Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective

References

• Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. US NIH Publication No. 07-6225, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Brennan PF, Strombom I. Improving healthcare by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.5(3), 257–262 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Steiner JF. Patient treatment preferences in localized prostate carcinoma: the influence of emotion, misconception, and anecdote. Cancer107(3), 620–630 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Bodardus S, Wittnik DR. Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with adaptive conjoint analysis. Med. Care39(11), 1203–1216 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SP, Knight SJ, Tomori C et al. Health literacy and shared decision-making for prostate cancer patients with low socioeconomic status. Cancer Invest.19(7), 684–691 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar S, Oort F, Sprangers M et al. Predictors of patients’ choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study. Br. J. Cancer90(11), 2123–2130 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision-making: who really wants to participate? Med. Care38(3), 335–341 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J. Clin. Oncol. (11), 2883–2885 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caress AL, Beaver K, Luker K, Campbell M, Woodcock A. Involvement in treatment decisions: what do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey. Thorax60(3), 199–205 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc. Sci.Med.52(12), 1865–1878 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, Lowery JC, Goldfarb SL, Wilkins EG. Patient–physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J. Clin. Oncol.22(15), 3091–3098 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision-making. A national study of public preferences. J. Gen. Intern. Med.20(6), 531–535 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc. Sci.Med.27(11), 1139–1145 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Cox A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Langridge C, Fallowfield L. Information needs and experiences: an audit of UK cancer patients. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs.10(4), 263–272 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br. J. Cancer84(1), 48–51 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubel PA. Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make ‘good’ decisions. Med. Care40(Suppl. 9), V39–V44 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: a comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Educ. Couns.65(3), 342–350 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimori M, Parker PA, Akechi T, Sakano Y, Baile WF, Uchitomi Y. Japanese cancer patients’ communication style preferences when receiving bad news. Psychooncology16(7), 617–625 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PA et al. Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting. J. Clin. Oncol.22(9), 1721–1730 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo MF, Cohen DR, Hood K et al. Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments. Br. J. Gen. Pract.56(522), 35–42 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson SL, Buell S, Zettler P, White M, Ruston DC, Lo B. Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it? J. Gen. Intern. Med.19(11), 1069–1079 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ. Couns.39(1), 49–59 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn KE, Smith MA, Vanness D. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision-making. Soc. Sci. Med.63(5), 1158–1169 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan BM, Dimidjian S, Rizvi SL. Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression. Behav.Res. Ther.48(8), 799–804 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Peters E. Beyond information: exploring patients’ preferences. JAMA302(2), 195–197 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk S, van Roosmalen MS, Otten W, Stalmeier PF. Decision-making regarding prophylactic mastectomy: stability of preferences and the impact of anticipated feelings of regret. J. Clin. Oncol.26(14), 2358–2363 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clements A, Henderson BJ, Tyndel S et al. Diagnosed with breast cancer while on a family history screening programme: an exploratory qualitative study. Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl.)17(3), 245–252 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, McGraw S. Participation in medical decision-making: the patients’ perspective. Med. Decis. Making27(5), 533–538 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Steffel M, Goldstein DG. Making better decisions: from measuring to constructing preferences. Health Psychol.24(Suppl. 4), S17–S22 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. Shared mind: communication, decision-making, and autonomy in serious illness. Ann. Fam. Med.9(5), 454–461 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. The construction of preference. Am. Psychol.50, 364–371 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepucha K, Ozanne EM. How to define and measure concordance between patients’ preferences and medical treatments: a systematic review of approaches and recommendations for standardization. Patient Educ. Couns.78(1), 12–23 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Silvia K, Partridge A, Mulley AG Jr. An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Educ. Couns.65(2), 261–269 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, Mulley AG Jr, Henderson JV Jr, Wennberg JE. Patient reactions to a program designed to facilitate patient participation in treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Med. Care33(8), 771–782 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift JK, Callahan JL. The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Psychol.65(4), 368–381 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leykin Y, Derubeis RJ, Gallop R, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, Hollon SD. The relation of patients’ treatment preferences to outcome in a randomized clinical trial. Behav. Ther.38(3), 209–217 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raue PJ, Schulberg HC, Heo M, Klimstra S, Bruce ML. Patients’ depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: a randomized primary care study. Psychiatr. Serv.60(3), 337–343 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. BMJ337, a1864(2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F et al. Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review. JAMA293(9), 1089–1099 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann. Intern. Med.92(6), 832–836 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallowfield LJ. Treatment decision-making in breast cancer: the patient–doctor relationship. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.112(Suppl. 1), 5–13 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J. Clin.52(3), 134–149 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams MV, Davis T, Parker RM, Weiss BD. The role of health literacy in patient–physician communication. Fam. Med.34(5), 383–389 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulsky JA. Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers, and families. J. Palliat. Med.8(Suppl. 1), S95–S102 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ. The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann. Oncol.8(9), 857–863 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions. Patient Educ. Couns.61(3), 319–341 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ, Cunningham C, Hillis SL, Kaboli PJ. Patient preference for and reports of provider behavior: impact of symmetry on patient outcomes. Health Psychol.28(6), 660–667 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wijk AJ, Buchanan H, Coulson N, Hoogstraten J. Preparatory information for third molar extraction: does preference for information and behavioral involvement matter? Patient Educ. Couns.79(1), 94–99 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, Arora NK, Gueguen JA, Makoul G. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ. Couns.86(1), 9–18 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattellari M, Ward JE. Measuring men’s preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right. J. Eval. Clin. Pract.11(3), 237–246 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr. Aiding medical decision-making: a communication perspective. Med. Decis. Making27(5), 550–553 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards A, Elwyn G. Inside the black box of shared decision-making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expect.9(4), 307–320 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer H, Ironson G, Schneiderman N, Hautzinger M. “It’s my body”’: does patient involvement in decision-making reduce decisional conflict? Med. Decis.Making27(5), 522–532 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv. Res.40(3), 745–767 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel BA, Leonhart R, Helmes AW. Communication matters: the impact of communication and participation in decision-making on breast cancer patients’ depression and quality of life. Patient Educ. Couns.77(3), 391–397 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision-making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology15(1), 9–19 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Haidet P. Beliefs about control in the physician–patient relationship: effect on communication in medical encounters. J. Gen. Inter. Med.18(8), 609–616 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell TA, Auerbach SM, Kiesler DJ. Relationship of interpersonal behaviors and health-related control appraisals to patient satisfaction and compliance in a university health center. J. Am. Coll. Health55(6), 333–340 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R. When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J. Fam. Pract.50(12), 1057–1062 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik AD, Street RL Jr, Castillo D, Abraham NS. Health literacy and decision-making styles for complex antithrombotic therapy among older multimorbid adults. Patient Educ. Couns.85(3), 499–504 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein MD, Stocking CB, Antel JP, Beckwith J, Roos RP, Siegler M. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and life-sustaining therapy: patients’ desires for information, participation in decision-making, and life-sustaining therapy. Mayo Clin. Proc.66(9), 906–913 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruchno RA, Rovine MJ, Cartwright F, Wilson-Genderson M. Stability and change in patient preferences and spouse substituted judgments regarding dialysis continuation. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.63(2), S81–S91 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician–patient relationships. J. Gen. Intern. Med.25(7), 741–745 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley T. Distributed decision-making: the anatomy of decisions-in-action. Sociol. Health Illn.30(3), 429–444 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey RM, Kazis L, Lee AF. Decision-making preference and opportunity in VA ambulatory care patients: association with patient satisfaction. Res. Nurs.Health22(1), 39–48 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J. Clin. Oncol.20(6), 1473–1479 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Miron-Shatz T. Deliberation before determination: the definition and evaluation of good decision-making. Health Expect.13(2), 139–147 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson US, Svardsudd K, Wedel H, Saljo R. Patient involvement in decision-making in surgical and orthopaedic practice. Effects of outcome of operation and care process on patients’ perception of their involvement in the decision-making process. Scand. J. Caring Sci.6(2), 87–96 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watzlawick P, Bevelas J, Jackson D. The Pragmatics of Human Communication: a Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. Norton, NY, USA (1967).
   Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ. Couns.74(3), 295–301 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med. Decis. Making17(3), 298–306 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffett JK, Torgerson D, Bell-Syer S et al. Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. BMJ319(7205), 279–283 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce WB, Cronen V. Communication, Action, and Meaning: the Creation of Social Realities. Preager, NY, USA (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Cappella JN. The role of theory in developing effective health communications. J. Commun.56, S1–S17 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnato AE, Anthony DL, Skinner J, Gallagher PM, Fisher ES. Racial and ethnic differences in preferences for end-of-life treatment. J. Gen. Intern. Med.24(6), 695–701 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givens JL, Houston TK, Van Voorhees BW, Ford DE, Cooper LA. Ethnicity and preferences for depression treatment. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry29(3), 182–191 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried TR, van DC, O’Leary JR, Tinetti ME, Drickamer MA. Older person’s preferences for home vs hospital care in the treatment of acute illness. Arch. Intern. Med.160(10), 1501–1506 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapral MK, Devon J, Winter AL, Wang J, Peters A, Bondy SJ. Gender differences in stroke care decision-making. Med. Care44(1), 70–80 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CJ, Gray SW, Lewis N. Internet use leads cancer patients to be active healthcare consumers. Patient Educ. Couns.81(Suppl.), S63–S69 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber BS, Eiser AR. The patient–physician relationship in the internet age: future prospects and the research agenda. J. Med. Intern. Res.3(2), E15(2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Felson DT, Wittink DR. Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis.63(11), 1372–1378 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan DS, Spencer AJ. Factors influencing choice of dental treatment by private general practitioners. Int. J. Behav. Med.9(2), 94–110 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guidry JJ, Aday LA, Zhang D, Winn RJ. Transportation as a barrier to cancer treatment. Cancer Pract.5(6), 361–366 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of healthcare satisfaction. Med. Care31(12), 1138–1149 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton D, Blundell N, Jones M, Fraser A, Elwyn G. Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it? Patient Educ. Couns.80(2), 173–179 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision-making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J. Clin. Epidemiol.45(9), 941–950 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan TJ, Lubarsky DA, Flood EM et al. Patient preferences for acute pain treatment. Br. J. Anaesth.92(5), 681–688 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von WC, Halligan S, Atkin WS, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J. Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences. Health Expect.12(1), 18–26 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science211(4481), 453–458 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards A, Thomas R, Williams R, Ellner AL, Brown P, Elwyn G. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ.Couns.63(3), 336–349 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel R, Traut-Mattausch E, Frey D et al. Do physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options? Health Expect.15(1), 23–31 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politi MC, Street RL Jr. The importance of communication in collaborative decision-making: facilitating shared mind and the management of uncertainty. J. Eval. Clin. Pract.17(4), 579–584 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan KA, Greene PG, Shuster JL, Partridge EE, Tucker DC. Treatment preferences in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.86(2), 200–211 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jansen SJ, Kievit J, Nooij MA, Stiggelbout AM. Stability of patients’ preferences for chemotherapy: the impact of experience. Med. Decis. Making21(4), 295–306 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks JC, Cook EF, O’Day SJ et al. Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA279(21), 1709–1714 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision-making: a narrative review. Patient Educ. Couns.60(2), 102–114 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision-making. JAMA291(19), 2359–2366 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger AL, Fehnel SE, Hogue SL, Bennett L, Edin HM. An assessment of patient preference and adherence to treatment with Wellbutrin SR: a web-based survey. J. Affect. Disord.90(2–3), 217–221 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS et al. Shared treatment decision-making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.181(6), 566–577 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensing JM, Verheul W. The silent healer: the role of communication in placebo effects. Patient Educ. Couns.80(3), 293–299 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malani A, Houser D. Expectations mediate objective physiological placebo effects. Adv. Health Econ. Health Serv. Res.20, 311–327 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verheul W, Sanders A, Bensing J. The effects of physicians’ affect-oriented communication style and raising expectations on analogue patients’ anxiety, affect and expectancies. Patient Educ. Couns.80(3), 300–306 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez-Almazor ME, Looney C, Liu Y et al. A randomized controlled trial of acupuncture for osteoarthritis of the knee: effects of patient–provider communication. Arthritis Care Res.62(9), 1229–1236 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman ME. Perceived control over age-related declines: adaptive beliefs and behaviors. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.15, 282–286 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach MC, Duggan PS, Moore RD. Is patients’ preferred involvement in health decisions related to outcomes for patients with HIV? J. Gen. Intern. Med.22(8), 1119–1124 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider A, Wensing M, Quinzler R, Bieber C, Szecsenyi J. Higher preference for participation in treatment decisions is associated with lower medication adherence in asthma patients. Patient Educ. Couns.67(1–2), 57–62 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richter A, Anton SE, Koch P, Dennett SL. The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes. Clin. Ther.25(8), 2307–2335 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YY, Lin JL. Do patient autonomy preferences matter? Linking patient-centered care to patient–physician relationships and health outcomes. Soc. Sci.Med.71(10), 1811–1818 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• DesHarnais S, Carter RE, Hennessy W, Kurent JE, Carter C. Lack of concordance between physician and patient: reports on end-of-life care discussions. J. Palliat. Med.10(3), 728–740 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirt CF, Mackillop WJ, Ginsburg AD et al. Do doctors know when their patients don’t? A survey of doctor–patient communication in lung cancer. Lung Cancer18(1), 1–20 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple W, Toews J, Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Taenzer P, Parboosingh EJ. Concordance in communication between surgeon and patient. Can. J. Surg.41(6), 439–445 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Haidet P. How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients’ health beliefs. J. Gen. Intern. Med.26(1), 21–27 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florin J, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M. Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: a comparative study of nurses’ and patients’ perceptions. J. Clin. Nurs.15(12), 1498–1508 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer94(7), 2076–2080 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox K, Britten N, Hooper R, White P. Patients’ involvement in decisions about medicines: GPs’ perceptions of their preferences. Br. J. Gen. Pract.57(543), 777–784 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Cauthen D, Buchwald E, Wiprud R. Patients’ predispositions to discuss health issues affecting quality of life. Fam. Med.27(10), 663–670 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofmann JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB et al. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preference for outcomes and risks of treatment. Ann. Intern. Med.127(1), 1–12 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision-making: a review of published surveys. Behav. Med.24(2), 81–88 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran J, Bekker H, Latchford G. Everyday use of patient-centred, motivational techniques in routine consultations between doctors and patients with diabetes. Patient Educ. Couns.73(2), 224–231 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med. Care43(10), 960–969 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandbelt LC, Smets EM, Oort FJ, Godfried MH, de Haes HC. Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians’ patient-centred communication matter? Patient Educ. Couns.65(3), 396–406 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Voigt B, Geyer C Jr, Manning T, Swanson GP. Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer76(11), 2275–2285 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissow LS, Roter DL, Wilson ME. Pediatrician interview style and mothers’ disclosure of psychosocial issues. Pediatrics93(2), 289–295 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Richardson MN, Cox V, Suarez-Almazor ME. (Mis)understanding in patient–healthcare provider communication about total knee replacement. Arthritis Rheum.61(1), 100–107 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB et al. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician–patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Am. J. Med.105(3), 222–229 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann. Intern. Med.125(9), 763–769 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Stalmeier PF, van Lin EN et al. Do patients with localized prostate cancer treatment really want more aggressive treatment? J. Clin. Oncol.24(28), 4581–4586 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Leer JW, van Lin EN et al. Offering a treatment choice in the irradiation of prostate cancer leads to better informed and more active patients, without harm to wellbeing. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.70(2), 442–448 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Caputo GC. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J. Gen. Intern. Med.4(6), 506–511 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deadman JM, Leinster SJ, Owens RG, Dewey ME, Slade PD. Taking responsibility for cancer treatment. Soc. Sci. Med.53(5), 669–677 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botti S, Orfali K, Iyengar SS. Tragic choices: autonomy and emotional responses to medical decisions. J. Consumer Res.36, 337–352 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lee JK, Lippman ME, d’Angelo T. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: distress sequelae as a function of choice. J. Clin. Oncol.7(3), 367–375 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen SJ, Otten W, van de Velde CJ, Nortier JW, Stiggelbout AM. The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life. Br. J. Cancer91(1), 56–61 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffery KJ, Turner R, Macaskill P, Walter SD, Chan SF, Irwig L. Determining the impact of informed choice: separating treatment effects from the effects of choice and selection in randomized trials. Med. Decis. Making31(2), 229–236 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN, Tosteson AN et al. Design of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine27(12), 1361–1372 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar