Puzzle of protein complexes in vivo: a present and future challenge for functional proteomics

References

• Kobayashi Y, Weigel D. Move on up, it’s time for change – mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. Genes Dev.21, 2371–2384 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Z, Ghosh A. A calcium-dependent switch in a CREST–BRG1 complex regulates activity-dependent gene expression. Neuron60, 775–787 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Michaud GA, Snyder M. Proteomic approaches for the global analysis of proteins. Biotechniques33, 1308–1316 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souchelnytskyi S. Proteomics in studies of signal transduction in epithelial cells. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia7, 359–371 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• de la Fuente van Bentem S, Mentzen WI, de la Fuente A et al. Towards functional phosphoproteomics by mapping differential phosphorylation events in signalling networks. Proteomics8, 4453–4465 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lecaudey V, Cakan-Akdogan G, Norton WH et al. Dynamic FGF signaling couples morphogenesis and migration in the zebrafish lateral line primordium. Development135, 2695–2705 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeifer AC, Timmer J, Klingmüller U. Systems biology of JAK/STAT signalling. Essays Biochem.45, 109–120 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zak DE, Aderem A. Systems biology of innate immunity. Immunol. Rev.227, 264–282 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlieker CD, Van der Veen AG, Damon JR et al. A functional proteomics approach links the ubiquitin-related modifier Urm1 to a tRNA modification pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 18255–18260 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza TA, Chen X, Guo Y et al. Proteomic identification and functional validation of activins and bone morphogenetic protein 11 as candidate novel muscle mass regulators. Endocrinology22, 2689–2702 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Brown KA, Ham AJ, Clark CN et al. Identification of novel Smad2 and Smad3 associated proteins in response to TGF-β1. J. Cell. Biochem.105, 596–611 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright CW, Duckett CS. The aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator alters CD30-mediated NF-βB-dependent transcription. Science323, 251–255 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markillie LM, Lin CT, Adkins JN et al. Simple protein complex purification and identification method for high-throughput mapping of protein interaction networks. J. Proteome Res.4, 268–274 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wu F, Wang P, Young LC et al. Proteome-wide identification of novel binding partners to the oncogenic fusion gene protein, NPM-ALK, using tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Am. J. Pathol.174, 361–370 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Zada AA, Pulikkan JA, Bararia D et al. Proteomic discovery of Max as a novel interacting partner of C/EBPα: a Myc/Max/Mad link. Leukemia20, 2137–2146 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpe K. Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.60, 523–533 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier N, Krpic S, Rodriguez P et al. Novel binding partners of Ldb1 are required for haematopoietic development. Development133, 4913–4923 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henkin JA, Jennings ME, Matthews DE et al. Mass processing – an improved technique for protein identification with mass spectrometry data. J. Biomol. Tech.15, 230–237 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Orrù S, Aspesi A, Armiraglio M et al. Analysis of the ribosomal protein S19 interactome. Mol. Cell Proteomics6, 382–393 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholten A, van Veen TA, Vos MA et al. Diversity of cAMP-dependent protein kinase isoforms and their anchoring proteins in mouse ventricular tissue. J. Proteome Res.6, 1705–1717 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Fraldi A, Zito E, Annunziata F et al. Multistep, sequential control of the trafficking and function of the multiple sulfatase deficiency gene product, SUMF1 by PDI, ERGIC-53 and ERp44. Hum. Mol. Genet.17, 2610–2621 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pisa V, Cozzolino M, Gargiulo S et al. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is a component of the cap-binding complex and interacts with the translational repressor Cup during Drosophila oogenesis. Gene432, 67–74 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bowen C, Stuart A, Ju JH et al. NKX3.1 homeodomain protein binds to topoisomerase I and enhances its activity. Cancer Res.67, 455–464 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köcher T, Superti-Furga G. Mass spectrometry–based functional proteomics: from molecular machines to protein networks. Nat. Methods4, 807–815 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee PY, Bae KH, Kho CW et al. Interactome analysis of yeast glutathione peroxidase 3. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.18, 1364–1367 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature440, 631–636 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature440, 637–643 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks E, Nabieva E, Chazelle B et al. Organization of physical interactomes as uncovered by network schemas. PLoS Comput. Biol.4, e1000203 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Park BH, Karpinets T et al. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance. Bioinformatics24, 979–986 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Klein T, P Geurink P, S Overkleeft H, et al. Functional proteomics on zinc-dependent metalloproteinases using inhibitor probes. ChemMedChem.4, 164–170 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rix U, Hantschel O, Dürnberger G et al. Chemical proteomic profiles of the BCR-ABL inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib reveal novel kinase and nonkinase targets. Blood110, 4055–4063 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remsing Rix LL, Rix U, Colinge J et al. Global target profile of the kinase inhibitor bosutinib in primary chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia DOI: 10.1038 (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Aye TT, Mohammed S, Toorn HW et al. Selectivity in enrichment of PKA RI and RII isoforms and their interactors using modified cAMP affinity resins. Mol. Cell Proteomics. (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson RJ. Alternative mechanisms of initiating translation of mammalian mRNAs. Biochem. Soc. Trans.33, 1231–1241 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasko P. The Drosophila melanogaster genome: translation factors and RNA binding proteins. J. Cell Biol.150, 51–56 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak M. Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene234, 187–208 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Cirulli C, Amoresano A et al.Cis-acting sequences and trans-acting factors in the localization of mRNA for mitochondrial ribosomal proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta.1779, 820–829 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lin JY, Li ML, Huang PN et al. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein K interacts with the enterovirus 71 5´ untranslated region and participates in virus replication. J. Gen. Virol.89, 2540–2549 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medugno L, Costanzo P, Lupo A et al. A novel zinc finger transcriptional repressor, ZNF224, interacts with the negative regulatory element (AldA-NRE) and inhibits gene expression. FEBS Lett.534, 93–100 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Pogar T, Liang S, Hague LK et al. Specific trans-acting proteins interact with auxiliary RNA polyadenylation elements in the COX-2 3´-UTR. RNA13, 1103–1115 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert JP, Mitchell L, Rudner A et al. A novel proteomic approach for the discovery of chromatin associated protein networks. Mol. Cell Proteomics (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature422, 198–207 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti M, Orrù S, Pagnozzi D et al. Functional proteomics. Clin. Chim. Acta357, 140–150 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti M, Orrù S, Pagnozzi D et al. Interaction proteomics. Biosci Rep.25, 45–56 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin AC, Bösche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature415, 141–147 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature415, 180–183 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goll J, Uetz P. The elusive yeast interactome. Genome Biol.7, 223 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcellier A, Schmitt E, Gurbuxani S et al. hsp27 is a ubiquitin-binding protein involved in I-κBα proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell Biol.23, 5790–5802 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyer P, Trembley JH, Grenet JA et al. Characterization of cyclin L1 and L2 interactions with CDK11 and splicing factors. J. Biol. Chem.283, 7721–7732 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Yang WC, Gao Q et al. Toward chromatographic analysis of interacting protein networks. J. Chromatogr. A1178, 24–32 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Tanese N. Small-scale density gradient sedimentation to separate and analyze multiprotein complexes. Methods12, 224–234 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogelmann R, Nelson WJ. Fractionation of the epithelial apical junctional complex: reassessment of protein distributions in different substructures. Mol. Biol. Cell16, 701–716 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dörr J, Kartarius S, Götz C et al. Contribution of the individual subunits of protein kinase CK2 and of hPrp3p to the splicing process. Mol. Cell Biochem.316, 187–193 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Schägger H, von Jagow G. Blue native electrophoresis for isolation of membrane protein complexes in enzymatically active form. Anal. Biochem.199, 223–231 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho-Carvajal MM, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R et al. Two-dimensional blue native/SDS gel electrophoresis of multi-protein complexes from whole cellular lysates: a proteomics approach. Mol. Cell Proteomics3, 176–182 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krause F. Detection and analysis of protein-protein interactions in organellar and prokaryotic proteomes by native gel electrophoresis: (membrane) protein complexes and supercomplexes. Electrophoresis27, 2759–2781 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Selbach M, Mann M. Protein interaction screening by quantitative immunoprecipitation combined with knockdown (QUICK). Nat. Methods3, 981–983 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle JD. Purification of organelles from mammalian cells. Curr. Protoc. Immunol.8, 8.1B (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Chang J, Ruiz V, Vancura A. Purification of yeast membranes and organelles by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Methods Mol. Biol.457, 141–149 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilhelm JE, Hilton M, Amos Q et al. Cup is an eIF4E binding protein required for both the translational repression of oskar and the recruitment of Barentsz. J. Cell Biol.163, 1197–1204 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura A, Sato K, Hanyu-Nakamura K. Drosophila cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Dev. Cell6, 69–78 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clouse KN, Ferguson SB, Schupbach T. Squid, Cup, and PABP55B function together to regulate gurken translation in Drosophila. Dev. Biol.313, 713–724 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Richter JD, Sonenberg N. Regulation of cap-dependent translation by eIF4E inhibitory proteins. Nature433, 477–480 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holaska JM, Wilson KL. An emerin “proteome”: purification of distinct emerin-containing complexes from HeLa cells suggests molecular basis for diverse roles including gene regulation, mRNA splicing, signaling, mechanosensing, and nuclear architecture. Biochemistry46, 8897–8908 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar