718
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Demand for male contraception

&
Pages 605-613 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Smith PE. The disabilities caused by hypophysectomy and their repair: the tuberal (hypothalamic) syndrome in the rat. JAMA. 88, 158–161 (1927).
  • McCullagh EP, McGurl FJ. Further observation on the clinical use of testosterone propionate. J. Urol. 42, 1256–1267 (1939).
  • Heckel NJ. Production of oligospermia in a man by the use of testosterone propionate. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 40, 658–659 (1939).
  • WHO Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men. Lancet 336, 955–959 (1990).
  • WHO Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in normal men. Fertil. Steril. 65, 821–829 (1996).
  • Diczfalusy E. World Health Organization special programme of research, development, and research training in human reproduction. The first fifteen years: a review. 34(1), 113–119 (1986).
  • Wu FCW. Male contraception. Baillieres Clin. Obstet. and Gynaecol. 10(1), 1–23. (1996).
  • Lyttle CR, Kopf GS. Status and future direction of male contraceptive development. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 3(6), 667–671 (2003).
  • Walton M, Anderson RA. Hormonal contraception in men. Curr. Drug Targets Immune Endocr. Metabol. Disord. 5(3), 249–257 (2005).
  • Song L, Gu Y, Lu W, Liang X, Chen Z. A phase II randomized controlled trial of a novel male contraception, an intra-vas device. Int. J. Androl. 29(4), 489–495 (2006).
  • Chaudhury K, Bhattacharyya AK, Guha SK. Studies on the membrane integrity of human sperm treated with a new injectable male contraceptive. Hum. Reprod. 19(8), 1826–1830 (2004).
  • Darszon A, López-Martínez P, Acevedo JJ, Hernández-Cruz A, Treviño CL. T-type Ca2+ channels in sperm function. Cell Calcium 40(2), 241–252 (2006).
  • Amobi NI, Chung IP, Smith IC. Attenuation of contractility in rat epididymal vas deferens by Rho kinase inhibitors. Auton. Autacoid Pharmacol. 26(2), 169–181 (2006).
  • Cheng CY, Mruk DD. New frontiers in nonhormonal male contraception. Contraception 82(5), 476–482 (2010).
  • Zhang GY, Gu YQ, Wang XH, Cui YG, Bremner WJ. A clinical trial of injectable testosterone undecanoate as a potential male contraceptive in normal Chinese men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84(10), 3642–3647 (1999).
  • Page ST, Amory JK, Bremner WJ. Advances in male contraception. Endocr. Rev. 29(4), 465–493 (2008).
  • Handelsman DJ. Editorial: Hormonal male contraception – lessons from the east when the western market fails. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88(2), 559–561 (2003).
  • Potts M. The myth of a male pill. Nat. Med. 2(4), 398–399 (1996).
  • Gu YQ, Wang XH, Xu D et al. A multicenter contraceptive efficacy study of injectable testosterone undecanoate in healthy Chinese men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88(2), 562–568 (2003).
  • Turner L, Conway AJ, Jimenez M et al. Contraception efficacy of a depot progestin and androgen combination in men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 4659–4667 (2003).
  • Amory JK, Page ST, Bremner WJ. Drug insight: Recent advances in male hormonal contraception. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2(1), 32–41 (2006).
  • Schearer BS, Alvarez-Sanchez F, Anseimo J et al. Hormonal contraception for men. Int. J. Androl. 1(2b), 680–712 (1978).
  • Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Delivering non-hormonal contraceptives to men: advances and obstacles. Trends Biotechnol. 26(2), 90–99 (2008).
  • Liu PY, Swerdloff RS, Christenson PD, Handelsman DJ, Wang C; Hormonal Male Contraception Summit Group. Rate, extent, and modifiers of spermatogenic recovery after hormonal male contraception: an integrated analysis. Lancet 367(9520), 1412–1420 (2006).
  • Matthiesson KL, McLachlan RI. Male hormonal contraception: concept proven, product in sight? Hum. Reprod. Update 12(4), 463–482 (2006).
  • Waites GMH. Development of methods of male contraception: impact of the World Health Organization Task Force. Fertil. Steril. 80(1) (2003).
  • Wu FC. Hormonal approaches to male contraception: approaching reality. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 250(1-2), 2–7 (2006).
  • Ringheim K. Whither methods for men? Emerging gender issues in contraception. Reprod. Health Matters. 7, 79–89 (1996).
  • Glasier A. Acceptability of contraception for men: a review. Contraception 82(5), 453–456 (2010).
  • Amory JK, Page ST, Anawalt BD, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ. Acceptability of a combination of testosterone gel and depomedroxyprogesteroneacetate male contraceptive regimen. Contraception 75, 218–223 (2007).
  • Meriggiola MC, Cerpolini S, Bremner WJ et al. Acceptability of an injectable male contraceptive regimen of norethisterone enanthate and testosterone undecanoate for men. Hum. Reprod. 21(8), 2033–2040 (2006).
  • Zhang L, Shah IH, Liu Y, Vogelsong KM, Zhang L. The acceptability of an injectable, once-a-month male contraceptive in China. Contraception 73(5), 548–553 (2006).
  • Martin CW, Anderson RA, Cheng L et al. Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations. Hum. Reprod. 15(3), 637–645 (2000).
  • Glasier AF, Anakwe R, Everington D et al. Would women trust their partners to use a male pill? Hum. Reprod. 15(3), 646–649 (2000).
  • Weston GC, Schlipalius ML, Bhuinneain MN, Vollenhoven BJ. Will Australian men use male hormonal contraception? A survey of a postpartum population. Med. J. Aust. 176(5), 208–210 (2002).
  • Singh S, Darroch JE, Ashford LS, Vlassoff M. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and newborn health. Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund (2003).
  • United Nations, Population Division. World contraceptive use 2011, wall chart. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011).
  • Vaughan B, Trussell J, Kost K, Singh S, Jones R. Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception 78, 271–283 (2008).
  • United Nations. Levels and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 1998. New York Department of International Economic and Social Affairs (2000).
  • National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: preliminary data for 2009. Natl. Vital. Stat. Rep. 59(3) (2010).
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. Child support enforcement FY 2010 preliminary report. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement (2001).
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. Child support enforcement FY 2010 preliminary report. Administration for Children and Families (2011).
  • Walsh TL, Frezieres RG, Peacock K et al. Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials. Contraception 70(5), 407–413 (2004).
  • Heinemann K, Saad F, Wiesemes M, White S, Heinemann L. Attitudes toward male fertility control: results of a multinational survey on four continents. Hum. Reprod. 20(2), 549–556 (2005).
  • Walker SZ. Attitudes to a male contraceptive pill in a group of contraceptive users in the UK. J. Men’s Health 8(4), 267–273 (2011).
  • Marcell AV, Plowden K, Bowman SM. Exploring older adolescents’ and young adults’ attitudes regarding male hormonal contraception: application for clinical practice. Hum. Reprod. 20(11), 3078–3084 (2005).
  • Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD et al. Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from Cycle 6 (2002) of the national survey of family growth. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stats. 23(26) (2005).
  • United Nations. World contraceptive use 2011. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011).
  • United Nations. World population prospects, the 2004 revision, volume II: sex and age. UN Econ. and Soc. Affairs (2004).
  • Marsiglio W, Menaghan EG. Couples and the male birth control pill: a future alternative in contraceptive solutions. J. Sex Research 23(1), 34–49 (1987).
  • Grady WR, Tanfer K, Billy JO, Lincoln-Hanson J. Men’s perceptions of their roles and responsibilities regarding sex, contraception and childrearing. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 28(5), 221–226 (1996).

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.