Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?

References

• National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection report no. 160. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, MD, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation116, 1290–1305 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N. Engl. J. Med.361, 849–857 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. 2003 Nuclear Medicine Census Market Summary Report. IMV Medical Information Division, IL, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• No authors listed. 2004 CT Census Market Summary Report. IMV Medical Information Division, IL, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• No authors listed. 2003 Cardiac Catheterization Lab Census Market Summary Report. IMV Medical Information Division, IL, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R et al.Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures a population-based analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56, 702–711 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann. ICRP37(2–4), 1–332 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation NRC. Health Risks from Exposures to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. BEIR VII Phase 2. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Jacob P, Ruhm W, Walsh L, Blettner M, Hammer G, Zeeb H. Is cancer risk of radiation workers larger than expected? Occup. Environ. Med.66, 789–796 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce DA, Preston DL. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat. Res.154, 178–186 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston DL, Pierce DA, Shimizu Y et al. Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat. Res.162, 377–389 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat. Res.168, 1–64 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M et al. The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk Among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat. Res.167, 396–416 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Haylock RG et al. Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. Br. J. Cancer100, 206–212 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA298, 317–323 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faletra FF, D’Angeli I, Klersy C et al. Estimates of lifetime attributable risk of cancer after a single radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography. Heart96, 927–932 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch. Intern. Med.169, 2078–2086 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch. Intern. Med.169, 2071–2077 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinendegen LE. Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. Br. J. Radiol.78, 3–7 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klungland A, Rosewell I, Hollenbach S et al. Accumulation of premutagenic DNA lesions in mice defective in removal of oxidative base damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96, 13300–13305 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouget JP, Frelon S, Ravanat JL, Testard I, Odin F, Cadet J. Formation of modified DNA bases in cells exposed either to γ radiation or to high-LET particles. Radiat. Res.157, 589–595 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson K, Sun N, Huang M et al. Effect of ionizing radiation on self-renewal and pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. Cancer Res.70, 5539–5548 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders C. Radiation Hormesis and the Linear-No-Threshold Assumption. Springer, PA, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Tapio S, Jacob V. Radioadaptive response revisited. Radiat. Environ. Biophys.46, 1–12 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes PJ, Day TK, Swinburne SJ et al.In vivo mutagenic effect of very low dose radiation. Dose Res.4, 309–316 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ina Y, Tanooka H, Yamada T, Sakai K. Suppression of thymic lymphoma induction by life-long low-dose-rate irradiation accompanied by immune activation in C57BL/6 mice. Radiat. Res.163, 153–158 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright EG, Coates PJ. Untargeted effects of ionizing radiation: implications for radiation pathology. Mutat. Res.597, 119–132 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullenders L, Atkinson M, Paretzke H, Sabatier L, Bouffler S. Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation. Nat. Rev. Cancer9, 596–604 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojima M, Ban N, Kai M. DNA double-strand breaks induced by very low x-ray doses are largely due to bystander effects. Radiat. Res.170, 365–371 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimore SA, Chrystal JA, Robinson JI, Coates PJ, Wright EG. Chromosomal instability in unirradiated hemaopoietic cells induced by macrophages exposed in vivo to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res.68, 8122–8126 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell100, 57–70 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkamm K, Lobrich M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 5057–5062 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rube CE, Grudzenski S, Kuhne M et al. DNA double-strand break repair of blood lymphocytes and normal tissues analysed in a preclinical mouse model: implications for radiosensitivity testing. Clin. Cancer Res.14, 6546–6555 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beels L, Bacher K, De Wolf D, Werbrouck J, Thierens H. γ-H2AX foci as a biomarker for patient x-ray exposure in pediatric cardiac catheterization: are we underestimating radiation risks? Circulation120, 1903–1909 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier L, Ricoul M, Pottier G, Murnane JP. The loss of a single telomere can result in instability of multiple chromosomes in a human tumor cell line. Mol. Cancer Res.3, 139–150 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler D, Genesca A, Arnedo G, Egozcue J, Tusell L. Telomere dysfunction drives chromosomal instability in human mammary epithelial cells. Genes Chromosomes Cancer44, 339–350 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse J, Jackson SP. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science297, 547–551 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti F, Coleman MA, Jones IM, Wyrobek AJ. Candidate protein biodosimeters of human exposure to ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.82, 605–639 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakkenist CJ, Kastan MB. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature421, 499–506 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AM, Byrd PJ. Molecular pathology of ataxia telangiectasia. J. Clin. Pathol.58, 1009–1015 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo Y, Wright SM, Maas SA et al. The nonhomologous end joining factor Artemis suppresses multi-tissue tumor formation and prevents loss of heterozygosity. Oncogene26, 6010–6020 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short SC, Bourne S, Martindale C, Woodcock M, Jackson SP. DNA damage responses at low radiation doses. Radiat. Res.164, 292–302 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobrich M, Jeggo PA. The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction. Nat. Rev. Cancer7, 861–869 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marples B, Wouters BG, Joiner MC. An association between the radiation-induced arrest of G2-phase cells and low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a plausible underlying mechanism? Radiat. Res.160, 38–45 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portess DI, Bauer G, Hill MA, O’Neill P. Low-dose irradiation of nontransformed cells stimulates the selective removal of precancerous cells via intercellular induction of apoptosis. Cancer Res.67, 1246–1253 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobrich M, Rief N, Kuhne M et al.In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102, 8984–8989 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundson SA, Do KT, Vinikoor LC et al. Integrating global gene expression and radiation survival parameters across the 60 cell lines of the National Cancer Institute Anticancer Drug Screen. Cancer Res.68, 415–424 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundson SA, Bittner M, Meltzer P, Trent J, Fornace AJ Jr. Induction of gene expression as a monitor of exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiat. Res.156, 657–661 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fachin AL, Mello SS, Sandrin-Garcia P et al. Gene expression profiles in human lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with low doses of γ rays. Radiat. Res.168, 650–665 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundson SA, Lee RA, Koch-Paiz CA et al. Differential responses of stress genes to low dose-rate γ irradiation. Mol. Cancer Res.1, 445–452 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US FDA. Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. US FDA, MD, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA301, 2340–2348 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBounty TM, Leipsic J, Mancini GB et al. Effect of a standardized radiation dose reduction protocol on diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomographic angiography. Am. J. Cardiol.106, 287–292 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Kim CH, Baumueller S et al. Scan length adjustment of CT coronary angiography using the calcium scoring scan: effect on radiation dose. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.194, W272–W277 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Labounty TM, Leipsic J, Min JK et al. Effect of padding duration on radiation dose and image interpretation in prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.194, 933–937 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogalla P, Blobel J, Kandel S et al. Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior–posterior chest diameter. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging26(8), 933–940 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation120, 867–875 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 1587–1605 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 1475–1497 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Cerqueira M, Douglas PS et al. A multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55, 156–162 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JA, Raichlin E, Williamson EE et al. Evaluation of coronary CTA appropriateness criteria in an academic medical center. J. Am. Coll. Radiol.7, 125–131 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayyad AE, Cole J, Syed A et al. Temporal trends in utilization of cardiac computed tomography. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.3, 16–21 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Committee on the Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment. Twelfth Report. The impact of personally linked x-ray computed tomography scanning for the health assessment of asymptomatic individuals. Produced by the Health Protection Agency for the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment. Publisher: Crown (2007).
   Google Scholar
• National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. National Lung Screening Trial. Radiology: overview and study design. Radiology258, 243–253 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar