Ultrasound and dermatology: basic principles and main applications in dermatologic research

References

• Jemec GB, Gniadecka M, Ulrich J. Ultrasound in dermatology. Part I. High frequency ultrasound. Eur. J. Dermatol. 10, 492–497 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander H, Miller DL. Determining skin thickness with pulsed ultra sound. J. Invest. Dermatol. 72, 17–19 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan CY, Statham B, Marks R, Payne PA. Skin thickness measurement by pulsed ultrasound: its reproducibility, validation and variability. Br. J. Dermatol. 106, 657–667 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikjøb G, Kassis V, Søndergaard J. Ultrasonic B-scanning of the human skin. An introduction of a new ultrasonic skin-scanner. Acta Derm. Venereol. 64(1), 67–70 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien WD Jr. Ultrasound—biophysics mechanisms. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 93(1–3), 212–255 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid-Wendtner MH, Burgdorf W. Ultrasound scanning in dermatology. Arch. Dermatol.141(2), 217–224 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasaitiene D, Valiukeviciene S, Linkeviciute G, Raisutis R, Jasiuniene E, Kazys R. Principles of high-frequency ultrasonography for investigation of skin pathology. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 25(4), 375–382 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortsman X, Wortsman J. Clinical usefulness of variable-frequency ultrasound in localized lesions of the skin. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 62(2), 247–256 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turlier V, Delalleau A, Casas C et al. Association between collagen production and mechanical stretching in dermal extracellular matrix: in vivo effect of cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler. A randomised, placebo-controlled study. J. Dermatol. Sci. 69(3), 187–194 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello G, Jackson IT, Keskin M et al. The use of polyacrylamide gel in soft-tissue augmentation: an experimental assessment. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 119(4), 1326–36 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenari S, Pagnoni A, Di Nardo A, Giannetti A. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of normal skin: variations according to age and sex. Skin Pharmacol. 7(4), 201–209 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bridal SL, Fournier C, Coron A, Leguerney I, Laugier P. Ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation (11-27 MHz) variation with collagen fiber distribution in ex vivo human dermis. Ultrason. Imaging. 28(1), 23–40 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Gammal S, El Gammal C, Kaspar K et al. Sonography of the skin at 100 MHz enables in vivo visualization of stratum corneum and viable epidermis in palmar skin and psoriatic plaques. J. Invest. Dermatol. 113(5), 821–829 (1999)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortsman X, Jemec GB. Ultrasound imaging of nails. Dermatol. Clin. 24(3), 323–328 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querleux B, Baldeweck T, Diridollou S et al. Skin from various ethnic origins and aging: an in vivo cross-sectional multimodality imaging study. Skin Res. Technol. 15(3), 306–313 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenari S, Giusti G, Bertoni L et al. Thickness and echogenicity of the skin in children as assessed by 20-MHz ultrasound. Dermatology 201(3), 218–222 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent A, Mistretta F, Bottigioli D et al. Echographic measurement of skin thickness in adults by high frequency ultrasound to assess the appropriate microneedle length for intradermal delivery of vaccines. Vaccine 25(34), 6423–6430 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller JM, Maibach HI. Age and skin structure and function, a quantitative approach (I): blood flow, pH, thickness, and ultrasound echogenicity. Skin Res. Technol. 11(4), 221–235 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalls LK, Randall Wickett R, Visscher MO. Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties. Skin Res. Technol. 12(1), 43–49 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gniadecka M, Jemec GBE. Quantitative evaluation of chronological aging and photoaging in vivo: studies on skin echogenicity and thickness. Br. J. Dermatol. 139, 815–821 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellacani G, Seidenari S. Variations in facial skin thickness and echogenicity with site and age. Acta Derm. Venereol. 79, 366–369 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisan D, Lupsor M, Boca A, Crisan M, Badea R. Ultrasonographic assessment of skin structure according to age. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 78(4), 519 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rigal J, Escoffier C, Querleux B, Faivre B, Agache P, Leveque JL. Assessment of aging of the human skin by in vivo ultrasonic imaging. J. Invest. Dermatol. 93, 621–625 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandby-Møller J, Wulf HC. Ultrasonographic subepidermal low-echogenic band, dependence of age and body site. Skin Res. Technol. 10(1), 57–63 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gniadecka M. Effects of ageing on dermal echogenicity. Skin Res. Technol. 7(3), 204–207 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard S, de Rigal J, de Lacharriere O, Berardesca E, Leveque JL. Noninvasive measurement of the effect of lifetime exposure to the sun on the aged skin. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 10, 164–169 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gniadecka M, Serup J, Søndergaard J. Age-related diurnal changes of dermal oedema: evaluation by high-frequency ultrasound. Br. J. Dermatol. 131(6), 849–855 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lever L. Kumar P. Marks R. Topical retinoic acid in the treatment of solar elastotic degeneration. Br. J. Dermatol. 122, 91–98 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody BR, McCarthy JE, Hruza GJ. Collagen remodeling after 585-nm pulsed dye laser irradiation: an ultrasonographic analysis. Dermatol. Surg. 29(10), 997–999 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobus KF, Dydymski T. Quantitative dermal measurements following treatment with AirGent. Aesthet. Surg. J. 30(5), 725–729 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisan D, Crisan M, Moldovan M, Lupsor M, Badea R. Ultrasonographic assessment of the cutaneous changes induced by topical flavonoid therapy. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 5, 7–13 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tierney EP, Hanke CW, Petersen J, Bartley T, Eckert JR, McCutchen C. Clinical and echographic analysis of ablative fractionated carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. Dermatol. Surg. 36(12), 2009–2021 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naouri M, Atlan M, Perrodeau E et al. High-resolution ultrasound imaging to demonstrate and predict efficacy of carbon dioxide fractional resurfacing laser treatment. Dermatol. Surg. 37(5), 596–603 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier N, Dahan S, Barneon G et al. Nonablative remodeling: clinical, histologic, ultrasound imaging, and profilometric evaluation of a 1540 nm Er: glass laser. Dermatol. Surg. 27(9), 799–806 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura T, Tsukahara K, Moriwaki S, Kitahara T, Sano T, Takema Y. Treatment of human skin with an extract of Fucus vesiculosus changes its thickness and mechanical properties. J. Cosmet. Sci. 53(1), 1–9 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zane C, Capezzera R, Sala R, Venturini M, Calzavara-Pinton P. Clinical and echographic analysis of photodynamic therapy using methylaminolevulinate as sensitizer in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin. Lasers Surg. Med. 39(3), 203–209 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herane MI, Orlandi C, Zegpi E, Valdés P, Anci? X. Clinical efficacy of adapalene (differin(®)) 0.3% gel in Chilean women with cutaneous photoaging. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 23(1), 57–64 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopaul R, Knaggs HE, Lephart JF, Holley KC, Gibson EM. An evaluation of the effect of a topical product containing salicin on the visible signs of human skin aging. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 9(3), 196–201 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Lindmark L, Arruda LH et al. Clinical, biometric and ultrasound assessment of the effects of daily use of a nutraceutical composed of lycopene, acerola extract, grape seed extract and Biomarine Complex in photoaged human skin. An. Bras. Dermatol. 87(1), 52–61 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marini A, Grether-Beck S, Jaenicke T et al. Pycnogenol® effects on skin elasticity and hydration coincide with increased gene expressions of collagen type I and hyaluronic acid synthase in women. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 25(2), 86–92 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacarrubba F, Tedeschi A, Nardone B, Micali G. Mesotherapy for skin rejuvenation: assessment of the subepidermal low-echogenic band by ultrasound evaluation with cross-sectional B-mode scanning. Dermatol. Ther. 21( Suppl. 21), S1–S5 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedelund L, Bjerring P, Egekvist H, Haedersdal M. Ablative versus non-ablative treatment of perioral rhytides. A randomized controlled trial with long-term blinded clinical evaluations and non-invasive measurements. Lasers Surg. Med. 38(2), 129–136 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukahara K, Osanai O, Hotta M et al. Relationship between the echogenicity of subcutaneous tissue and the depth of eye corner wrinkles. Skin Res. Technol. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00507.x (2011) ( Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Nürnberger F, Müller G. So-called cellulite: an invented disease. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 4(3), 221–229 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenbaum M, Prieto V, Hellmer J et al. An exploratory investigation of the morphology and biochemistry of cellulite. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101(7), 1934–1939 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortonne JP, Zartarian M, Verschoore M, Queille-Roussel C, Duteil L. Cellulite and skin ageing: is there any interaction? J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 22(7), 827–834 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielfeldt S, Buttgereit P, Brandt M, Springmann G, Wilhelm KP. Non-invasive evaluation techniques to quantify the efficacy of cosmetic anti-cellulite products. Skin Res. Technol. 14(3), 336–346 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucassen GW, van der Sluys WLN, van Herk JJ et al. The effectiveness of massage treatment on cellulite as monitored by ultrasound imaging. Skin Res. Technol. 3, 154–160 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smalls LK, Hicks M, Passeretti D et al. Effect of weight loss on cellulite: gynoid lypodystrophy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118(2), 510–516 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. P. Cellulite treatments: snake oils of skin science. Cosmetics Toiletries. 110, 61 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Bousquet-Rouaud R, Bazan M, Chaintreuil J, Echague A. High-frequency ultrasound evaluation of cellulite treated with the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser. J. Cosmet. Laser. Ther. 11(1), 34–44 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlosek RK, Woniak W, Malinowska S, Lewandowski M, Nowicki A. The effectiveness of anticellulite treatment using tripolar radiofrequency monitored by classic and high-frequency ultrasound. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 26(6), 696–703 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Bader T, Byrne A, Gillbro J et al. Effect of cosmetic ingredients as anticellulite agents: synergistic action of actives with in vitro and in vivo efficacy. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 11(1), 17–26 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleve M, Capra P, Pavanetto F, Perugini P.Ultrasound and 3D Skin Imaging: Methods to Evaluate Efficacy of Striae Distensae Treatment. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2012, 673706 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Orlandi C, Cardenas G, Sazunic I, Jemec GB. Ultrasound detection and identification of cosmetic fillers in the skin. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 26(3), 292–301 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grippaudo FR, Mattei M. High-frequency sonography of temporary and permanent dermal fillers. Skin Res. Technol. 16(3), 265–269 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheels P, Besse S, Flynn TC, Sarazin D, Elbaz Y. Superficial dermal injection of hyaluronic acid soft tissue fillers: comparative ultrasound study. Dermatol. Surg. 38(7 Pt 2), 1162–1169 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelke LW, Van Den Elzen HJ, Erkamp PP, Neumann HA. Use of ultrasound to provide overall information on facial fillers and surrounding tissue. Dermatol. Surg. 36( Suppl. 36), 1843–1851 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortsman X, Wortsman J. Polyacrylamide fillers on skin ultrasound. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 26(5), 660–661 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josse G, Haftek M, Gensanne D et al. Follow up study of dermal hyaluronic acid injection by high frequency ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Dermatol. Sci. 57(3), 214–216 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SR, Bolton PA, Downie J. Use of high-frequency ultrasound in the assessment of injectable dermal fillers. Skin Res. Technol. 14(3), 320–323 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valantin MA, Aubron-Olivier C, Ghosn J et al. Polylactic acid implants (New-Fill) to correct facial lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients: results of the open-label study VEGA. AIDS 17(17), 2471–2477 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignatti M, Pedone A, Baccarani A et al. High-density hyaluronic acid for the treatment of HIV-related facial lipoatrophy. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 36(1), 180–185 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Santis G, Pignatti M, Baccarani A et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel injection in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-related facial lipoatrophy: a 5-year follow-up. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 129(1), 101–109 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard J, Serup J, Tikjøb G. Ultrasonic A- and B-scanning in clinical and experimental dermatology. Acta Derm. Venereol. Suppl. (Stockh). 120, 76–82 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akesson A, Hesselstrand R, Scheja A, Wildt M. Longitudinal development of skin involvement and reliability of high frequency ultrasound in systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 63(7), 791–796 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselstrand R, Scheja A, Wildt M, Akesson A. High-frequency ultrasound of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis reflects oedema, extension and severity in early disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 47(1), 84–87 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedky MM, Fawzy SM, El Baki NA, El Eishi NH, El Bohy Ael M. Systemic sclerosis: an ultrasonographic study of skin and subcutaneous tissue in relation to clinical findings. Skin Res. Technol. 19(1), e78–84 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn A, Haust M, Ruland V et al. Effect of bosentan on skin fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis: a prospective, open-label, non-comparative trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 49(7), 1336–1345 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung L, Denton CP, Distler O, Furst DE, Khanna D, Merkel PA. Clinical trial design in scleroderma: where are we and where do we go next? Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 30(2 Suppl. 71), S97–102 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li SC, Liebling MS. The use of Doppler ultrasound to evaluate lesions of localized scleroderma. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 11(3), 205–211 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li SC, Liebling MS, Haines KA, Weiss JE, Prann A. Initial evaluation of an ultrasound measure for assessing the activity of skin lesions in juvenile localized scleroderma. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken). 63(5), 735–742 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Zawahry MB, Abdel El-Hameed El-Cheweikh HM, Abd-El-Rahman Ramadan S, Ahmed Bassiouny D, Mohamed Fawzy M. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in the diagnosis of skin diseases. Eur. J. Dermatol. 17(6), 469–475 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter A, Gambichler T, Breuckmann F et al. Pulsed high-dose corticosteroids combined with low-dose methotrexate in severe localized scleroderma. Arch. Dermatol. 141(7), 847–852 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann K, Gerbaulet U, el-Gammal S, Altmeyer P. 20-MHz B-mode ultrasound in monitoring the course of localized scleroderma (morphea). Acta Derm. Venereol. Suppl. (Stockh). 164, 3–16 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su O, Onsun N, Onay HK et al. Effectiveness of medium-dose ultraviolet A1 phototherapy in localized scleroderma. Int. J. Dermatol. 50(8), 1006–1013 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosnes A, Anglade MC, Revuz J, Radier C. Thirteen-megahertz ultrasound probe: its role in diagnosing localized scleroderma. Br. J. Dermatol. 148(4), 724–729 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Sazunic I, Carreño L. Activity assessment in morphea using color Doppler ultrasound. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 65(5), 942–948 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkachaisri T, Vilaiyuk S, Li S et al. The localized scleroderma skin severity index and physician global assessment of disease activity: a work in progress toward development of localized scleroderma outcome measures. J. Rheumatol. 36(12), 2819–2829 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessonart MN, Macedo N, Carmona C. High resolution B-scan ultrasound of hypertrophic scars. Skin Res. Technol. 11(3), 185–188 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraccalvieri M, Sarno A, Gasperini S et al. Can ’single use negative pressure wound therapy’ be an alternative method to manage keloid scarring? A preliminary report of a clinical and ultrasound/colour-power-doppler study. Int. Wound J. 10(3), 340–304 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan HH, Wong DS, Ho WS, Lam LK, Wei W. The use of pulsed dye laser for the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars in chinese persons. Dermatol. Surg. 30(7), 987–994 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry DM, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. Current tools for noninvasive objective assessment of skin scars. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126(3), 912–923 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedelec B, Correa JA, Rachelska G, Armour A, La Salle L. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity. J. Burn Care Res. 29(3), 501–511 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SR, Hampton S, Martin R. Non invasive assessment of negative pressure wound therapy using high frequency diagnostic ultrasound: oedema reduction and new tissue accumulation. Int. Wound J. 10(4), 383–388 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoi N, Yoshimura K, Kadono T et al. Ultrasound assessment of deep tissue injury in pressure ulcers: possible prediction of pressure ulcer progression. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 124(2), 540–550 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraccalvieri M, Zingarelli E, Ruka E et al. Negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam: histological, immunohistochemical and ultrasonography morphological analysis of the granulation tissue and scar tissue. Preliminary report of a clinical study. Int. Wound J. 8(4), 355–364 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippon MG, Springett K, Walmsley R, Patrick K, Millson S. Ultrasound assessment of skin and wound tissue: comparison with histology. Skin Res. Technol. 4, 147–154 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyson M, Moodley S, Verjee L, Verling W, Weinman J, Wilson P. Wound healing assessment using 20 MHz ultrasound and photography. Skin Res. Technol. 9(2), 116–121 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann RC, Ellis CN, Fitting DW, Ho VC, Voorhees JJ. Measurement of epidermal thickness in normal skin and psoriasis with high-frequency ultrasound. Skin Pharmacol. 1(2), 128–136 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann K, Dirschka T, Schwarze H et al. 20 MHz sonography, colorimetry and image analysis in the evaluation of psoriasis vulgaris. J. Dermatol. Sci. 9(2), 103–110 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod AD, Dwyer CM, Weller R, Cox DH, Price R. A comparison of subjective and objective measures of reduction of psoriasis with the use of ultrasound, reflectance colorimetry, computerized video image analysis, and nitric oxide production. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 37(1), 51–57 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez M, De Angelis R, Bernardini ML et al. Clinical, power Doppler sonography and histological assessment of the psoriatic plaque: short-term monitoring in patients treated with etanercept. Br. J. Dermatol. 164(1), 33–37 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisondi P, Idolazzi L, Girolomoni G. Ultrasonography reveals nail thickening in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 304(9), 727–732 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin SZ, Castillo-Gallego C, Ash ZR et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of nail in psoriatic disease shows a link between onychopathy and distal interphalangeal joint extensor tendon enthesopathy. Dermatology 225(3), 231–235 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez M, Wortsman X, Filippucci E, De Angelis R, Filosa G, Grassi W. High-frequency sonography in the evaluation of psoriasis: nail and skin involvement. J. Ultrasound Med. 28(11), 1569–1574 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husein El-Ahmed H, Garrido-Pareja F, Ruiz-Carrascosa JC, Naranjo-Sintes R. Vessel resistance to blood flow in the nailfold in patients with psoriasis: a prospective case-control echo Doppler-based study. Br. J. Dermatol. 166(1), 54–58 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Xu X, Hu C et al. A high-frequency, high frame rate duplex ultrasound linear array imaging system for small animal imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 57(7), 1548–1557 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar