http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-3080
References
- Diamond DM, Ravnskov U. How statistical deception created the appearance that statins are safe and effective in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(2):201–210.
- Rajkumar SV, Sampathkumar P, Gustafson AB. Number needed to treat is a simple measure of treatment efficacy for clinicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(6):357–359.
- Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(26):1728–1733.
- Smeeth L, Haines A, Ebrahim S. Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses–sometimes informative, usually misleading. BMJ. 1999;318(7197):1548–1551.
- Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):77–84.
- Crowson CS, Therneau TM, Matteson EL, et al. Primer: demystifying risk–understanding and communicating medical risks. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007;3(3):181–187.
- Schechtman E. Odds ratio, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and the number needed to treat–which of these should we use? Value Health. 2002;5(5):431–436.
- Gigerenzer G, Wegwarth O, Feufel M. Misleading communication of risk. BMJ. 2010;341:c4830.