Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Medical Devices Volume 10, 2013 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
124
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Evolving technologies in robotic surgery for minimally invasive treatment of gynecologic cancers

Kimberly L LevinsonThe Cleveland Clinic, Gynecologic Oncology Fellow, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk A-81, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
,
Melinda AuerThe Cleveland Clinic, Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk A-81, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
&
Pedro F EscobarInstituto Gine-Oncologico, Ponce School of Medicine, HIMA-San Pablo Oncologico, San Juan 00926, Puerto RicoCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 603-610 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Nezhat F. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics. Gynecol. Oncol. 111, 529–532 (2008).
  • Kehoe SM, Ramirez PT, Abu-Rustum NR. Innovative laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 9(6), 472–477 (2007).
  • Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 5331–5336 (2009).
  • Ndofor BT, Soliman PT, Schmeler KM, Nick AM, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT. Rate of port-site metastasis ins uncommon in patients undergoing robotic surgery for gynecological malignancies. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 21(5), 936–940 (2011).
  • Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Giles D, Noble BN, Kho RM, Magtibay PM. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and recurrence with laparoscopy, vaginal/laparoscopy and laparotomy. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 32(5), 476–480 (2011).
  • Alpa NM, Ramirez PT. The impact of robotic surgery on gynecologic oncology. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 22(3), 196–202 (2011).
  • Levinson K, Escobar P. In: Robotic Surgery: Applications and Advances. Kendoff D, Pearle AD (Eds). Future Science Group, London, UK (2013).
  • Escobar PF, Starks D, Fader AN, Catenacci M, Falcone T. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice surgery in gynecology. Fertil. Steril. 94(7), 2497–2502 (2010).
  • Fagotti A, Boruta D, Scambia G, Fanfani F, Paglia A, Escobar PF. First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 353.e1–e5 (2012).
  • Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD003677 (2009).
  • Fader AN, Cohen S, Escobar PF, Gunderson C. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 22, 331–338 (2010).
  • Uppal S, Frumovitz M, Escobar P, Ramirez PT. Laparoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Gynecology: Review of Literature and Available Technology. J. Minim. Invas. Gynecol. 18 (1), 12–23 (2010).
  • Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Giuseppe V et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil. Steril. 96(1), 255–259 (2011).
  • Hoyer-Sorensen C, Vistad I, Ballard K. Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial. Fertil. Steril. 98(4), 973–979 (2012).
  • Li M, Han Y, Feng YC. Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J. Int. Med. Res. 40(2), 701–708 (2012).
  • Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199, 360.e1–e9 (2008).
  • Eun Ji, Sang Wun Kim, et al. Robotic single-port transumbilical total hysterectomy: a pilot study. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 22(2), 120–126 (2011).
  • Fader, Amanda Nickles, Pedro F. Escobar. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol. Oncol. 114(2), 157–161 (2009).
  • Cela V, Freschi L, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Tana R, Pluchino N. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Surg. Endosc. (2013) ( Epub ahead of print).
  • Spinoglio G, Lenti LM, Maglione V et al. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC) versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): comparison of learning curves. First European experience. Surg. Endosc. 26(6), 1648–1655 (2012).
  • Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S et al. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: Cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg. Endosc. 25(11), 3566–3573 (2011).
  • Konstantinidis KM, Hirides P, Hirides S, Chrysocheris P, Georgiou M. Cholecystectomy using a novel Single-Site robotic platform early experience from 45 consecutive cases. Surg. Endosc. 26(9), 2687–2694 (2012).
  • Hagen ME, Meehan JJ, Inan I, Morel P. Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 22(6), 1505–1508 (2008).
  • Escobar, Pedro F, Haber GP et al. Single-port surgery: laboratory experience with the da vinci single-site platform. JSLS 15(2), 136–141 (2011).
  • Escobar PF, Kebria M, Falcone T. Evaluation of a novel single-port robotic platform in the cadaver model for the performance of various procedures in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol. Oncol. 120(3), 380–384 (2011).
  • Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39, 456–466 (1977).
  • Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch. Surg. 127, 392–399 (1992).
  • Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 546–553 (2003).
  • Zivanovic O, Khoury-Collado F, Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Management of Vulvar Carcinoma, Cervical Cancer, and Endometrial Cancer. Oncologist 14, 695–705 (2009).
  • Burke TW, Levenback C, Tomos C, Morris M, Wharton JT, Gershenson DM. Intra-abdominal lymphatic mapping to direct selective pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: results of a pilot study. Gynecol. Oncol. 62(2), 169–173 (1996).
  • Kang S, Yoo HJ, Hwang JH, Lim MC, Seo SS Park SY. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: meta-analysis of 26 studies. Gynecol. Oncol. 123, 522–527 (2011).
  • How J, Lau S, Press J et al. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node detection following intra-operative cervical injection for endometrial cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol. Oncol. 127, 332–337 (2012).
  • Solima E, Martinelli F, Ditto A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node in endometrial cancer by using hysteroscopic injection of radiolabeled tracer. Gynecol. Oncol. 126, 419–423 (2012).
  • Ballester M, Dubernard G, Lecuru F et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet 12, 469–476 (2011).
  • Diaz JP, Gemignani ML, Pandit-Taskar N et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of early-stage cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 120(3), 347–352 (2011).
  • Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L et al. Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis. Gynecol. Oncol. 127 (3), 462–466 (2012).
  • Abu-Rustum NR, Khoury-Collado F, Pandit-Taskar N et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: Is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma? Gynecol. Oncol. 113, 163–169 (2009).
  • Ballester M, Dubernard G, Rouzier R, Barranger E, Darai E. Use of the sentinel node procedure to stage endometrial cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15(5), 1523–1529 (2008).
  • Abu-Rustum N, Khoury-Collado F, Gemignani ML. Techniques of sentinel lymph node identification for early-stage cervical and uterine cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 111, S44–S50 (2008).
  • Speich R, Saesseli B, Hoffmann U, Neftel KA, Reichen J. Anaphylactoid reactions after indocyanine-green administration. Ann. Intern. Med. 109(4), 345–346 (1988).
  • Reuthebuch O, Haussler A, Genoni M et al. Novadaq SPY: intraoperative quality assessment in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 125, 418–424. (2004).
  • Kitai T, Inomoto T, Miwa M, Shikayama T. Fluorescence navigation with indocyanine green for detecting sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 12, 211–215 (2005).
  • Wishart GC, Loh SW, Jones L, Benson JR. A feasibility study (ICG-10) or indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence mapping for sentinel lymph node detection in early breast cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 38(8), 651–656 (2012).
  • Brouwer OR, Buckle T, Vermeeren L et al. Comparing the hybrid fluorescent-radioactive tracer indocyanine green-99 m Tc-nanocolloid with 99 m Tc-nonocolloid for sentinel node identification: a validation study using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT. J. Nucl. Med. 53(7), 1034–1040 (2012).
  • Holloway RW, MMolero Bravo RA et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging: a comparison of colorimetric and fluorescence imaging. Gynecol. Oncol. 126, 25–29 (2012).
  • Rossi EC, Ivanova A, Boggess JF. Robotically assisted flourescence-guided lymph node mapping with ICG for gynecologic malignancies: A feasibility study. Gynecol. Oncol. 124, 78–82 (2012).
  • Druzjanic N, Pogorelic Z, Perko Z, Mrklic I, Tomic S. Comparison of lateral thermal damage of the human peritoneum using monopolar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel and LigaSure. Cancer J. Surg. 55(5), 317–321 (2012).
  • Lantis JC II, Durville FM, Connolly R, Schwaitzberg SD. Comparison of coagulation modalities in surgery. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 8(6), 381–394 (1998).
  • Meehan JJ. The robotic Gyrus PK: a new articulating thermal sealing device and a preliminary series report. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 18(1), 183–185 (2008).
  • Intuitive Surgical Data Sheets. da Vinci Robotics. EndoWrist One Vessel Sealer for the da Vinci Si System.
  • Cormier B, Nezhat F, Sternchos J, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM Jr. Electrocautery-associated vascular injury during robotic-assisted surgery. Obstet. Gynecol. 120 (2 Pt 2), 49103 (2012).
  • Wu NP, Ou CS, Chen SL, Yen EY, Rowbotham. Complications and recommended practices for electrosurgery in laparoscopy. Am. J. Surg. 179(1), 67–73 (2000).
  • Ahlering TE, Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW. Overcoming obstacles: nerve-sparing issues in radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 22(4), 745–750 (2008).
  • Ikeda T, Kabasima A, Ueda N et al. Totally laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis achieved using a laparoscopic linear stapler: experience of a single institute. Surg. Today 42 (1), 41–45 (2012).
  • Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 93(8), 921–928 (2006).
  • Kracht M, Hay JM, Fagniez PL, Fingerhut A. Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: staples or hand-sewn? A prospective multicenter, randomized trial. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 8, 29–33.
  • Roscio F, Beroglio C, De Luca A, Frattini P, Scandrogio I. Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int. J. Surg. 10(6), 290–295 (2012).
  • Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F et al. Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. (2012) ( Epub ahead of print).
  • Iglesias DA, Ramirez PT. Role of minimally invasive surgery in staging of ovarian cancer. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 12(3), 217–229 (2011).
  • Magrina JH, Cetta RL, Chang YH, Guevara G, Magtibay PM. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. (2013) ( Epub ahead of print).
  • Vasilescu C, Tudor S, Popa M, Aldea B, Gluck G. Entirely robotic total pelvic exenteration. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. 21(4), e200–e202 (2011).

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.