Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology Volume 8, 2013 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
32
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Assessment of labor progress

Mary Higgins Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. [email protected]; Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. [email protected]
&
Dan Farine Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Pages 83-95 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS et al.; Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 26(8), 735–742 (2004).
  • National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8–10, 2010. Semin. Perinatol. 34(5), 351–365 (2010).
  • Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2(8452), 436–437 (1985).
  • Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin. Perinatol. 30(5), 235–241 (2006).
  • Cheng YW, Delaney SS, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 201(5), 477.e1–477.e7 (2009).
  • Cunningham FG, Williams JW. Normal labor and delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics. Cunningham FG Leveno K, Bloom S, Hauth J, Rouse D, Spong C (Eds). McGraw Hill, NY, USA, 374–409 (2006).
  • American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Dystocia and Augmentation of Labor. DC, USA (2003).
  • Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstet. Gynecol. 95(4), 589–595 (2000).
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Social Trends. Canberra, Australia, Cat No. 4102.0 (2007).
  • Athukorala C, Rumbold AR, Willson KJ, Crowther CA. The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10, 56 (2010).
  • Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 6(6), 567–589 (1955).
  • Lavender T, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Campbell E, Alfirevic Z. Progress of first stage of labour for multiparous women: an observational study. BJOG 112(12), 1663–1665 (2005).
  • Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 187(4), 824–828 (2002).
  • Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Fraser W. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 115(4), 705–710 (2010).
  • Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Zhao Q, Macones GA. Impact of fetal gender on the labor curve. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206(4), 335.e1–335.e5 (2012).
  • Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 173(3 Pt 1), 942–945 (1995).
  • Luria O, Jaffa A, Farine D et al. Effects of the individual uterine contraction on fetal head descent and cervical dilatation during the active stage of labor. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 144(Suppl. 1), S101–S107 (2009).
  • Buchmann EJ, Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. BJOG 114(7), 833–837 (2007)
  • Tuffnell DJ, Bryce F, Johnson N, Lilford RJ. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet 2(8671), 1089–1090 (1989).
  • Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 177(5), 1024–1029 (1997).
  • Cahill AG, Duffy CR, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Macones GA. Number of cervical examinations and risk of intrapartum maternal fever. Obstet. Gynecol. 119(6), 1096–1101 (2012).
  • Letic M. Inaccuracy in cervical dilatation assessment and the progress of labour monitoring. Med. Hypotheses 60(2), 199–201 (2003).
  • Kok FT, Wallenburg HC, Wladimiroff JW. Ultrasonic measurement of cervical dilatation during labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 126(2), 288–290 (1976).
  • Lucidi RS, Blumenfeld LA, Chez RA. Cervimetry: a review of methods for measuring cervical dilatation during labor. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 55(5), 312–320 (2000).
  • Letic M. Simple instrument for measuring cervical dilatation during labour. Physiol. Meas. 26(1), N1–N7 (2005).
  • Sharf Y, Farine D, Batzalel M et al. Continuous monitoring of cervical dilatation and fetal head station during labor. Med. Eng. Phys. 29(1), 61–71 (2007).
  • Barnea O, Luria O, Jaffa A, Stark M, Fox HE, Farine D. Relations between fetal head descent and cervical dilatation during individual uterine contractions in the active stage of labor. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 35(4), 654–659 (2009).
  • Nizard J, Haberman S, Paltieli Y et al. How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal examination with spatial position-tracking ruler. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200(4), 402.e1–402.e4 (2009).
  • Crichton D. A reliable method of establishing the level of the fetal head in obstetrics. South African Med. J. 48(18), 784–787 (1974).
  • Notelowitz M. The graphic monitoring of labour. South African J Obstet. Gynaecol. 11, 3–10 (1973).
  • Buchmann EJ, Guidozzi F. Level of fetal head above brim: comparison of three transabdominal methods of estimation, and interobserver agreement. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 27(8), 787–790 (2007).
  • Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 192(3), 868–874 (2005).
  • Carollo TC, Reuter JM, Galan HL, Jones RO. Defining fetal station. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 191(5), 1793–1796 (2004).
  • Pearl ML, Roberts JM, Laros RK, Hurd WW. Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. J. Reprod. Med. 38(12), 955–961 (1993).
  • Phillips RD, Freeman M. The management of the persistent occiput posterior position. A review of 552 consecutive cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 43(2), 171–177 (1974).
  • Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM, Weiner CP. Uterine contractility in women whose fetus is delivered in the occipitoposterior position. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 188(3), 734–739 (2003).
  • Cunningham FG, Norman FG, Leveno K, Gilstrap L, Hauth J, Wenstrom K. Dystocia: abnormal presentation, position and development of the fetus. In: Williams Obstetrics (21st Edition). Cunningham FG, Norman FG, Leveno K, Gilstrap L, Hauth J, Wenstrom K (Eds). McGraw Hill, NY, USA (2001).
  • Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 19(3), 264–268 (2002).
  • Blasi I, D’Amico R, Fenu V et al. Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 35(2), 210–215 (2010).
  • VBAC (vaginal birth after cesareans): are cost concerns outweighing possible safety risks? Hosp. Case Manag. 4(11), 161–164 (1996).
  • Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 12(3), 172–177 (2002).
  • Wray S, Kupittayanant S, Shmygol A, Smith RD, Burdyga T. The physiological basis of uterine contractility: a short review. Exp. Physiol. 86(2), 239–246 (2001).
  • Bakker JJ, Verhoeven CJ, Janssen PF et al. Outcomes after internal versus external tocodynamometry for monitoring labor. N. Engl. J. Med. 362(4), 306–313 (2010).
  • Friedman EA. Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 8(6), 691–703 (1956).
  • Friedman EA. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Managment (1st Edition). Appleton-Century-Crofts, NY, USA (1967).
  • Friedman EA. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management (2nd Edition). Appleton-Century-Crofts, NY, USA (1978).
  • Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Hudson C, Isler CM, Larmon JE, Perry KG Jr. Lack of utility of standard labor curves in the prediction of progression during labor induction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 182(6), 1520–1526 (2000).
  • Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet. Gynecol. 105(4), 698–704 (2005).
  • World Health Organization Partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Lancet 343(8910), 1399–1404 (1994).
  • Steer P, Flint C. ABC of labour care: physiology and management of normal labour. BMJ 318(7186), 793–796 (1999).
  • CSAPO A. Progesterone block. Am. J. Anat. 98(2), 273–291 (1956).
  • Mesiano S, Wang Y, Norwitz ER. Progesterone receptors in the human pregnancy uterus: do they hold the key to birth timing? Reprod. Sci. 18(1), 6–19 (2011).
  • Kamel RM. The onset of human parturition. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 281(6), 975–982 (2010).
  • Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Dystocia. Clinical Practice Guidelines Number 40 (1995).
  • Federal Ministry of Health WHO. First Stage of Labor, Partograph and Abnormal First Stage of Labor. Training Manual on Emergency Obstetrics Care as an Expanded Lifesaving Skill for Doctors. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 4–50 (2003).
  • O’Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active management of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet. Gynecol. 63(4), 485–490 (1984).
  • Clapp JF 3rd. The course of labor after endurance exercise during pregnancy. Am. J Obstet Gynecol. 163(6 Pt 1), 1799–1805 (1990).
  • Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean section rate? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 15(1), 179–194 (2001).
  • Alfirevic Z, Edwards G, Platt MJ. The impact of delivery suite guidelines on intrapartum care in ‘standard primigravida’. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 115(1), 28–31 (2004).
  • Kjaergaard H, Dykes AK, Ottesen B, Olsen J. Risk indicators for dystocia in low-risk nulliparous women: a study on lifestyle and anthropometrical factors. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 30(1), 25–29 (2010).
  • Treacy A, Robson M, O’Herlihy C. Dystocia increases with advancing maternal age. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195(3), 760–763 (2006).
  • Vahratian A, Zhang J, Hasling J, Troendle JF, Klebanoff MA, Thorp JM Jr. The effect of early epidural versus early intravenous analgesia use on labor progression: a natural experiment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 191(1), 259–265 (2004).
  • Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, Nyberg P, Dykes AK. Obstetric risk indicators for labour dystocia in nulliparous women: a multi-centre cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8, 45 (2008).
  • Hunter CA Jr. Uterine motility studies during labor. Observations on bilateral sympathetic nerve block in the normal and abnormal first stage of labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 85, 681–686 (1963).
  • Gambling DR, Sharma SK, Ramin SM et al. A randomized study of combined spinal-epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine during labor: impact on cesarean delivery rate. Anesthesiology 89(6), 1336–1344 (1998).
  • Robson MBP, McParland P, McQuillan C, O’Neill M. Epidural analgesia need not influence the spontaneous delivery rate. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 168, 364 (1993).
  • Norris MA. Analgesia and the outcome of labor. Clinical Forum/Pro-Con. SOAP Newslett. 4–7 (1996).
  • Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (12), CD000331 (2011).
  • Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Savitz DA, Siega-Riz AM. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women. Obstet. Gynecol. 104(5 Pt 1), 943–951 (2004).
  • Walsh J, Foley M, O’Herlihy C. Dystocia correlates with body mass index in both spontaneous and induced nulliparous labors. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 24(6), 817–821 (2011).
  • Norman SM, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Caughey AB, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. The effects of obesity on the first stage of labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 120(1), 130–135 (2012).
  • Mulik V, Usha Kiran TS, Bethal J, Bhal PS. The outcome of macrosomic fetuses in a low risk primigravid population. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 80(1), 15–22 (2003).
  • Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R. Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J. Perinat. Med. 32(2), 155–161 (2004).
  • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 150(2), 535–540 (1984).
  • Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Cahill AG. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 119(6), 1113–1118 (2012).
  • Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(4), 252–263, W53 (2009).
  • Zhu BP, Grigorescu V, Le T et al. Labor dystocia and its association with interpregnancy interval. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195(1), 121–128 (2006).
  • Berg-Lekås ML, Högberg U, Winkvist A. Familial occurrence of dystocia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 179(1), 117–121 (1998).
  • Algovik M, Nilsson E, Cnattingius S, Lichtenstein P, Nordenskjöld A, Westgren M. Genetic influence on dystocia. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 83(9), 832–837 (2004).
  • Brennan DJ, McGee SF, Rexhepaj E, O’Connor DP, Robson M, O’Herlihy C. Identification of a myometrial molecular profile for dystocic labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11, 74 (2011).
  • Bryant AS, Washington S, Kuppermann M, Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Quality and equality in obstetric care: racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 23(5), 454–462 (2009).
  • Freitas PF, Drachler Mde L, Leite JC, Marshall T. Inequalities in cesarean delivery rates by ethnicity and hospital accessibility in Brazil. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 107(3), 198–201 (2009).
  • Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193(3 Pt 2), 1016–1023 (2005).
  • Walsh J, Mahony R, Armstrong F, Ryan G, O’Herlihy C, Foley M. Ethnic variation between white European women in labour outcomes in a setting in which the management of labour is standardised – a healthy migrant effect? BJOG 118(6), 713–718 (2011).
  • Baskett TF. Obstetric care in the central Canadian Arctic. Br. Med. J. 2(6143), 1001–1004 (1978).
  • Gebbie D. Reproductive Anthropology – Descent Through Woman. Wiley, NY, USA (1981).
  • Roy RP. A Darwinian view of obstructed labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 101(2), 397–401 (2003).
  • Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L et al.; Magpie Trial Collaboration Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 359(9321), 1877–1890 (2002).
  • Han S, Crowther CA, Moore V. Magnesium maintenance therapy for preventing preterm birth after threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (7), CD000940 (2010).
  • Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3, CD001233 (2012).
  • Philpott RH. Obstructed labour. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 9(3), 625–640 (1982).
  • Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae II. The action line and treatment of abnormal labour. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 79(7), 599–602 (1972).
  • Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. I. The alert line for detecting abnormal labour. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 79(7), 592–598 (1972).
  • Impey L, Hobson J, O’Herlihy C. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183(2), 438–443 (2000).
  • ACOG. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 114(2 Pt 1), 386–397 (2009).
  • Mori R, Tokumasu H, Pledge D, Kenyon S. High dose versus low dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (10), CD007201 (2011).
  • Zhang J, Branch DW, Ramirez MM, Laughon SK, Reddy U, Hoffman M et al. Oxytocin regimen for labor augmentation, labor progression, and perinatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 118(2 Pt 1), 249–256 (2011).
  • Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Gilstrap LC 3rd, Strickland DM, Vance P. Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin induction/augmentation. Obstet. Gynecol. 68(3), 305–309 (1986).
  • Dawood MY, Ylikorkala O, Trivedi D, Gupta R. Oxytocin levels and disappearance rate and plasma follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone after oxytocin infusion in men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 50(2), 397–400 (1980).
  • Farine D, Shenhav M, Barnea O, Jaffa A, Fox HE. The need for a new outlook on labor monitoring. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 19(3), 161–164 (2006).

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.