Strategies for quantitation of phosphoproteomic data

References

• Graves JD, Krebs EG. Protein phosphorylation and signal transduction. Pharmacol. Ther.82(2–3), 111–121 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter T. Signaling – 2000 and beyond. Cell100(1), 113–127 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagoev B, Ong SE, Kratchmarova I, Mann M. Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.22(9), 1139–1145 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengjel J, Akimov V, Olsen JV et al. Quantitative proteomic assessment of very early cellular signaling events. Nat. Biotechnol.25(5), 566–568 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersema PJ, Mohammed S, Heck AJ. Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom.44(6), 861–878 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafken PR. An overview of the qualitative analysis of phosphoproteins by mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol.527, 159–172 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang PH, White FM. Phosphoproteomics: unraveling the signaling web. Mol. Cell31(6), 777–781 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piggee C. Phosphoproteomics: miles to go before it’s routine. Anal. Chem.81(7), 2418–2420 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics. Proteomics9(6), 1451–1468 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MO, Yu L, Choudhary JS. Analysis of protein phosphorylation on a proteome-scale. Proteomics7(16), 2751–2768 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronborg M, Kristiansen TZ, Stensballe A et al. A mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach for identification of serine/threonine-phosphorylated proteins by enrichment with phospho-specific antibodies: identification of a novel protein, Frigg, as a protein kinase A substrate. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(7), 517–527 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Fernandez MM, Steen H et al. Identification of a novel immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-containing molecule, STAM2, by mass spectrometry and its involvement in growth factor and cytokine receptor signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem.275(49), 38633–38639 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA et al. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol.23(1), 94–101 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasyapa C, Gu TL, Nagarajan L, Polakiewicz R, Cowell JK. Phosphorylation of the SSBP2 and ABL proteins by the ZNF198–FGFR1 fusion kinase seen in atypical myeloproliferative disorders as revealed by phosphopeptide-specific MS. Proteomics9(16), 3979–3988 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yoshida Y, Nameta M et al. Glomerular proteins related to slit diaphragm and matrix adhesion in the foot processes are highly tyrosine phosphorylated in the normal rat kidney. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfp697 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Shomori K, Ochiai A, Akimoto S et al. Tyrosine-phosphorylation of the 12th armadillo-repeat of β-catenin is associated with cadherin dysfunction in human cancer. Int. J. Oncol.35(3), 517–524 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duran MC, Chan HL, Timms JF. Identification of oxidative stress-induced tyrosine phosphorylated proteins by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol.t527, 33–45 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom Lind S, Molin M, Savitski MM et al. Immunoaffinity enrichments followed by mass spectrometric detection for studying global protein tyrosine phosphorylation. J. Proteome Res.7(7), 2897–2910 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(5), 1488–1493 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson L, Porath J. Isolation of phosphoproteins by immobilized metal (Fe3+) affinity chromatography. Anal. Biochem.154(1), 250–254 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaga G, Hopp J, Nelson P. Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography on Co2+-carboxymethylaspartate-agarose superflow, as demonstrated by one-step purification of lactate dehydrogenase from chicken breast muscle. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.29, 19–24 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochuli E, Dobeli H, Schacher A. New metal chelate adsorbent selective for proteins and peptides containing neighbouring histidine residues. J. Chromatogr.411, 177–184 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville DC, Rozanas CR, Price EM, Gruis DB, Verkman AS, Townsend RR. Evidence for phosphorylation of serine 753 in CFTR using a novel metal-ion affinity resin and matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry. Protein Sci.6(11), 2436–2445 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath J, Carlsson J, Olsson I, Belfrage G. Metal chelate affinity chromatography, a new approach to protein fractionation. Nature258(5536), 598–599 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol.20(3), 301–305 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jorgensen TJ. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(7), 873–886 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jorgensen TJ, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides using titanium dioxide. Nat. Protoc.1(4), 1929–1935 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkse MW, Uitto PM, Hilhorst MJ, Ooms B, Heck AJ. Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Anal. Chem.76(14), 3935–3943 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen SS, Larsen MR. Evaluation of the impact of some experimental procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.21(22), 3635–3645 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolschin F, Wienkoop S, Weckwerth W. Enrichment of phosphorylated proteins and peptides from complex mixtures using metal oxide/hydroxide affinity chromatography (MOAC). Proteomics5(17), 4389–4397 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccurullo M, Schlosser G, Cacace G, Malorni L, Pocsfalvi G. Identification of phosphoproteins and determination of phosphorylation sites by zirconium dioxide enrichment and SELDI-MS/MS. J. Mass Spectrom.42(8), 1069–1078 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera JG, Choi YS, Vujcic S, Wood TD, Colon LA. Enrichment/isolation of phosphorylated peptides on hafnium oxide prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Analyst134(1), 31–33 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou H, Tian R, Ye M et al. Highly specific enrichment of phosphopeptides by zirconium dioxide nanoparticles for phosphoproteome analysis. Electrophoresis28(13), 2201–2215 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kweon HK, Hakansson K. Selective zirconium dioxide-based enrichment of phosphorylated peptides for mass spectrometric analysis. Anal. Chem.78(6), 1743–1749 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR. SIMAC – a phosphoproteomic strategy for the rapid separation of mono-phosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7, 661–671 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrascal M, Ovelleiro D, Casas V, Gay M, Abian J. Phosphorylation analysis of primary human T lymphocytes using sequential IMAC and titanium oxide enrichment. J. Proteome Res.7(12), 5167–5176 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rewitz KF, Larsen MR, Lobner-Olesen A, Rybczynski R, O’Connor MB, Gilbert LI. A phosphoproteomics approach to elucidate neuropeptide signal transduction controlling insect metamorphosis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.39(7), 475–483 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds EC, Riley PF, Adamson NJ. A selective precipitation purification procedure for multiple phosphoseryl-containing peptides and methods for their identification. Anal. Biochem.217(2), 277–284 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Ye J, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P. Highly efficient phosphopeptide enrichment by calcium phosphate precipitation combined with subsequent IMAC enrichment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(11), 2032–2042 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oda Y, Nagasu T, Chait BT. Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol.19(4), 379–382 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlin DT, Chait BT. Improved β-elimination-based affinity purification strategy for enrichment of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem.75(24), 6826–6836 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Watts JD, Aebersold R. A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Biotechnol.19(4), 375–378 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao WA, Wollscheid B, O’Brien R et al. Quantitative phosphoproteome analysis using a dendrimer conjugation chemistry and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods2(8), 591–598 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Pedrioli PG et al. An integrated chemical, mass spectrometric and computational strategy for (quantitative) phosphoproteomics: application to Drosophila melanogaster Kc167 cells. Mol. Biosyst.3(4), 275–286 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpert AJ. Electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography for isocratic separation of charged solutes and selective isolation of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem.80(1), 62–76 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Guo T, Li X et al. Simultaneous characterization of glyco- and phospho-proteomes of mouse brain membrane proteome with electrostatic repulsion hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC). Mol. Cell. Proteomics DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M900314-MCP200 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Nuhse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Large-scale analysis of in vivo phosphorylated membrane proteins by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics2(11), 1234–1243 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty DE, Annan RS. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7, 971–980 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(33), 12130–12135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(3), 310–327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda Y, Huang K, Cross FR, Cowburn D, Chait BT. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96(12), 6591–6596 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(5), 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Pan S, Gu S, Bradbury EM, Chen X. Amino acid residue specific stable isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.16(22), 2115–2123 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarrola N, Kalume DE, Gronborg M, Iwahori A, Pandey A. A proteomic approach for quantitation of phosphorylation using stable isotope labeling in cell culture. Anal. Chem.75(22), 6043–6049 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanchy R, Kalume DE, Iwahori A, Zhong J, Pandey A. Phosphoproteome analysis of HeLa cells using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). J. Proteome Res.4(5), 1661–1671 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss VL, Lee KA, Moritz A et al. A common phosphotyrosine signature for the Bcr–Abl kinase. Blood107(12), 4888–4897 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose R, Molina H, Patterson AS et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of Her2/neu signaling and inhibition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(26), 9773–9778 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratchmarova I, Blagoev B, Haack-Sorensen M, Kassem M, Mann M. Mechanism of divergent growth factor effects in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science308(5727), 1472–1477 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell127(3), 635–648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik R, Lenobel R, Santamaria A, Ries A, Nigg EA, Korner R. Quantitative analysis of the human spindle phosphoproteome at distinct mitotic stages. J. Proteome Res.8(10), 4553–4563 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilger M, Bonaldi T, Gnad F, Mann M. Systems-wide analysis of a phosphatase knock-down by quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(8), 1908–1920 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Matthews DE, Yates JR 3rd. Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Anal. Chem.76(17), 4951–4959 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijgsveld J, Ketting RF, Mahmoudi T et al. Metabolic labeling of C. elegans and D. melanogaster for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.21(8), 927–931 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger M, Moser M, Ussar S et al. SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function. Cell134(2), 353–364 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi EC, Li XJ, Cooke K et al. Increased quantitative proteome coverage with 13C/12C-based, acid-cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag reagent and modified data acquisition scheme. Proteomics5(2), 380–387 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelemann A, Petti F, Griffin G et al. Phosphotyrosine signaling networks in epidermal growth factor receptor overexpressing squamous carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(4), 356–376 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachon E, Mohammed S, Bache N, Jensen ON. Phosphopeptide quantitation using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents and tandem mass spectrometry: application to proteins isolated by gel electrophoresis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.20(7), 1127–1134 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munton RP, Tweedie-Cullen R, Livingstone-Zatchej M et al. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of protein phosphorylation in naive and stimulated mouse synaptosomal preparations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(2), 283–293 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmelzle K, Kane S, Gridley S, Lienhard GE, White FM. Temporal dynamics of tyrosine phosphorylation in insulin signaling. Diabetes55(8), 2171–2179 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wolf-Yadlin A, Ross PL et al. Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(9), 1240–1250 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Yadlin A, Hautaniemi S, Lauffenburger DA, White FM. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(14), 5860–5865 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosemeci A, Jaffe H. Regulation of phosphorylation at the postsynaptic density during different activity states of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.391(1), 78–84 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen YX, Li Y, Wang WM et al. Phosphoproteomic study of human tubular epithelial cell in response to transforming growth factor-β-1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Am. J. Nephrol.31(1), 24–35 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choe L, D’Ascenzo M, Relkin NR et al. 8-plex quantitation of changes in cerebrospinal fluid protein expression in subjects undergoing intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Proteomics7(20), 3651–3660 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A, Schafer J, Kuhn K et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem.75(8), 1895–1904 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viner RI, Zhang T, Second T, Zabrouskov V. Quantification of post-translationally modified peptides of bovine a-crystallin using tandem mass tags and electron transfer dissociation. J. Proteomics72(5), 874–885 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz JC, Syka JEP, Quarmby ST. Proceedings of the 53rd ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics. San Antonio, TX, USA, 5–9 June 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Boesche M, Eberhard D, Matthieson T, Sweetman G, Kuster B. Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(9), 1702–1713 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Wu S, Stenoien DL et al. Combined pulsed-Q dissociation and electron transfer dissociation for identification and quantification of iTRAQ-labeled phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem.81(10), 4137–4143 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Palmisano G, Kjeldsen F, Larsen MR. Undesirable charge-enhancement of isobaric tagged phosphopeptides leads to reduced identification efficiency. J. Proteome Res. DOI: 10.1021/pr100230q (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirgorodskaya OA, Kozmin YP, Titov MI, Korner R, Sonksen CP, Roepstorff P. Quantitation of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using 18O-labeled internal standards. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.14(14), 1226–1232 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart II, Thomson T, Figeys D. 18O labeling: a tool for proteomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.15(24), 2456–2465 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao X, Freas A, Ramirez J, Demirev PA, Fenselau C. Proteolytic 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem.73(13), 2836–2842 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlett DR, Keller A, Watts JD et al. Differential stable isotope labeling of peptides for quantitation and de novo sequence derivation. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.15(14), 1214–1221 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JC, Duchesne MA, Tozzi P, Ethier M, Figeys D. A differential phosphoproteomic analysis of retinoic acid-treated P19 cells. J. Proteome Res.6(8), 3174–3186 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu JL, Huang SY, Chow NH, Chen SH. Stable-isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem.75(24), 6843–6852 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SY, Tsai ML, Wu CJ, Hsu JL, Ho SH, Chen SH. Quantitation of protein phosphorylation in pregnant rat uteri using stable isotope dimethyl labeling coupled with IMAC. Proteomics6(6), 1722–1734 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boersema PJ, Aye TT, van Veen TA, Heck AJ, Mohammed S. Triplex protein quantification based on stable isotope labeling by peptide dimethylation applied to cell and tissue lysates. Proteomics8(22), 4624–4632 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boersema PJ, Foong LY, Ding VM et al. In depth qualitative and quantitative profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation using a combination of phosphopeptide immuno-affinity purification and stable isotope dimethyl labeling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics9, 84–99 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.389(4), 1017–1031 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiesen R. Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: a practical point of view. Proteomics7(16), 2815–2832 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu H, Sadygov RG, Yates JR 3rd. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem.76(14), 4193–4201 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren DH, Hwang SI, Wu L, Han DK. Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics7(1), 39–53 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CJ, Cai T, Rikova K, Merberg D, Kasif S, Steffen M. A predictive phosphorylation signature of lung cancer. PLoS ONE4(11), e7994 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Heibeck TH, Ding SJ, Opresko LK et al. An extensive survey of tyrosine phosphorylation revealing new sites in human mammary epithelial cells. J. Proteome Res.8(8), 3852–3861 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen H, Jebanathirajah JA, Springer M, Kirschner MW. Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(11), 3948–3953 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulemeijer IJ, Joosten MH, Jensen ON. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of tomato mounting a hypersensitive response reveals a swift suppression of photosynthetic activity and a differential role for hsp90 isoforms. J. Proteome Res.8(3), 1168–1182 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu JL, Wang LY, Wang SY et al. Functional phosphoproteomic profiling of phosphorylation sites in membrane fractions of salt-stressed Arabidopsis thaliana. Proteome Sci.7, 42 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen V, Cao L, Lin JT et al. A new approach for quantitative phosphoproteomic dissection of signaling pathways applied to T cell receptor activation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(11), 2418–2431 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffert JD, Pisitkun T, Wang G, Shen RF, Knepper MA. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of vasopressin-sensitive renal cells: regulation of aquaporin-2 phosphorylation at two sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(18), 7159–7164 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listgarten J, Emili A. Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(4), 419–434 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• America AH, Cordewener JH, van Geffen MH et al. Alignment and statistical difference analysis of complex peptide data sets generated by multidimensional LC-MS. Proteomics6(2), 641–653 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister SJ, Barry RC, Adkins JN et al. Normalization approaches for removing systematic biases associated with mass spectrometry and label-free proteomics. J. Proteome Res.5(2), 277–286 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin NM, Yu J, Long F et al. Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomic analysis. Nat. Biotechnol.28(1), 83–89 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Rinner O, Schmidt A et al. SuperHirn – a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling. Proteomics7(19), 3470–3480 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M, Domon B, Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods4(3), 231–237 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiland S, Messerli G, Baerenfaller K et al. Large-scale Arabidopsis phosphoproteome profiling reveals novel chloroplast kinase substrates and phosphorylation networks. Plant Physiol.150(2), 889–903 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusniak MY, Bodenmiller B, Campbell D et al. Corra: computational framework and tools for LC-MS discovery and targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics9, 542 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCormick DJ, Holmes MW, Muddiman DC, Madden BJ. Mapping sites of protein phosphorylation by mass spectrometry utilizing a chemical-enzymatic approach: characterization of products from a-S1 casein phosphopeptides. J. Proteome Res.4(2), 424–434 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson KL, Whetton AD, Dive C. Quantitative mass spectrometry-based techniques for clinical use: biomarker identification and quantification. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.877(13), 1240–1249 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller ML, Ponten TS, Petersen TN, Blom N. NetPhosK – prediction of kinase-specific phosphorylation from sequence and sequence-derived features. FEBS J. – FEBS 2005 Congress272(s1), A3–030P (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Du X, Yang F, Manes NP et al. Linear discriminant analysis-based estimation of the false discovery rate for phosphopeptide identifications. J. Proteome Res.7(6), 2195–2203 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang HD, Lee TY, Tzeng SW, Horng JT. KinasePhos: a web tool for identifying protein kinase-specific phosphorylation sites. Nucleic Acids Res.33(Web Server issue), W226–W229 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong YH, Lee TY, Liang HK et al. KinasePhos 2.0: a web server for identifying protein kinase-specific phosphorylation sites based on sequences and coupling patterns. Nucleic Acids Res.35(Web Server issue), W588–W594 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res.31(13), 3635–3641 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruttenberg BE, Pisitkun T, Knepper MA, Hoffert JD. PhosphoScore: an open-source phosphorylation site assignment tool for MSn data. J. Proteome Res.7(7), 3054–3059 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Y, Cripps D, Thomas S et al. PhosphoScan: a probability-based method for phosphorylation site prediction using MS2/MS3 pair information. J. Proteome Res.7(7), 2803–2811 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne SH, Yau M, Smolka MB, Tanner S, Zhou H, Bafna V. Phosphorylation-specific MS/MS scoring for rapid and accurate phosphoproteome analysis. J. Proteome Res.7(8), 3373–3381 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnad F, Ren S, Cox J et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol.8(11), R250 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulintz PJ, Bodenmiller B, Andrews PC, Aebersold R, Nesvizhskii AI. Investigating MS2/MS3 matching statistics: a model for coupling consecutive stage mass spectrometry data for increased peptide identification confidence. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(1), 71–87 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Ruse CI, Yates JR 3rd. Colander: a probability-based support vector machine algorithm for automatic screening for CID spectra of phosphopeptides prior to database search. J. Proteome Res.7(8), 3628–3634 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Malmstrom J, Gerrits B et al. PhosphoPep – a phosphoproteome resource for systems biology research in Drosophila Kc167 cells. Mol. Syst. Biol.3, 139 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol.24(10), 1285–1292 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom N, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S. Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol.294(5), 1351–1362 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4(3), 207–214 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii AI, Vitek O, Aebersold R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4(10), 787–797 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner PA, Dancik V, Tang CL. Mutation-tolerant protein identification by mass spectrometry. J. Comput. Biol.7(6), 777–787 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pevzner PA, Mulyukov Z, Dancik V, Tang CL. Efficiency of database search for identification of mutated and modified proteins via mass spectrometry. Genome Res.11(2), 290–299 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han Y, Ma B, Zhang K. SPIDER: software for protein identification from sequence tags with de novo sequencing error. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol.3(3), 697–716 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsur D, Tanner S, Zandi E, Bafna V, Pevzner PA. Identification of post-translational modifications by blind search of mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol.23(12), 1562–1567 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter L, Claassen M, Schrimpf SP et al. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(11), 2405–2417 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kall L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 29–34 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem.74(20), 5383–5392 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(37), 13417–13422 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen P, Gouw JW, Olsen JV et al. MSQuant, an open source platform for mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res.9(1), 393–403 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol.26(12), 1367–1372 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macek B, Mijakovic I, Olsen JV et al. The serine/threonine/tyrosine phosphoproteome of the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(4), 697–707 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadysirisack DD, Chen ES, Zhang Z, Tsai MD, Chang GD, Jhiang SM. Identification of in vivo phosphorylation sites and their functional significance in the sodium iodide symporter. J. Biol. Chem.282(51), 36820–36828 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daub H, Olsen JV, Bairlein M et al. Kinase-selective enrichment enables quantitative phosphoproteomics of the kinome across the cell cycle. Mol. Cell31(3), 438–448 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Godoy LM, Olsen JV, Cox J et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature455(7217), 1251–1254 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou J, Cui Z, Xie Z et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of rat L6 myotubes using reversed-phase C18 prefractionation and titanium dioxide enrichment. J. Proteome Res.9(2), 777–788 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dephoure N, Zhou C, Villen J et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(31), 10762–10767 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD et al. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of a-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res.6(3), 1190–1197 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffert JD, Wang G, Pisitkun T, Shen RF, Knepper MA. An automated platform for analysis of phosphoproteomic data sets: application to kidney collecting duct phosphoproteins. J. Proteome Res.6(9), 3501–3508 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Ruse C, Xu T, Park SK, Yates J 3rd. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem.79(4), 1301–1310 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey CM, Sweet SM, Cunningham DL, Zeller M, Heath JK, Cooper HJ. SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J. Proteome Res.8(4), 1965–1971 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau KW, Jones AR, Swainston N, Siepen JA, Hubbard SJ. Capture and analysis of quantitative proteomic data. Proteomics7(16), 2787–2799 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 51–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulla K, Daub H, Hornberger R, Nigg EA, Korner R. Quantitative site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of human protein kinases during mitotic progression. Mol. Cell. Proteomics DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M900335-MCP200 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal3(104), ra3 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SK, Venable JD, Xu T, Yates JR 3rd. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods5(4), 319–322 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, McClatchy DB, Park SK, Xu T, Lu B, Yates JR 3rd. Quantitative analysis of brain nuclear phosphoproteins identifies developmentally regulated phosphorylation events. J. Proteome Res.7(11), 4743–4755 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Breukelen B, van den Toorn HW, Drugan MM, Heck AJ. StatQuant: a post-quantification analysis toolbox for improving quantitative mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics25(11), 1472–1473 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boja ES, Phillips D, French SA, Harris RA, Balaban RS. Quantitative mitochondrial phosphoproteomics using iTRAQ on an LTQ-Orbitrap with high energy collision dissociation. J. Proteome Res.8(10), 4665–4675 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CY, Tsui YH, Yian YH, Sung TY, Hsu WL. The Multi-Q web server for multiplexed protein quantitation. Nucleic Acids Res.35(Web Server issue), W707–W712 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Gucek M, Hart GW. Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O-GlcNAc. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(37), 13793–13798 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou F, Galan J, Geahlen RL, Tao WA. A novel quantitative proteomics strategy to study phosphorylation-dependent peptide–protein interactions. J. Proteome Res.6(1), 133–140 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuhse TS, Bottrill AR, Jones AME, Peck SC. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins reveals regulatory mechanisms of plant innate immune responses. Plant J.51, 931–940 (2007)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar