Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics

References

• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han DK, Eng J, Zhou H, Aebersold R. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol.19(10), 946–951 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(5), 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Vitek O, Aebersold R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4(10), 787–797 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson EL, Xia Q, Wang T, Leigh JA, Hackett M. Comparison of spectral counting and metabolic stable isotope labeling for use with quantitative microbial proteomics. Analyst131(12), 1335–1341 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usaite R, Wohlschlegel J, Venable JD et al. Characterization of global yeast quantitative proteome data generated from the wild-type and glucose repression saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: the comparison of two quantitative methods. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 266–275 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox B, Kislinger T, Emili A. Integrating gene and protein expression data: pattern analysis and profile mining. Methods35(3), 303–314 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutillas PR, Vanhaesebroeck B. Quantitative profile of five murine core proteomes using label-free functional proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(9), 1560–1573 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Hwang SI, Rezaul K et al. Global survey of human T leukemic cells by integrating proteomics and transcriptomics profiling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(8), 1343–1353 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang SK, Darfler MM, Nicholl MB et al. LC/MS-based quantitative proteomic analysis of paraffin-embedded archival melanomas reveals potential proteomic biomarkers associated with metastasis. PLoS ONE4(2), e4430 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niittylä T, Fuglsang AT, Palmgren MG, Frommer WB, Schulze WX. Temporal analysis of sucrose-induced phosphorylation changes in plasma membrane proteins of Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(10), 1711–1726 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Gonzales-Vigil E, Wilkerson CG, Howe GA. Stability of plant defense proteins in the gut of insect herbivores. Plant Physiol.143(4), 1954–1967 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wepf A, Glatter T, Schmidt A, Aebersold R, Gstaiger M. Quantitative interaction proteomics using mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods6(3), 203–205 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han MH, Hwang S-I, Roy DB et al. Proteomic analysis of active multiple sclerosis lesions reveals therapeutic targets. Nature451, 1076–1081 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burande CF, Heuzé ML, Lamsoul I et al. A label-free quantitative proteomic strategy to identify E3 ubiquitin ligase substrates targeted to proteasome degradation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(7), 1719–1727 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayya V, Lundgren DH, Hwang S-I, Rezaul K, Wu L, Han DK. Large-scale quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of T-cell receptor signaling: system-wide modulation of protein-protein interaction mediated by site-specific phosphorylation. Sci. Signal.2(84), ra46 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebecchi KR, Wenke JL, Go EP, Desaire H. Label-free quantitation: a new glycoproteomics approach. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.20(6), 1048–1059 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin Y, Schwarz E, Wang L, Leweke FM, Bahn S. Label-free LC-MS/MS quantitative proteomics for large-scale biomarker discovery in complex samples. J. Sep. Sci.30(14), 2198–2203 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarenko PV, Chelius D, Shaler TA. Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.74(18), 4741–4749 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem.76(14), 4193–4201 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colinge J, Chiappe D, Lagache S, Moniatte M, Bougueleret L. Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores. Anal. Chem.77(2), 596–606 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas W, Faherty BK, Gerber SA et al. Optimization and use of peptide mass measurement accuracy in shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(7), 1326–1337 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.389(4), 1017–1031 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman RH, Carruthers R, Hoyes JB et al. A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.13(7), 792–803 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JC, Denny R, Dorschel CA et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. Anal. Chem.77(7), 2187–2200 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geromanos SJ, Vissers JPC, Silva JC et al. The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS. Proteomics9(6), 1683–1695 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VJ, Thalassinos K, Slade SE et al. A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches. J. Proteome Res.8(7), 3752–3759 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable JD, Wohlschlegel J, McClatchy DB, Park SK, Yates JR 3rd. Relative quantitation of stable isotope labeled peptides using a linear ion trap–Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem.79(8), 3056–3064 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 51–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zybailov B, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. Anal. Chem.77(19), 6218–6224 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SK, Venable JD, Xu T, Yates JR 3rd. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods5(4), 319–322 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar C, Mann M. Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics datasets. FEBS Lett.583(11), 1703–1712 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• America AH, Cordewener JH. Comparative LC-MS: a landscape of peaks and valleys. Proteomics8(4), 731–749 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(10), 1487–1502 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature425(6959), 737–741 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang SI, Lundgren DH, Mayya V et al. Systematic characterization of nuclear proteome during apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(6), 1131–1145 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen EI, Cociorva D, Norris JL, Yates JR 3rd. Optimization of mass spectrometry-compatible surfactants for shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res.6(7), 2529–2538 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Zhang J, Wang J. Relationship between sample loading amount and peptide identification and its effects on quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem.81(4), 1307–1314 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol.25(1), 117–124 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick P, Schirle M, Chen SS et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.25(1), 125–131 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz E, Levin Y, Wang L, Leweke FM, Bahn S. Peptide correlation: a means to identify high quality quantitative information in large-scale proteomic studies. J. Sep. Sci.30(14), 2190–2197 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wen Z, Washburn MP, Florens L. Effect of dynamic exclusion duration on spectral count based quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem.81(15), 6317–6326 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Daly DS, Springer DL, Miller JH. The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by LC/MS/MS. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 164–169 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zybailov B, Mosley AL, Sardiu ME, Coleman MK, Florens L, Washburn MP. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res.5(9), 2339–2347 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly DS, Anderson KK, Panisko EA et al. Mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC-MS proteomics studies. J. Proteome Res.7(3), 1209–1217 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braisted JC, Kuntumalla S, Vogel C et al. The APEX quantitative proteomics tool: generating protein quantitation estimates from LC-MS/MS proteomics results. BMC Bioinformatics9, 529–539 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.75(17), 4646–4658 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis20(18), 3551–3567 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian M, Sleat DE, Zheng H, Moore D, Lobel P. Proteomics analysis of serum from mutant mice reveals lysosomal proteins selectively transported by each of the two mannose 6-phosphate receptors. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(1), 58–70 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JW, Sullivan MJ, Cagney G. Computational methods for the comparative quantitation of proteins in label-free LCn-MS experiments. Brief Bioinform.9(2), 156–165 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavelka N, Fournier ML, Swanson SK et al. Statistical similarities between transcriptomics and quantitative shotgun proteomics data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(4), 631–644 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Fermin D, Nesvizhskii AI. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(12), 2373–2385 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappsilber J, Ryder U, Lamond AI, Mann M. Large-scale proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome. Genome Res.12(8), 1231–1245 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, Rappsilber J, Mann M. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(9), 1265–1272 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell DW, Weaver CM, Jennings JL et al. Cluster analysis of mass spectrometry data reveals a novel component of SAGA. Mol. Cell. Biol.24(16), 7249–7259 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Kim MJ, Cheng D, Duong DM, Gygi SP, Sheng M. Semiquantitative proteomic analysis of rat forebrain postsynaptic density fractions by mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem.279(20), 21003–21011 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asara JM, Christofk HR, Freimark LM, Cantley LC. A label-free quantitation method by MS/MS TIC compared to SILAC and spectral counting in a proteomics screen. Proteomics8(5), 994–999 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders SL, Jennings J, Canutescu A, Link AJ, Weil PA. Proteomics of the eukaryotic transcription machinery: identification of proteins associated with components of yeast TFIID by multidimensional mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Biol.22(13), 4723–4738 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson SE, Chu Y, Ozias-Akins P, Thelen JJ. Validation of gel-free, label-free quantitative proteomics approaches: applications for seed allergen profiling. J. Proteomics72(3), 555–566 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gramolini AO, Kislinger T, Alikhani-Koopaei R et al. Comparative proteomics profiling of a phospholamban mutant mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy reveals progressive intracellular stress responses. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(3), 519–533 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allet N, Barrillat N, Baussant T et al.In vitro and in silico processes to identify differentially expressed proteins. Proteomics4(8), 2333–2351 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu X, Gharib SA, Green PS et al. Spectral index for assessment of differential protein expression in shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res.7(3), 845–854 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florens L, Washburn MP, Raine JD et al. A proteomic view of the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Nature419(6906), 520–526 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao B-B, Stuart L, Feener EP. Label-free quantitative analysis of one-dimensional PAGE LC/MS/MS proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(12), 2399–2409 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, VerBerkmoes NC, Langston MA, Uberbacher E, Hettich RL, Samatova NF. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res.5(11), 2909–2918 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kislinger T, Cox B, Kannan A et al. Global survey of organ and organelle protein expression in mouse: combined proteomic and transcriptomic profiling. Cell125(1), 173–186 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist A, Au CE, Hiding J et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis of the secretory pathway. Cell127(6), 1265–1281 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turck CW, Falick AM, Kowalak JA et al. ABRF-PRG2006 study: relative protein quantitation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(8), 1291–1298 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantitation of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(12), 6940–6945 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wepf A, Glatter T, Schmidt A, Aebersold R, Gstaiger M. Quantitative interaction proteomics using mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods6(3), 203–205 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon RJ, Doherty MK, Pratt JM, Gaskell SJ. Multiplexed absolute quantitation in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides. Nat. Methods2(8), 587–589 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun V, Dupuis A, Adrait A et al. Isotope-labeled protein standards: toward absolute quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(12), 2139–2149 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain N, Thatte J, Braciale T, Ley K, O’Connell M, Lee JK. Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays. Bioinformatics19(15), 1945–1951 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, UK (1925).
   Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry (3rd Edition). WH Freeman and Company, NY, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Audic S, Claverie JM. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res.7(10), 986–995 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho PC, Fischer JS, Chen EI, Yates JR 3rd, Barbosa VC. PatternLab for proteomics: a tool for differential shotgun proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics9, 316–329 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavelka N, Pelizzola M, Vizzardelli C et al. A power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics5, 203–214 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parmigiani G, Garrett ES, Irizarry RA, Zeger SL. The Analysis of Gene Expression Data. Springer-Verlag, NY, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Efron B. Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: the choice of a null hypothesis. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.99(465), 96–104 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B57(1), 289–300 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98(9), 5116–5121 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(16), 9440–9445 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant GR, Liu J, Stoeckert CJ Jr. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data. Bioinformatics21(11), 2684–2690 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Pan W, Khodursky AB. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data. Bioinformatics21(23), 4280–4288 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabb DL. What’s driving false discovery rates?. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 45–46 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Käll L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 29–34 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käll L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 40–44 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Wang Z, Shankar G, Zhang X, Li L. A hierarchical statistical model to assess the confidence of peptides and proteins inferred from tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics24(2), 202–208 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang J, Ma J, Dou L et al. Bayesian nonparametric model for the validation of peptide identification in shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(3), 547–557 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oberg AL, Vitek O. Statistical design of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. J. Proteome Res.8(5), 2144–2156 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar