Product-experience reporting on endocardial defibrillation leads: a 4-year national perspective

References

• Amin MS, Ellenbogen KA. Focus on management of pacemaker and ICD advisories, recalls, and alerts. Curr. Treat. Options Cardiovasc. Med.8, 347–352 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kapa S, Hyberger L, Rea RF, Hayes DL. Complication risk with pulse generator change: implications when reacting to a device advisory or recall. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.30, 730–733 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Catanchin A, Anderson L, Jones S, Ward D. When life-saving devices terminate life. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.19, 316–318 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Maisel WH. Pacemaker and ICD generator reliability: meta-analysis of device registries. JAMA295, 1929–1934 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisel WH, Moynahan M, Zuckerman BD et al. Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports. JAMA295, 1901–1906 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Gropp M, Ludgate S, Vardas P, Brugada J, Priori SG; Writing committee for the European Heart Rhythm Association guidance document on cardiac rhythm management product performance. European Heart Rhythm Association guidance document on cardiac rhythm management product performance. Europace8, 313–322 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Maisel WH. Safety issues involving medical devices: implications of recent implantable cardioverter–defibrillator malfunctions. JAMA294, 955–958 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser RG, Hayes DL, Epstein AE et al. Multicenter experience with failed and recalled implantable cardioverter–defibrillator pulse generators. Heart Rhythm3, 640–644 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amin MS, Matchar DB, Wood MA, Ellenbogen KA. Management of recalled pacemakers and implantable cardioverter–defibrillators: a decision analysis model. JAMA296, 412–420 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould PA, Krahn AD; Canadian Heart Rhythm Society working group on device advisories. Complications associated with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories. JAMA295, 1907–1911 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL. Pacemaker and ICD malfunction – an incomplete picture. JAMA295, 1944–1946 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kleemann T, Becker T, Doenges K et al. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter–defibrillators over a period of >10 years. Circulation115, 2474–2480 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser RG, Kallinen LM, Almquist AK, Gornick CC, Katsiyiannis WT. Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter–defibrillator lead. Heart Rhythm4, 892–896 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenigsberg DN, Mirchandani S, Dover AN et al. Sensing failure associated with the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.19, 270–274 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Maisel WH. Increased failure rate of a polyurethane ICD lead. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25, 877– 878 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Pratt TRH, Pulling CC, Stanton MS. Prospective device studies versus returned product analysis as a predictor of system survival. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.23, 1150–1155 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Suga C, Hayes DL, Hyberger LK, Lloyd MA. Is there an adverse outcome from abandoned pacing leads? J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.4, 493–499 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennergren C. A European perspective on lead extraction: part I. Heart Rhythm5, 160–162 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kennergren C. A European perspective on lead extraction: part II. Heart Rhythm5, 320–323 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bongiorni MG, Giannola G, Arena G et al. Pacing and implantable cardioverter–defibrillator transvenous lead extraction. Ital. Heart J.3, 261–266 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Neuzil P, Taborsky M, Rezek Z et al. Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection seaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trial. Europace2, 98–104 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Uslan DZ, Sohail MR, St Sauver JL et al. Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection: a population-based study. Arch. Intern. Med.167, 669–675 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Wilkoff BL. Intravascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extraction: a state-of-the-art review. Heart Rhythm1, 739–745 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrd CL, Wilkoff BL, Love CJ et al. Intravascular extraction of problematic or infected permanent pacemaker leads: 1994–1996. U.S. Extraction Database, MED Institute. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.9, 1348–1357 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Goette A, Cantu F, van Erven L et al.; Scientific Initiative Committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Performance and survival of transvenous defibrillation leads: need for a European data registry. Europace11(1), 31–34 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, Shepard RK et al. Detection and management of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failure: incidence and clinical implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41, 73–80 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson BD, Gillberg JM, Wood MA, Vijayaraman P, Shepard RK, Ellenbogen KA. Development and testing of an algorithm to detect implantable cardioverter–defibrillator lead failure. Heart Rhythm3, 155–162 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Møller M, Arnsbo P, Asklund M et al. Quality assessment of pacemaker implantations in Denmark. Europace4, 107–112 (2002).
   Google Scholar