Recent advances in mass spectrometry: data independent analysis and hyper reaction monitoring

References

• Jørgensen C, Locard-Paulet M. Analysing signalling networks by mass spectrometry. Amino. Acids 43(3), 1061–1074 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Frese CK, Altelaar AFM, Hennrich ML et al. Improved peptide identification by targeted fragmentation using CID, HCD and ETD on an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos. J. Proteome Res. 10(5), 2377–2388 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen H, Küster B, Fernandez M, Pandey A, Mann M. Detection of tyrosine phosphorylated peptides by precursor ion scanning quadrupole TOF mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. Anal. Chem. 73(7), 1440–1448 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• McLachlin DT, Chait BT. Analysis of phosphorylated proteins and peptides by mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5(5), 591–602 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Borchers C, Parker CE, Deterding LJ, Tomer KB. Preliminary comparison of precursor scans and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry on a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. J. Chromatogr. A 854(1–2), 119–130 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo CM, Chung L, Bruce C, Cheung K-H. Review of software tools for design and analysis of large scale MRM proteomic datasets. Methods 61(3), 287–298 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox DM, Zhong F, Du M, Duchoslav E, Sakuma T, McDermott JC. Multiple reaction monitoring as a method for identifying protein posttranslational modifications. J. Biomol. Tech. 16(2), 83–90 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unwin RD, Griffiths JR, Leverentz MK, Grallert A, Hagan IM, Whetton AD. Multiple reaction monitoring to identify sites of protein phosphorylation with high sensitivity. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4(8), 1134–1144 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wenner BR, Lynn BC. Factors that affect ion trap data-dependent MS/MS in proteomics. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 15(2), 150–157 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wolf-Yadlin A, Hautaniemi S, Lauffenburger DA, White FM. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 104(14), 5860–5865 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wu L, Han DK. Overcoming the dynamic range problem in mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 3(6), 611–619 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houel S, Abernathy R, Renganathan K, Meyer-Arendt K, Ahn NG, Old WM. Quantifying the impact of chimera MS/MS spectra on peptide identification in large-scale proteomics studies. J. Proteome Res. 9(8), 4152–4160 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luethy R, Kessner DE, Katz JE et al. Precursor-ion mass re-estimation improves peptide identification on hybrid instruments. J. Proteome Res. 7(9), 4031–4039 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Michalski A, Cox J, Mann M. More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC–MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 10(4), 1785–1793 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 100(12), 6940–6945 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Ciccimaro E, Blair IA. Stable-isotope dilution LC–MS for quantitative biomarker analysis. Bioanalysis 2(2), 311–341 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonami R, Schoen A, Prakash A et al. Increased selectivity, analytical precision, and throughput in targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10(2), M110.002931 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörtstedt H, Kåredal MH, Jönsson BAG, Lindh CH. Screening method using selected reaction monitoring for targeted proteomics studies of nasal lavage fluid. J. Proteome Res. 12(1), 234–247 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotech. 17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin TJ, Sherman J, Aebersold R. Quantitative Proteomics (ICAT™). In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., NJ, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics 3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieske LR. A perspective on the use of iTRAQ™ reagent technology for protein complex and profiling studies. J. Exp. Bot. 57(7), 1501–1508 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye H, Sun L, Huang X, Zhang P, Zhao X. A proteomic approach for plasma biomarker discovery with 8-plex iTRAQ labeling and SCX-LC-MS/MS. Mol. Cell Biochem. 343(1–2), 91–99 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K et al. Tandem Mass Tags: A novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75(18), 4942–4942 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Pichler P, Koöcher T, Holzmann J et al. Peptide labeling with isobaric tags yields higher identification rates using iTRAQ 4-plex compared to TMT 6-plex and iTRAQ 8-plex on LTQ Orbitrap. Anal. Chem. 82(15), 6549–6558 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics 5(1), 4–15 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lottspeich F, Kellermann J. ICPL Labeling strategies for proteome research. In: Gel-Free Proteomics. Gevaert, K, Vandekerckhove, J (Eds). Humana Press, NY, USA 55–64 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1(5), 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong S-E, Mann M. A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Nat. Protocols 1(6), 2650–2660 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewel J, Schutkowski M, Liu J, White C, Emili A. FAIMS/MS/MS: development of high-throughput targeted peptide monitoring for the detection of low abundant protein markers. In: The 18th IMSC. Bremen, Germany (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Fortin T, Salvador A, Charrier JP et al. Multiple reaction monitoring cubed for protein quantification at the low nanogram/milliliter level in nondepleted human serum. Anal. Chem. 81(22), 9343–9352 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi T, Su D, Liu T et al. Advancing the sensitivity of selected reaction monitoring-based targeted quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 12(8), 1074–1092 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picotti P, Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat. Meth. 9(6), 555–566 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaei H, McBee JK, Watts J, Aebersold R. Comparative evaluation of current peptide production platforms used in absolute quantification in proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7(4), 813–823 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picotti P, Rinner O, Stallmach R et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Meth. 7(1), 43–46 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiess R, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R. Targeted proteomic strategy for clinical biomarker discovery. Mol. Oncol. 3(1), 33–44 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteaker JR, Lin C, Kennedy J et al. A targeted proteomics-based pipeline for verification of biomarkers in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol. 29(7), 625–634 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman RH, Carruthers R, Hoyes JB et al. A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13(7), 792–803 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JC, Gorenstein MV, Li G-Z, Vissers JPC, Geromanos SJ. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE : A virtue of parallel ms acquisition. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5(1), 144–156 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JC, Denny R, Dorschel C et al. Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome: A sweet tale. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5(4), 589–607 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Purvine S, Eppel J-T, Yi EC, Goodlett DR. Shotgun collision-induced dissociation of peptides using a time of flight mass analyzer. Proteomics 3(6), 847–850 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niggeweg R, Köcher T, Gentzel M et al. A general precursor ion-like scanning mode on quadrupole-TOF instruments compatible with chromatographic separation. Proteomics 6(1), 41–53 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geromanos SJ, Vissers JPC, Silva JC et al. The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS. Proteomics 9(6), 1683–1695 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G-Z, Vissers JPC, Silva JC, Golick D, Gorenstein MV, Geromanos SJ. Database searching and accounting of multiplexed precursor and product ion spectra from the data independent analysis of simple and complex peptide mixtures. Proteomics 9(6), 1696–1719 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn K, Mbeunkui F, Mitra SK, Mentzel T, Goshe MB. Improving protein and proteome coverage through data-independent multiplexed peptide fragmentation. J. Proteome Res. 9(7), 3621–3637 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Levin Y, Hradetzky E, Bahn S. Quantification of proteins using data-independent analysis (MSE) in simple and complex samples: A systematic evaluation. Proteomics 11(16), 3273–3287 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VJ, Thalassinos K, Slade SE et al. A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches. J. Proteome Res. 8(7), 3752–3759 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon J, Park S, Park C, Kwon S-O, Choi J-S. Analysis of membrane proteome by data-dependent LC-MS/MS combined with data-independent LC-MSE technique. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 1(1), 78–85 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shliaha PV, Bond NJ, Gatto L, Lilley KS. Effects of traveling wave ion mobility separation on data independent acquisition in proteomics studies. J. Proteome Res. 12(6), 2323–2339 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bond NJ, Shliaha PV, Lilley KS, Gatto L. Improving qualitative and quantitative performance for MSE-based label-free proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 12(6), 2340–2353 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers JPC, Langridge JI, Aerts JMFG. Analysis and quantification of diagnostic serum markers and protein signatures for Gaucher disease. Mol. Cell Proteomics 6(5), 755–766 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ma D, Chan MK, Lockstone HE et al. Antipsychotic treatment alters protein expression associated with presynaptic function and nervous system development in rat frontal cortex. J. Proteome Res. 8(7), 3284–3297 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Lockstone HE, Guest PC et al. Expression profiling of fibroblasts identifies cell cycle abnormalities in Schizophrenia. J. Proteome Res. 9(1), 521–527 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Levin Y, Wang L, Schwarz E, Koethe D, Leweke FM, Bahn S. Global proteomic profiling reveals altered proteomic signature in schizophrenia serum. Mol. Psychiatry 15(11), 1088–1100 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy D, Levin Y, Harris LW, Umrania Y, Bahn S, Guest PC. Analysis of the human pituitary proteome by data independent label-free liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Proteomics 11(3), 495–500 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng F-y, Blackburn K, Lin Y-m, Goshe MB, Williamson JD. Absolute protein quantification by LC/MSE for global analysis of salicylic acid-induced plant protein secretion responses. J. Proteome Res. 8(1), 82–93 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn K, Cheng F-y, Williamson JD, Goshe MB. Data-independent liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MSE) detection and quantification of the secreted Apium graveolens pathogen defense protein mannitol dehydrogenase. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectro. 24(7), 1009–1016 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Stobaugh JT, Fague KM, Jorgenson JW. Prefractionation of intact proteins by reversed-phase and anion-exchange chromatography for the differential proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 12(2), 626–636 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Fernandez R, Aloria K, Arizmendi JM, Jorrin-Novo JV. Application of label-free shotgun nUPLC–MSE and 2-DE approaches in the study of Botrytis cinerea Mycelium. J. Proteome Res. 12(6), 3042–3056 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Geiger T, Cox J, Mann M. Proteomics on an Orbitrap benchtop mass spectrometer using all-ion fragmentation. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9(10), 2252–2261 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox Jr, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. Andromeda: A peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10(4), 1794–1805 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbrod CR, Eng JK, Hoopmann MR, Baker T, Bruce JE. Accurate peptide fragment mass analysis: Multiplexed peptide identification and quantification. J. Proteome Res. 11(3), 1621–1632 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews GL, Simons BL, Young JB, Hawkridge AM, Muddiman DC. Performance characteristics of a new hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer (TripleTOF 5600). Anal. Chem. 83(13), 5442–5446 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Hüttenhain R, Surinova S et al. Quantitative measurements of N-linked glycoproteins in human plasma by SWATH-MS. Proteomics 13(8), 1247–1256 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held JM, Schilling B, D'Souza AK et al. Label-free quantitation and mapping of the ErbB2 tumor receptor by multiple protease digestion with data-dependent (MS1) and data-independent (MS2) acquisitions. Int. J. Proteomics 2013, Article ID 791985 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11(6), O111.016717 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm M, Bertsch A, Gropl C et al. OpenMS - An open-source software framework for mass spectrometry. BMC Bioinformatics 9(1), 163 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bertsch A, Gröpl C, Reinert K, Kohlbacher O. OpenMS and TOPP: open source software for LC-MS data analysis. In: Data Mining in Proteomics. Hamacher, M, Eisenacher, M, Stephan, C (Eds). Humana Press, NY, USA 353–367 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt OM, Selevsek N, Gillet LC et al. Spectronaut: a fast and efficient algorithm for MRM-like processing of data independent acquisition (SWATH-MS) data. In: 60th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics. Vancouver, Canada 20–24 May (2012)
   Google Scholar
• Bruderer RM, Bernhardt OM, Gandhi TP et al. Comparison of DIA and shotgun quantitation on a Thermo Q Exactive. BIOGNOSYS Application Note, Zurich, Switzerland (2013).
   Google Scholar
• MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Shulman N et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26(7), 966–968 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereman MS, MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Liebler DC, MacCoss MJ. The development of selected reaction monitoring methods for targeted proteomics via empirical refinement. Proteomics 12(8), 1134–1141 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Perez-Santiago J, Katz JE, Mallick P, Bandeira N. Peptide identification from mixture tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell Proteomics 9(7), 1476–1485 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Bourne PE, Bandeira N. Peptide identification by database search of mixture tandem mass spectra. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Li X-j, Ye M, Pan S, Schwikowski B, Aebersold R. ProbIDtree: An automated software program capable of identifying multiple peptides from a single collision-induced dissociation spectrum collected by a tandem mass spectrometer. Proteomics 5(16), 4096–4106 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Fu C, Di L, Han X et al. Aldehyde oxidase 1 in human liver cytosols: Quantitative characterization of AOX1 expression level and activity relationship. Drug Metab. Dispos. (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Venable JD, Dong M-Q, Wohlschlegel J, Dillin A, Yates JR. Automated approach for quantitative analysis of complex peptide mixtures from tandem mass spectra. Nat. Meth. 1(1), 39–45 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bern M, Finney G, Hoopmann MR, Merrihew G, Toth MJ, MacCoss MJ. Deconvolution of mixture spectra from ion-trap data-independent-acquisition tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82(3), 833–841 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho PC, Han X, Xu T et al. XDIA: Improving on the label-free data-independent analysis. Bioinformatics 26(6), 847–848 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves G, Ogurtsov A, Kwok S et al. Detection of co-eluted peptides using database search methods. Biol. Direct 3(1), 1–16 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Egertson JD, Kuehn A, Merrihew GE et al. Multiplexed MS/MS for improved data-independent acquisition. Nat. Meth. 10, 744–746 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrod SD, Myers MV, Li M et al. Label-free quantitation of protein modifications by pseudo selected reaction monitoring with internal reference Peptides. J. Proteome Res. 11(6), 3467–3479 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pak H, Carla Pasquarello, Scherl A. Label-free protein quantifcation on tandem mass spectra in an ion trapping device. J. Integr. OMICS 1(2), 211–215 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson AC, Russell JD, Bailey DJ, Westphall MS, Coon JJ. Parallel reaction monitoring for high resolution and high mass accuracy quantitative, targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11(11), 1475–1488 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallien S, Duriez E, Crone C, Kellmann M, Moehring T, Domon B. Targeted proteomic quantification on quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell Proteomics 11(12), 1709–1723 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Gehlenborg N, Bodenmiller B et al. An integrated, directed mass spectrometric approach for in-depth characterization of complex peptide mixtures. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7(11), 2138–2150 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallien S, Duriez E, Demeure K, Domon B. Selectivity of LC-MS/MS analysis: Implication for proteomics experiments. J. Proteomics 81, 148–158 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Baek J-H, Kim H, Shin B, Yu M-H. Multiple products monitoring as a robust approach for peptide quantification. J. Proteome Res. 8(7), 3625–3632 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hewel JA, Phanse S, Liu J, Bousette N, Gramolini A, Emili A. Targeted protein identification, quantification and reporting for high-resolution nanoflow targeted peptide monitoring. J. Proteomics 81(0), 159–172 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya H, Tanaka K, Saeki Y. The parallel reaction monitoring method contributes to a highly sensitive polyubiquitin chain quantification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 436(2), 223–229 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevremont R. High-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry: A new tool for mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1058(1–2), 3–19 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar