Clinical audit to improve obstetric practice: What is the evidence?

References

• Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD000259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Beyond the Numbers: Reviewing Maternal Deaths and Complications to Make Pregnancy Safer. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Filippi V Brugha R, Browne E, Gohou V, Bacci A, De Brouwere V et al. Obstetric audit in resource-poor settings: lessons from a multicountry project auditing ‘near miss’ obstetrical emergencies. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(1):57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward HR, Howarth GR, Jennings OJ, Pattinson RC. Audit incorporating avoidability and appropriate intervention can significantly decrease perinatal mortality. S Afr Med J. 1995;85(3):147–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandin-Bojö AK, Hall-Lord ML, Axelsson O, Larsson BW. Intra-partal care in a Swedish maternity unit after a quality-improvement programme. Midwifery. 2007;23(2):113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg K, Hepburn M, McIlwaine G. An audit of caesarean section in a maternity district. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;89(10):787–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies A. Improving patient care in the UK: clinical audit in the Oxford Region. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(2):141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney GC, Glasier A, Templeton A. Multicentre criterion based audit of the management of induced abortion in Scotland. BMJ. 1994;309(6946):15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney JP, Welsh J, Owen P. Management of early pregnancy loss–a complete audit cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(3):229–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson GM, Hannah WJ, Vayda E, Singer J. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines: delivery after previous Caesarean section. JAMA. 1991;265:2202–2207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiwanuka AI, Moore WM. Influence of audit and feedback on use of caesarean section in a geographically-defined population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;50(1):59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson MS, Scudamore IW, Walsh SM. Using the medical audit cycle to reduce Caesarean section rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174(1 Pt 1):199–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GM. An audit of the implementation of guidelines to reduce wound infection following caesarean section. Health Bull (Edinb). 2000;58(1):38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce D, Stone S, Harding K. Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections–completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(3):273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoll AE, Black C, Powls A, Mackenzie F. An audit of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section at term. Scott Med J. 2004;49(1):22–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicopoullos JD, Karrar S, Gour A, Panter K. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma–completion of the audit cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(4):381–386.
   Google Scholar
• Wagaarachchi PT, Graham WJ, Penney GC, McCaw-Binns A, Yeboah Antwi K, Hall MH. Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;74(2):119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GM, McKenzie CA, Mires GJ. The use of audit to improve clinical effectiveness in an infrequent obstetric therapy: magnesium sulphate in severe pre-eclampsia. Scott Med J. 1998;43(5):151–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen P. Audit can ensure the safe and effective introduction of seizure prophylaxis with magnesium sulphate in obstetric practice. Health Bull (Edinb). 2000;58(5):414–417.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin KJ, Leighton NA, Kilby MD, et al. The ‘Severe Hypertensive Illness in Pregnancy’ (SHIP) audit: promoting quality care using a high risk monitoring chart and eclampsia treatment pack. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(4):346–352.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM. A criteria- based audit of the management of severe pre-eclampsia in Kampala, Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91(3):292–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Mutungi A, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM. Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(1):52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks AD, Alia G, Ononge S, Mutungi A, Otolorin EO, Mirembe FM. Introducing criteria based audit into Ugandan maternity units. BMJ. 2003;327(7427):1329–1331.
   Google Scholar
• Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, van den Broek N.A criterion based audit of the management of obstructed labour in Malawi. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279(5):649–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, van den Broek N. Using criteria-based audit to improve the management of postpartum haemorrhage in resource limited countries: a case study of Malawi. Matern Child Health J. 2008; Sep 9. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, van den Broek N. Criteria-based audit to improve a district referral system in Malawi: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, van den Broek N. Criteria-based audit to improve women-friendly care in maternity units in Malawi. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35(3):483–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon LC, Parsons J. Audit of the effectiveness of cervical preparation with Dilapan prior to late second-trimester (20–24 weeks) surgical termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114(4):485–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams A, Adams EJ, Bolderson J, Tincello DG, Richmond DH. Effect of a new guideline on outcome following third-degree perineal tears: results of a 3-year audit. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(6):385–389.
   Google Scholar
• Siassakos D, Anderson H, Panter K. Breech presentation: an audit project as means of pursuing clinical excellence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(7):642–647.
   Google Scholar
• Toohill J, Soong B, Meldrum M. Risk management considerations and the pregnancy handheld record. An audit of the return rate of the pregnancy handheld record. Women Birth. 2006;19(4): 113–116.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo C, Welsh J, Owen P. Antenatal corticosteroid prescribing: a complete audit cycle. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(1):33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCord N, Owen P, Powls A, Lunan B. A complete audit cycle of intrapartum group B streptococcus prophylaxis. Health Bull (Edinb). 2001;59(4):263–267.
   Google Scholar
• Bailón E, Delgado A, Montoro R, Vazquez R, Sanchez MR, Alemany V Efficacy of auditing in improving a Control Program of Pregnancy. Aten Primaria. 1992;9(2):85–88.
   Google Scholar
• Axt-Adam P, van der Wouden JC, van der Does E. Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory tests: a literature study. Med Care. 1993;31(9):784–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Evidence-led Obstetric Care: Report of a WHO Meeting–Geneva, Switzerland, 28–30 January 2004. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hearnshaw H, Harker R, Cheater F, Baker R, Grimshaw G. A study of the methods used to select review criteria for clinical audit. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(1):1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittrof R, Campbell OM, Filippi VG. What is quality in maternity care? An international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J, Gotzsche P, Kunz RA, Oxman AD, Chalmers I. . What’s so special about randomisation. In: Maynard A, Chalmers I, editors. Non-random Reflections of Health Services Research. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 1997. pp. 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Queenborough R, editor. NHS Pharmacy Audit Handbook. London, UK: National Prescribing Centre; 2000.
   Google Scholar