158
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Modeling and Simulation for Individualized Therapy of Amisulpride in Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia: Focus on Interindividual Variability, Therapeutic Reference Range and the Laboratory Alert Level

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 3903-3913 | Published online: 14 Sep 2021

References

  • CurranMP, PerryCM. Spotlight on amisulpride in schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2002;16(3):207–211. doi:10.2165/00023210-200216030-0000711888341
  • LeuchtS, CiprianiA, SpineliL, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):951–962. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60733-323810019
  • MauriMC, VolonteriLS, ColasantiA, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics: a critical review of the relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical response. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(5):359–388. doi:10.2165/00003088-200746050-0000117465637
  • HiemkeC, BergemannN, ClementHW, et al. Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: update 2017. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2018;51(1–2):e1. doi:10.1055/s-0037-160099129390205
  • LiL, LiL, ShangDW, et al. A systematic review and combined meta-analysis of concentration of oral amisulpride. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86(4):668–678. doi:10.1111/bcp.1424632090363
  • RosenzweigP, CanalM, PatatA, et al. A review of the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of amisulpride in healthy volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2002;17(1):1–13. doi:10.1002/hup.32012404702
  • BergemannN, KopitzJ, KressKR, et al. Plasma amisulpride levels in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004;14(3):245–250. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2003.09.00115056484
  • Dos Santos PereiraJN, TadjerpishehS, Abu AbedM, et al. The poorly membrane permeable antipsychotic drugs amisulpride and sulpiride are substrates of the organic cation transporters from the SLC22 family. AAPS J. 2014;16(6):1247–1258. doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9649-925155823
  • KiangTK, SherwinCM, SpigarelliMG, et al. Fundamentals of population pharmacokinetic modelling: modelling and software. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51(8):515–525. doi:10.1007/BF03261928
  • ShengL, QuY, YanJ, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation of huperzine A in elderly Chinese subjects. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2016;37(7):994–1001. doi:10.1038/aps.2016.2427180987
  • GlatardA, GuidiM, DelacrétazA, et al. Amisulpride: real-world evidence of dose adaptation and effect on prolactin concentrations and body weight gain by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(3):371–382. doi:10.1007/s40262-019-00821-w31552612
  • ReevesS, BertrandJ, D’AntonioF, et al. A population approach to characterise amisulpride pharmacokinetics in older people and Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacology(Berl). 2016;233(18):3371–3381. doi:10.1007/s00213-016-4379-627481049
  • WangZZ, JiaNX, YangLH, et al. Research on therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical application of amisulpride tablets. Chinese J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;34:2704–2706.
  • MüllerMJ, EichFX, RegenbogenB, et al. Amisulpride doses and plasma levels in different age groups of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2009;23(3):278–286. doi:10.1177/026988110808980618562411
  • ReevesS, BertrandJ, McLachlanE, et al. A population approach to guide amisulpride dose adjustments in older patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78(7):e844–e851. doi:10.4088/JCP.16m1121628858444
  • McLeaySC, MorrishGA, KirkpatrickCM, et al. The relationship between drug clearance and body size: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature published from 2000 to 2007. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51(5):319–330. doi:10.2165/11598930-000000000-0000022439649
  • CockcroftDW, GaultMH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31–41. doi:10.1159/0001805801244564
  • JönssonAK, SpigsetO, ReisM. A compilation of serum concentrations of 12 antipsychotic drugs in a therapeutic drug monitoring setting. Ther Drug Monit. 2019;41(3):348–356. doi:10.1097/FTD.000000000000058531025986
  • BowskillSV, PatelMX, HandleySA, et al. Plasma amisulpride in relation to prescribed dose, clozapine augmentation, and other factors: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 2002–2010. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012;27(5):507–513. doi:10.1002/hup.225622996618
  • WangST, LiY. Development of a UPLC-MS/MS method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of aripiprazole, amisulpride, olanzapine, paliperidone and ziprasidone with a discussion of their therapeutic reference ranges for Chinese patients. Biomed Chromatogr. 2017;31:8. doi:10.1002/bmc.3928
  • SchoretsanitisG, PaulzenM, UntereckerS, et al. TDM in psychiatry and neurology: a comprehensive summary of the consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology, update 2017; a tool for clinicians. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2018;19(3):162–174. doi:10.1080/15622975.2018.143959529493375
  • XuYJ, WangY, LuYF, et al. Age-associated differences in transporter gene expression in kidneys of male rats. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15(1):474–482. doi:10.3892/mmr.2016.597027909713
  • IvanyukA, LivioF, BiollazJ, et al. Renal drug transporters and drug interactions. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(8):825–892.28210973
  • SchmittU, Abou El-ElaA, GuoLJ, et al. Cyclosporine A (CsA) affects the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the atypical antipsychotic amisulpride probably via inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). J Neural Transm. 2006;113(7):787–801. doi:10.1007/s00702-005-0367-416252067
  • MüllerMJ, RegenbogenB, HärtterS, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring for optimizing amisulpride therapy in patients with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(8):673–679. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.10.00316324716
  • LindenM, ScheelT, Xaver EichF. Dosage finding and outcome in the treatment of schizophrenic inpatients with amisulpride. Results of a drug utilization observation study. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004;19(2):111–119. doi:10.1002/hup.57414994321