Cardiol. Clin.16(2), 267–276 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Cury RC, Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Nasir K, Cury RC, Brady TJ. Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion – -is it possible? J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(2), 229–243 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Med.47(7), 1107–1118 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachamovitch R, Di Carli MF. Nuclear cardiology will remain the ‘gatekeeper’ over CT angiography. J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(5), 634–644 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ et al. Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(4), 521–528 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R et al. Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment. Semin. Nucl. Med.37(1), 2–16 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia. J. Nucl. Med.45(2), 183–191 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Slomka PJ, Van Kriekinge SD, Pollard G, Berman DS. Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: The Cedars-Sinai approach. J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(4), 433–454 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Cohen I, Berman DS. Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43(2), 200–208 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation116(11), 1290–1305 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation.113(10), 1305–1310 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch KR, Busch JL, Allesio AM. Prospective ECG-gating for 64-slice cardiac CTA: initial experience. J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(2), S93 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al. Impact of different dose saving algorithms on radiation dose estimates of cardiac dual source CT angiography. JCCT1, S7 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Slomka PJ. Software approach to merging molecular with anatomic information. J. Nucl. Med.45(1 Suppl.), 36–45S (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalbfleisch H, Hort W. Quantitative study on the size of coronary artery supplying areas postmortem. Am. Heart J.94(2), 183–188 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Schindler TH, Magosaki N, Jeserich M et al. Fusion imaging: combined visualization of 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree and 3D myocardial scintigraphic image in coronary artery disease. Int. J. Card. Imaging15(5), 357–368 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Faber TL, Santana CA, Garcia EV et al. Three-dimensional fusion of coronary arteries with myocardial perfusion distributions: clinical validation. J. Nucl. Med.45(5), 745–753 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl P, McKay N. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.14239–256 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aladl UE, Hurwitz GA, Dey D, Levin D, Drangova M, Slomka PJ. Automated image registration of gated cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging19(3), 283–290 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Kalff V et al. Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging34(7), 1097–1106 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS et al. ‘Motion-frozen’ display and quantification of myocardial perfusion. J. Nucl. Med.45(7) 1128–1134 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Slomka P, Suzuki Y, Elad Y et al. Software fusion of 64-slice CT angiography and myocardial perfusion SPECT: evidence of synergy. Presented at: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2007 annual meeting. Washington, DC, USA, 2–6 June 2007 (Abstract 17).
   Google Scholar
• Cho K, Kumiata S, Okada S, Kumazaki T. Development of respiratory gated myocardial SPECT system. J. Nucl. Cardiol.6(1 Pt 1), 20–28 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kovalski G, Israel O, Keidar Z, Frenkel A, Sachs J, Azhari H. Correction of heart motion due to respiration in clinical myocardial perfusion SPECT scans using respiratory gating. J. Nucl. Med.48(4), 630–636 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Möller A, Zikic D, Botnar R et al. Dual cardiac–respiratory gated PET: implementation and results from a feasibility study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging34(9), 1447–1454 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Nakaura T, Utsunomiya D, Shiraishi S et al. Three-dimensional cardiac image fusion using new CT angiography and SPECT methods. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.185(6), 1554–1557 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J. Nucl. Med.36(11), 2138–2147 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin D, Aladl U, Germano G, Slomka P. Techniques for efficient, real-time, 3D visualization of multi-modality cardiac data using consumer graphics hardware. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.29(6), 463–475 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bax JJ, Beanlands RS, Klocke FJ et al. Diagnostic and clinical perspectives of fusion imaging in cardiology: is the total greater than the sum of its parts? Heart93, 16–22 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Namdar M, Hany TF, Koepfli P et al. Integrated PET/CT for the Assessment of coronary artery disease: a feasibility study. J. Nucl. Med.46, 930–935 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I et al. Cardiac image fusion from stand-alone SPECT and CT: clinical experience. J. Nucl. Med.48(5), 696–703 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P et al. Use of coronary calcium score scans from stand-alone multislice computed tomography for attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging34(1), 11–19 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Le Meunier L, Maass-Moreno R, Carrasquillo JA, Dieckmann W, Bacharach SL. PET/CT imaging: effect of respiratory motion on apparent myocardial uptake. J. Nucl. Cardiol.13(6), 821–830 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalki K, Blankespoor SC, Brown JK et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with a combined x-ray CT and SPECT system. J. Nucl. Med.38(10), 1535–1540 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Townsend DW, Cherry SR. Combining anatomy and function: the path to true image fusion. Eur. Radiol.11(10), 1968–1974 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Schillaci O. Hybrid SPECT/CT: a new era for SPECT imaging? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging.32(5), 521–524 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. New Technology for Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation115, 1464–1480 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmarian JJ. Hybrid SPECT-CT: integration of CT coronary artery calcium scoring and angiography with myocardial perfusion. Curr. Cardiol. Rep.9(2), 129–135 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(10), 1059–1067 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Meserve J, El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Moore SC. Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med.48(5), 783–793 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis T, Gaemperli O, Koepfli P et al. Added value of coronary artery calcium score as an adjunct to gated SPECT for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in an intermediate-risk population. J. Nucl. Med.48(9), 1424–1430 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rosman J, Shapiro M, Pandey A, VanTosh A, Bergmann SR. Lack of correlation between coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Cardiol.13(3), 333–337 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Ropers D. Multislice computer tomography for detection of coronary artery disease. J. Interv. Cardiol.19(6), 574–582 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur. Radiol.16(2), 256–268 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori S, Kondo C, Suzuki N, Hattori A, Kusakabe M, Endo M. Volumetric coronary angiography using the 256-detector row computed tomography scanner: comparison in vivo and in vitro with porcine models. Acta Radiol.47(2), 186–191 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD, deKemp RA et al. Positron emission tomography and recovery following revascularization (PARR-1): the importance of scar and the development of a prediction rule for the degree of recovery of left ventricular function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.40(10), 1735–1743 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation100(19), 1992–2002 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvanayagam JB, Kardos A, Francis JM et al. Value of delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in predicting myocardial viability after surgical revascularization. Circulation110(12), 1535–1541 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mari C, Strauss WH. Detection and characterization of hibernating myocardium. Nucl. Med. Commun.23(4), 311–322 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation105(2), 162–167 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertschinger KM, Nanz D, Buechi M et al. Magnetic resonance myocardial first-pass perfusion imaging: parameter optimization for signal response and cardiac coverage. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging14(5), 556–562 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson LE, Fieno DS, Abidov A et al. Added value of rest to stress study for recognition of artifacts in perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.9(5), 733–740 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Carli MF. Positron Emission Tomography for assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability. Cardiol. Rev.6(5), 290–301 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Makela T, Pham QC, Clarysse P et al. A 3-D model-based registration approach for the PET, MR and MCG cardiac data fusion. Med. Image Anal.7, 377–389 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu YW, Tadamura E, Yamamuro M et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI with 18F-FDG PET/201Tl SPECT in dysfunctional myocardium: relation to early functional outcome after surgical revascularization in chronic ischemic heart disease. J. Nucl. Med.48(7), 1096–1103 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Dilsizian V. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus SPECT: are all noninfarct myocardial regions created equal? J. Nucl. Cardiol.14(1), 9–14 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Catana C, Wu Y, Judenhofer MS, Qi J, Pichler BJ, Cherry SR. Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner. J. Nucl. Med.47(12), 1968–1976 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Hoffmann U et al. Noninvasive in vivo measurement of vascular inflammation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol.12(3), 294–301 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudd JH, Warburton EA, Fryer TD et al. Imaging atherosclerotic plaque inflammation with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Circulation105(23), 2708–2711 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy MP, Freiman A, Larson SM, Strauss HW. Association of vascular 18F-FDG uptake with vascular calcification. J. Nucl. Med.46(8), 1278–1284 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Haim S, Kupzov E, Tamir A, Israel O. Evaluation of 18F-FDG uptake and arterial wall calcifications using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J. Nucl. Med. Nov45(11), 1816–1821 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the aortic wall at PET/CT: possible finding for active atherosclerosis. Radiology229(3), 831–837 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Weissberg PL. Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerosis: the biology behind the pictures. J. Nucl. Med.45(11), 1794–1795 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Davies JR, Rudd JHF, Weissberg PL, Narula J. Radionuclide imaging for the detection of inflammation in vulnerable plaques. Detection of Vulnerable Plaques.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(8, Suppl. 1), C57–C68 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman DS. Fourth annual Mario S. Verani, MD Memorial Lecture: noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease: changing roles, changing players. J. Nucl. Cardiol.13(4), 457–473 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Slomka PJ, Fieno D, Thomson L et al. Automatic detection and size quantification of infarcts by myocardial perfusion SPECT: clinical validation by delayed-enhancement MRI. J. Nucl. Med.46(5), 728–735 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar