Challenges in plasma membrane phosphoproteomics

References

• Macek B, Mann M, Olsen JV. Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.49, 199–221 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding SJ, Qian WJ, Smith RD. Quantitative proteomic approaches for studying phosphotyrosine signaling. Expert Rev. Proteomics4(1), 13–23 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume-Jensen P, Hunter T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature411(6835), 355–365 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics. Proteomics9(6), 1451–1468 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(33), 12130–12135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill LM, Salomon AR, Ficarro SB, Mukherji M, Stettler-Gill M, Peters EC. Robust phosphoproteomic profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation sites from human T cells using immobilized metal affinity chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.76(10), 2763–2772 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD et al. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of α-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res.6(3), 1190–1197 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old WM, Shabb JB, Houel S et al. Functional proteomics identifies targets of phosphorylation by B-Raf signaling in melanoma. Mol. Cell34(1), 115–131 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell127(3), 635–648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal.3(104), ra3 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CC, Yates JR 3rd. The application of mass spectrometry to membrane proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.21(3), 262–267 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeagle P. The Membranes of Cells. Academic Press, Buffalo, NY, USA (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Jain M. Introduction to Biological Membranes. John Wiley and Sons, NY, USA (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Navarre C, Degand H, Bennett KL, Crawford JS, Mortz E, Boutry M. Subproteomics: identification of plasma membrane proteins from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics2(12), 1706–1714 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquali C, Fialka I, Huber LA. Subcellular fractionation, electromigration analysis and mapping of organelles. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl.722(1–2), 89–102 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Xie J, Wang X et al. Proteomic analysis of mouse liver plasma membrane: use of differential extraction to enrich hydrophobic membrane proteins. Proteomics5(17), 4510–4524 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski JR. Tools for phospho- and glycoproteomics of plasma membranes. Amino Acids DOI: 10.1007/s00726-010-0796-0798 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Staubach S, Hanisch FG. Lipid rafts: signaling and sorting platforms of cells and their roles in cancer. Expert Rev. Proteomics8(2), 263–277 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster LJ, De Hoog CL, Mann M. Unbiased quantitative proteomics of lipid rafts reveals high specificity for signaling factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(10), 5813–5818 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Nielsen PA, Andersen JR, Mann M, Wisniewski JR. Quantitative proteomic profiling of membrane proteins from the mouse brain cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum using the HysTag reagent: mapping of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels. Brain Res.1134(1), 95–106 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen AJ, Lilley KS. Proteomics of total membranes and subcellular membranes. Expert Rev. Proteomics7(6), 867–878 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang VM, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD et al. Quantitative proteomics employing primary amine affinity tags. J. Biomol. Tech.14(3), 216–223 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Peirce MJ, Cope AP, Wait R. Proteomic analysis of the lymphocyte plasma membrane using cell surface biotinylation and solution-phase isoelectric focusing. Methods Mol. Biol.528, 135–140 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elschenbroich S, Kim Y, Medin JA, Kislinger T. Isolation of cell surface proteins for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics7(1), 141–154 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh D, Krokhin O, Antonovici M et al. Lectin affinity as an approach to the proteomic analysis of membrane glycoproteins. J. Proteome Res.3(4), 841–850 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercoutter-Edouart AS, Slomianny MC, Dekeyzer-Beseme O, Haeuw JF, Michalski JC. Glycoproteomics and glycomics investigation of membrane N-glycosylproteins from human colon carcinoma cells. Proteomics8(16), 3236–3256 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald CA, Yang JY, Marathe V, Yen TY, Macher BA. Combining results from lectin affinity chromatography and glycocapture approaches substantially improves the coverage of the glycoproteome. Mol. Cell Proteomics8(2), 287–301 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Everberg H, Leiding T, Schioth A, Tjerneld F, Gustavsson N. Efficient and non-denaturing membrane solubilization combined with enrichment of membrane protein complexes by detergent/polymer aqueous two-phase partitioning for proteome analysis. J. Chromatogr.1122(1–2), 35–46 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jones MN. Surfactants in membrane solubilisation. Int. J. Pharmaceut.177(2), 137–159 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Mann M. Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. J. Proteome Res.8(12), 5674–5678 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods6(5), 359–362 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu YQ, Gilar M, Gebler JC. A complete peptide mapping of membrane proteins: a novel surfactant aiding the enzymatic digestion of bacteriorhodopsin. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.18(6), 711–715 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Powell MJ, Razunguzwa TT, O’Doherty GA. A general approach to anionic acid-labile surfactants with tunable properties. J. Org. Chem.75(18), 6149–6153 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder J, Conrads TP, Yu LR et al. A detergent- and cyanogen bromide-free method for integral membrane proteomics: application to Halobacterium purple membranes and the human epidermal membrane proteome. Proteomics4(1), 31–45 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macher BA, Yen TY. Proteins at membrane surfaces-a review of approaches. Mol. Biosyst.3(10), 705–713 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amici GM, Huber CG, Zolla L. Separation of thylakoid membrane proteins by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation or blue native-SDS-PAGE two-dimensional electrophoresis. Methods Mol. Biol.528, 61–70 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen DN, Becker GW, Riggin RM. Protein mass spectrometry: applications to analytical biotechnology. J. Chromatogr.705(1), 21–45 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauci S, Helbig AO, Slijper M, Krijgsveld J, Heck AJ, Mohammed S. Lys-N and trypsin cover complementary parts of the phosphoproteome in a refined SCX-based approach. Anal. Chem.81(11), 4493–4501 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Montfort BA, Doeven MK, Canas B, Veenhoff LM, Poolman B, Robillard GT. Combined in-gel tryptic digestion and CNBr cleavage for the generation of peptide maps of an integral membrane protein with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1555(1–3), 111–115 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol.19(3), 242–247 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramanik BN, Mirza UA, Ing YH et al. Microwave-enhanced enzyme reaction for protein mapping by mass spectrometry: a new approach to protein digestion in minutes. Protein Sci.11(11), 2676–2687 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong H, Marcus SL, Li L. Microwave-assisted acid hydrolysis of proteins combined with liquid chromatography MALDI MS/MS for protein identification. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spec.16(4), 471–481 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WY, Chen YC. Functional Fe3O4@ZnO magnetic nanoparticle-assisted enrichment and enzymatic digestion of phosphoproteins from saliva. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.398(5), 2049–2057 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan N, Wu HF, Li YH, Nawaz M. Two-step on-particle ionization/enrichment via a washing- and separation-free approach: multifunctional TiO2 nanoparticles as desalting, accelerating, and affinity probes for microwave-assisted tryptic digestion of phosphoproteins in ESI-MS and MALDI-MS: comparison with microscale TiO2. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.396(8), 2909–2919 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers LD, Foster LJ. Phosphoproteomics – finally fulfilling the promise? Mol. Biosyst.5(10), 1122–1129 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Demus H. Subcellular fractionation of human lymphocytes. Isolation of two plasma membrane fractions and comparison of the protein components of the various lymphocytic organelles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta291(1), 93–106 (1973).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villen J, Gygi SP. The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protocols3(10), 1630–1638 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puente LG, Megeney LA. Isolation of phosphoproteins. Methods Mol. Biol.424, 365–372 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher JA, Crockett DK, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Lim MS. Evaluation of enrichment techniques for mass spectrometry: identification of tyrosine phosphoproteins in cancer cells. J. Mol. Diagn.9(2), 169–177 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA et al. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol.23(1), 94–101 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano K, Shinkawa T, Yabuki N et al. Integration of proteomic analyses to monitor the activity status of phosphorylation signaling. J. Proteomics74(3), 319–326 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Hu P, Quinn DF, Wang YK. Phosphotyrosine proteomic study of interferon alpha signaling pathway using a combination of immunoprecipitation and immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Mol. Cell Proteomics4(6), 721–730 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper JA, Sefton BM, Hunter T. Detection and quantification of phosphotyrosine in proteins. Methods Enzymol.99, 387–402 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronborg M, Kristiansen TZ, Stensballe A et al. A mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach for identification of serine/threonine-phosphorylated proteins by enrichment with phospho-specific antibodies: identification of a novel protein, Frigg, as a protein kinase A substrate. Mol. Cell Proteomics1(7), 517–527 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski JR, Nagaraj N, Zougman A, Gnad F, Mann M. Brain phosphoproteome obtained by a FASP-based method reveals plasma membrane protein topology. J. Proteome Res.9(6), 3280–3289 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballif BA, Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Schwartz D, Gygi SP. Phosphoproteomic analysis of the developing mouse brain. Mol. Cell Proteomics3(11), 1093–1101 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dephoure N, Zhou C, Villen J et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(31), 10762–10767 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(5), 1488–1493 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morandell S, Stasyk T, Grosstessner-Hain K et al. Phosphoproteomics strategies for the functional analysis of signal transduction. Proteomics6(14), 4047–4056 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuhse TS, Peck SC. Peptide-based phosphoproteomics with immobilized metal ion chromatography. Methods Mol. Biol.323, 431–436 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nuhse TS, Bottrill AR, Jones AM, Peck SC. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins reveals regulatory mechanisms of plant innate immune responses. Plant J.51(5), 931–940 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuhse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Phosphoproteomics of the Arabidopsis plasma membrane and a new phosphorylation site database. Plant Cell16(9), 2394–2405 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenau J, Michelland S, Sidibe J, Seve M. Peptides OFFGEL electrophoresis: a suitable pre-analytical step for complex eukaryotic samples fractionation compatible with quantitative iTRAQ labeling. Proteome Sci.6, 9 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horth P, Miller CA, Preckel T, Wenz C. Efficient fractionation and improved protein identification by peptide OFFGEL electrophoresis. Mol. Cell Proteomics5(10), 1968–1974 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauci S, van Breukelen B, Lemeer SM, Krijgsveld J, Heck AJ. A versatile peptide pI calculator for phosphorylated and N-terminal acetylated peptides experimentally tested using peptide isoelectric focusing. Proteomics8(23–24), 4898–4906 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Maccarrone G, Kolb N, Teplytska L et al. Phosphopeptide enrichment by IEF. Electrophoresis27(22), 4585–4595 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Xu CF, Wang H, Li D, Kong XP, Neubert TA. Selective enrichment and fractionation of phosphopeptides from peptide mixtures by isoelectric focusing after methyl esterification. Anal. Chem.79(5), 2007–2014 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hung CW, Kubler D, Lehmann WD. pI-based phosphopeptide enrichment combined with nanoESI-MS. Electrophoresis28(12), 2044–2052 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Sprung R, Kwon SW, Kim SC, Zhao Y. Isolation of phosphopeptides by pI-difference-based electrophoresis. J. Proteome Res.6(3), 1153–1157 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Zuo X, Lee K-B, Speicher DW. Fractionation of Complex Proteomes by Microscale Solution Isoelectrofocusing Using ZOOM− IEF Fractionators to Improve Protein Profiling. In: The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Walker JM (Ed.). Humana Press, NJ, USA, 97–117 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• McNulty DE, Annan RS. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography for fractionation and enrichment of the phosphoproteome. Methods Mol. Biol.527, 93–105 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNulty DE, Annan RS. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol. Cell Proteomics7(5), 971–980 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics7(7), 1389–1396 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol.20(3), 301–305 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarro SB, Salomon AR, Brill LM et al. Automated immobilized metal affinity chromatography/nano-liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry platform for profiling protein phosphorylation sites. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.19(1), 57–71 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MO, Yu L, Coba MP et al. Proteomic analysis of in vivo phosphorylated synaptic proteins. J. Biol. Chem.280(7), 5972–5982 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath J. Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. Protein Exp. Purification3(4), 263–281 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubu M, Ishihama Y, Sato T, Nagasu T, Oda Y. Specificity of immobilized metal affinity-based IMAC/C18 tip enrichment of phosphopeptides for protein phosphorylation analysis. Anal. Chem.77(16), 5144–5154 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkse MW, Uitto PM, Hilhorst MJ, Ooms B, Heck AJ. Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC–ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Anal. Chem.76(14), 3935–3943 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jorgensen TJ. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell Proteomics4(7), 873–886 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sano A, Nakamura H. Evaluation of titanium and titanium oxides as chemo-affinity sorbents for the selective enrichment of organic phosphates. Anal. Sci.23(11), 1285–1289 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen SS, Larsen MR. Evaluation of the impact of some experimental procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.21(22), 3635–3645 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M, Domon B, Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods4(3), 231–237 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR. SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol. Cell Proteomics7(4), 661–671 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafken PR, Lampe PD. Methodologies for characterizing phosphoproteins by mass spectrometry. Cell Comm. Adhesion13(5–6), 249–262 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina H, Horn DM, Tang N, Mathivanan S, Pandey A. Global proteomic profiling of phosphopeptides using electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(7), 2199–2204 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Schwartz JC, Hunt DF, Coon JJ. A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.76(13), 3590–3598 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas F. Hühmer ZH, Sadygov R, Biringer RG, Schwartz JC. Analysis of phosphopeptides by linear ion trap mass spectrometry using multistage activation. Thermo Electron Corporation Application Note 30093.
   Google Scholar
• Zubarev RA, Horn DM, Fridriksson EK et al. Electron capture dissociation for structural characterization of multiply charged protein cations. Anal. Chem.72(3), 563–573 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Warren P, Shakey Q et al. Integrating titania enrichment, iTRAQ labeling, and Orbitrap CID-HCD for global identification and quantitative analysis of phosphopeptides. Proteomics10(11), 2224–2234 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ficarro SB, Li S, Marto JA. Optimized Orbitrap HCD for quantitative analysis of phosphopeptides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spec.20(8), 1425–1434 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraj N, D’Souza RC, Cox J, Olsen JV, Mann M. Feasibility of large scale phosphoproteomics with HCD fragmentation. J. Proteome Res.9(12), 6786–6794 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Schwartz JC, Griep-Raming J et al. A dual pressure linear ion trap Orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell Proteomics8(12), 2759–2769 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaney DL, McAlister GC, Coon JJ. Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods5(11), 959–964 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar