Mucoadhesive electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery systems: applications of polymers and the parameters’ roles

References

• Torres-Martinez EJ, Cornejo-Bravo JM, Serrano-Medina A, Perez-Gonzalez GL, Villarreal-Gómez LJ. A summary of electrospun nanofibers as drug delivery system: drugs loaded and biopolymers used as matrices. Curr Drug Deliv. 2018;15(10):1360–1374. doi:10.2174/156720181566618072311432630033869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal-Gómez LJ, Cornejo-Bravo JM, Vera-Graziano R, Grande D. Electrospinning as a powerful technique for biomedical applications: a critically selected survey. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2016;27(2):157–176. doi:10.1080/09205063.2015.111688526540235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son YJ, Kim WJ, Yoo HS. Therapeutic applications of electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery systems. Arch Pharm Res. 2014;37(1):69–78. doi:10.1007/s12272-013-0284-224234913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes AC, Sevilla Moreno J, Hanif M, Douglas T EL, Chen M, Chronakis IS. Morphological, mechanical and mucoadhesive properties of electrospun chitosan/phospholipid hybrid nanofibers. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2266. doi:10.3390/ijms19082266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behbood L, Karimi S, Mirzaei E, Mohammadi G, Azami M, Arkan E. Mucoadhesive chitosan electrospun nanofibers containing tetracycline and triamcinolone as a drug delivery system. Fibers Polym. 2018;19(7):1454–1462. doi:10.1007/s12221-018-8087-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brako F, Raimi-Abraham B, Mahalingam S, Craig DQM, Edirisinghe M. Making nanofibres of mucoadhesive polymer blends for vaginal therapies. Eur Polym J. 2015;70:186–196. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dott C, Tyagi C, Tomar LK, et al. A mucoadhesive electrospun nanofibrous matrix for rapid oramucosal drug delivery. J Nanomater. 2013:2013. doi:10.1155/2013/924947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie AR, Goycoolea FM, Menchicchi B, et al. Innovative methods and applications in mucoadhesion research. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17(8):1–32. doi:10.1002/mabi.201600534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng L, Xie J. Smart electrospun nanofibers for controlled drug release: recent advances and new perspectives. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(15):1944–1959. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2573266525732665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieth M, Siegel MG, Higgs RE, et al. Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs. J Med Chem. 2004;47(1):224–232. doi:10.1021/jm030267j14695836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaikh R, Raj Singh TR, Garland MJ, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3(1):89–100. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.7647821430958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddupalli B, Mohammed Z, Nath R, Banji D. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: an overview. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010;1(4):381. doi:10.4103/0110-5558.7643622247877
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(3):325–347. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.00420100560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Strandman S, hu JXX, Barralet J, Cerruti M. Genipin-crosslinked catechol-chitosan mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2015;37:395–404. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.02425453967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valizadeh A, Mussa Farkhani S. Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibres. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2014;8(2):83–92. doi:10.1049/iet-nbt.2012.004025014079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalf A, Madihally SV. Recent advances in multiaxial electrospinning for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;112:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.11.01027865991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed FE, Lalia BS, Hashaikeh R. A review on electrospinning for membrane fabrication: challenges and applications. Desalination. 2015;356:15–30. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider A, Haider S, Kang IK. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab J Chem. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.015
   Google Scholar
• Garg K, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning jets and nanofibrous structures. Biomicrofluidics. 2011;5(1):1–19. doi:10.1063/1.3567097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(15):2223–2253. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakkar S, Misra M. Electrospun polymeric nanofibers: new horizons in drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;107(July):148–167. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2017.07.00128690099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duque Sánchez LM, Rodriguez L, López M. Electrospinning: the nanofibers age. Rev Iberoam Polímeros Vol Iber Polímeros. 2014;14(141):10–27. Available from: http://www.ehu.eus/reviberpol/pdf/ENE13/duque.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mit-Uppatham C, Nithitanakul M, Supaphol P. Ultratine electrospun polyamide-6 fibers: effect of solution conditions on morphology and average fiber diameter RID C-4353-2008. Macromol Chem Phys. 2004;205(17):2327–2338. doi:10.1002/macp.200400225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper CL, Stephens JS, Tassi NG, Chase DB, Rabolt JF. Controlling surface morphology of electrospun polystyrene fibers: effect of humidity and molecular weight in the electrospinning process. Macromolecules. 2004;37(2):573–578. doi:10.1021/ma0351975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabadi SMS, Kheradmand A, Montazeri V, Ziaee H. Effects of process and ambient parameters on diameter and morphology of electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibers. Polym Sci Ser A. 2015;57(2):155–167. doi:10.1134/S0965545X15020157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodoplu D, Mutlu M. Effects of electrospinning setup and process parameters on nanofiber morphology intended for the modification of quartz crystal microbalance surfaces. J Eng Fiber Fabr. 2012;7(2):118–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinkar DM, Dhake AS, Setty CM. Drug delivery from the oral cavity: a focus on mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery systems. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2012;66(5):466–500. doi:10.5731/pdajpst.2012.0087723035030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salamat-Miller N, Chittchang M, Johnston TP. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1666–1691. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.00316183164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Rubin BK, Voynow JA. Mucins, mucus, and goblet cells. Chest. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery - A promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release. 2006;114(1):15–40. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.01216828915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho F, Bruschi ML, Evangelista RC, Gremiao MPD. Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1997;23(5):489–515. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.76478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Sharma D, Garg R. Review on mucoadhesive drug delivery system with special emphasis on buccal route: an important tool in designing of novel controlled drug delivery system for the effective delivery of pharmaceuticals. J Dev Drugs. 2017;06(01):1–12. doi:10.4172/2329-6631.1000169
   Google Scholar
• Fieldson G, Barbari TA. The Use of FTIR-ATR Spectroscopy to Characterize Diffusion in Polymers. Vol. 34 1993. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. doi:10.1016/0032-3861(93)90765-3
   Google Scholar
• Mansuri S, Kesharwani P, Jain K, Tekade RK, Jain NK. Mucoadhesion: A promising approach in drug delivery system. React Funct Polym. 2016;100:151–172. doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez I, Cerezo A, Salem II. Sistemas de liberación bioadhesivos bioadhesive delivery systems. Ars Pharm. 2000;1(41):115–128. Available from: http://150.214.24.132/ars/pdf/186.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan S, Kaur A, Aggarwal G, Harikumar SL. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: a review. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013;5(1):11–20. Available from: http://www.ijddr.in/drug-development/mucoadhesive-drug-delivery-system-a-review.php?aid=5005
   Google Scholar
• Schattling P, Taipaleenmäki E, Zhang Y, Städler B. A polymer chemistry point of view on mucoadhesion and mucopenetration. Macromol Biosci. 2017;1700060:1–20. doi:10.1002/mabi.201700060
   Google Scholar
• Harding SE. Mucoadhesive interactions. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003;31(5):1036–1041. doi:10.1042/BST031103614505475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quintanar-Guerrero D, Villalobos-García R, Alvarez-Colín E, Cornejo-Bravo JM. In vitro evaluation of the bioadhesive properties of hydrophobic polybasic gels containing N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate. Biomaterials. 2001;22(9):957–961. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00260-X11311014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campisi G, Paderni C, Saccone R, Di Fede O, Wolff A, Giannola LI. Human buccal mucosa as an innovative site of drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16(6):641–652. doi:10.2174/13816121079088377820388074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar-Chavez JJ, Merino-Sanjuan V, Lopez-Cervantes M, et al. The tape-stripping technique as a method for drug quantification in skin. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2008;11(1):104–130. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.05.01618445368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao J, Heng PWS. Buccal delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2003;29(8):821–832. doi:10.1081/DDC-12002417814570303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD. Buccal drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005;2(3):507–517. doi:10.1517/17425247.2.3.50716296771
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russo E, Selmin F, Baldassari S, et al. A focus on mucoadhesive polymers and their application in buccal dosage forms. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2016;32:113–125. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2015.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy SK, Prabhakar B. Bioadhesive polymeric platforms for transmucosal drug delivery systems - A review. Trop J Pharm Res. 2010;9(1):91–104. doi:10.4314/tjpr.v9i1.52043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1556–1568. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.00116198441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh LD, Cheng Y, Teng CP, et al. Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials. Prog Polym Sci. 2015;46:86–110. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorescu M, Bercea M, Morariu S. Biomaterials of poly(vinyl alcohol) and natural polymers. Polym Rev. 2018;58(2):247–287. doi:10.1080/15583724.2017.1403928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye M, Jiang R, Zhao J, Zhang J, Yuan X, Yuan X. In situ formation of adhesive hydrogels based on PL with laterally grafted catechol groups and their bonding efficacy to wet organic substrates. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26(12):1–13. doi:10.1007/s10856-015-5608-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppas NA, Huang Y. Nanoscale technology of mucoadhesive interactions. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(11):1675–1687. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.03.00115350296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi M, Kumar M, Pathak K. A review on mucoadhesive polymer used in nasal drug delivery system. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2(4):215. doi:10.4103/2231-4040.9087622247888
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garg T, Goyal AK. Biomaterial-based scaffolds–current status and future directions. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11(5):767–789. doi:10.1517/17425247.2014.89101424669779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan S, Cummins W, O’ Donovan O, Hughes H, Owens E. Thiolated polymers as mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;100:64–78. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.00828087353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Sandri G, Caramella CM. Buccal drug delivery: a challenge already won? Drug Discov Today Technol. 2005;2(1):59–65. doi:10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.01824981756
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khoshnevisan K, Daneshpour M, Barkhi M, Gholami M, Samadian H, Maleki H. The promising potentials of capped gold nanoparticles for drug delivery systems. J Drug Target. 2018;26(7):525–532. doi:10.1080/1061186X.2017.138779028972797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Modeling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(SUPPL):163–174. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.028
   Google Scholar
• Pundir S, Badola A, Sharma D. Sustained release matrix technology and recent advance in matrix drug delivery system: a review. Int J Drug Res Tech. 2013;3(1):12–20. ISSN 2277-1506.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro-Nicolini M, Morales JO. Overview and future potential of buccal mucoadhesive films as drug delivery systems for biologics. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2017;18(1):3–14. doi:10.1208/s12249-016-0525-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolci LS, Liguori A, Panzavolta S, et al. Non-equilibrium atmospheric pressure plasma as innovative method to crosslink and enhance mucoadhesion of econazole-loaded gelatin films for buccal drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;163:73–82. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.12.03029278802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikhpour M, Barani L, Kasaeian A. Biomimetics in drug delivery systems: a critical review. J Control Release. 2017;253:97–109. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.02628322976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider C, Langer R, Loveday D, Hair D. Applications of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (EVA) in drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2017;262(July):284–295. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.00428789964
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badshah M, Ullah H, Khan SA, Park JK, Khan T. Preparation, characterization and in-vitro evaluation of bacterial cellulose matrices for oral drug delivery. Cellulose. 2017;24(11):5041–5052. doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1474-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik R, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. Diacerein-Loaded novel gastroretentive nanofiber system using PLLA: development and in vitro characterization. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44(3):928–936. doi:10.3109/21691401.2014.100049225826646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen S, Hiorth M. Advanced drug delivery systems for local treatment of the oral cavity. Ther Deliv. 2015;6(5):197–210. doi:10.4155/tde.15.525690087
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva NHCS, Rodrigues AF, Almeida IF, et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as transdermal delivery systems for diclofenac: in vitro dissolution and permeation studies. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;106(1):264–269. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.01424721077
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mura P, Cirri M, Mennini N, Casella G, Maestrelli F. Polymeric mucoadhesive tablets for topical or systemic buccal delivery of clonazepam: effect of cyclodextrin complexation. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;152:755–763. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.07527516327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzinski WE, Palacios A, Ahmed A, Lane MA, Aminabhavi TM. Targeted delivery of small interfering RNA to colon cancer cells using chitosan and PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;147:323–332. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.04127178938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geetha P, Sivaram AJ, Jayakumar R, Mohan CG. Integration of in silico modeling, prediction by binding energy and experimental approach to study the amorphous chitin nanocarriers for cancer drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;142:240–249. doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2016.11.01126917396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Q, Lv Y, Williams GR, et al. Lactobionic acid and carboxymethyl chitosan functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposites as targeted anticancer drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:812–820. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.02427474628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani M, Bigdeli B, Jalili-Baleh L, et al. Curcumin-lipoic acid conjugate as a promising anticancer agent on the surface of gold‑iron oxide nanocomposites: a pH-sensitive targeted drug delivery system for brain cancer theranostics. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;114:175–188. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2017.12.00829248558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modaresi SMS, Mehr SE, Faramarzi MA, et al. Preparation and characterization of self-assembled chitosan nanoparticles for the sustained delivery of streptokinase: an in vivo study. Pharm Dev Technol. 2014;19(5):593–597. doi:10.3109/10837450.2013.81354223859703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharifar H, Amani A. Cytotoxicity of Chitosan/Streptokinase Nanoparticles as a Function of Size: An Artificial Neural Networks Study. Vol. 12 Elsevier Inc.;2016. Amsterdam, Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2015.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Unnithan AR, Gnanasekaran G, Sathishkumar Y, Lee YS, Kim CS. Electrospun antibacterial polyurethane-cellulose acetate-zein composite mats for wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;102(1):884–892. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.10.07024507360
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogina A. Electrospinning process: versatile preparation method for biodegradable and natural polymers and biocomposite systems applied in tissue engineering and drug delivery. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;296:221–230. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.01.098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedghi R, Shaabani A, Mohammadi Z, Samadi FY, Isaei E. Biocompatible electrospinning chitosan nanofibers: a novel delivery system with superior local cancer therapy. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;159:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.01128038737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani FM, Kaffashi B, Shokrollahi P, Seyedjafari E, Ardeshirylajimi A. PCL/chitosan/Zn-doped nHA electrospun nanocomposite scaffold promotes adipose derived stem cells adhesion and proliferation. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;118:133–142. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.07125542118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorani B, Tucker N. Fundamentals of electrospinning as a novel delivery vehicle for bioactive compounds in food nanotechnology. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;51:227–240. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes BP, Moreira AF, Gaspar VM, Correia IJ. Chitosan/arginine-chitosan polymer blends for assembly of nanofibrous membranes for wound regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;130:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.07226076606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevisan K, Maleki H, Samadian H, et al. Cellulose acetate electrospun nanofibers for drug delivery systems: applications and recent advances. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;198:131–141. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.07230092983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakney AK, Ball C, Krogstad EA, Woodrow KA. Electrospun fibers for vaginal anti-HIV drug delivery. Antiviral Res. 2013;100(SUPPL):S9–S16. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.09.02224188701
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hua D, Liu Z, Wang F, et al. pH responsive polyurethane (core) and cellulose acetate phthalate (shell) electrospun fibers for intravaginal drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:1240–1244. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.06627474676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. Development, optimization and evaluation of polymeric electrospun nanofiber: a tool for local delivery of fluconazole for management of vaginal candidiasis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2016;44(2):524–531. doi:10.3109/21691401.2014.96619425315503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong S, Wang X, Yang Y, et al. The use of cisplatin-loaded mucoadhesive nanofibers for local chemotherapy of cervical cancers in mice. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;93:127–135. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.02925843238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal U, Goyal AK, Rath G. Development and characterization of the cisplatin loaded nanofibers for the treatment of cervical cancer. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;75:125–132. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley HE, Said Z, Santocildes-Romero ME, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of novel mucoadhesive bilayer patches for local delivery of clobetasol-17-propionate to the oral mucosa. Biomaterials. 2018;178:134–146. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.00929929183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzzarelli RAA, El Mehtedi M, Bottegoni C, Aquili A, Gigante A. Genipin-crosslinked chitosan gels and scaffolds for tissue engineering and regeneration of cartilage and bone. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(12):7314–7338. doi:10.3390/md1312706826690453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mašek J, Lubasová D, Lukáč R, et al. Multi-layered nanofibrous mucoadhesive films for buccal and sublingual administration of drug-delivery and vaccination nanoparticles - important step towards effective mucosal vaccines. J Control Release. 2017;249:183–195. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.07.03627469472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonglairoum P, Ngawhirunpat T, Rojanarata T, Panomsuk S, Kaomongkolgit R, Opanasopit P. Fabrication of mucoadhesive chitosan coated polyvinylpyrrolidone/cyclodextrin/clotrimazole sandwich patches for oral candidiasis. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;132:173–179. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.03226256338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik R, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. Polymeric nanofibers: targeted gastro-retentive drug delivery systems. J Drug Target. 2015;23(2):109–124. doi:10.3109/1061186X.2014.96571525268275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatious F, Sun L, Lee C-P, Baldoni J. electrospun nanofibers in oral drug delivery. Pharm Res. 2010;27(4):576–588. doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0061-620143253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morales JO, McConville JT. Manufacture and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;77(2):187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.11.02321130875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal H, Dhakate SR, Goyal AK, Markandeywar TS, Malik B, Rath G. Development of transmucosal patch using nanofibers. Artif Cells Blood Substit Biotechnol. 2012;40(1–2):146–150. doi:10.3109/10731199.2011.637924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi C, Tomar L, Choonara YE, Du Toit LC, Kumar P, Pillay V. Electrospun nanofiber matrix with a mucoadhesive backing film for oramucosal drug delivery. Int J Mater Mech Manuf. 2014;2(1):81–85. doi:10.7763/IJMMM.2014.V2.105
   Google Scholar
• Kilicarslan M, Koerber M, Bodmeier R. In situ forming implants for the delivery of metronidazole to periodontal pockets: formulation and drug release studies. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40(5):619–624. doi:10.3109/03639045.2013.87344924369747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samprasit W, Akkaramongkolporn P, Ngawhirunpat T, Rojanarata T, Kaomongkolgit R, Opanasopit P. Fast releasing oral electrospun PVP/CD nanofiber mats of taste-masked meloxicam. Int J Pharm. 2015;487(1–2):213–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.04.04425899284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illangakoon UE, Gill H, Shearman GC, et al. Fast dissolving paracetamol/caffeine nanofibers prepared by electrospinning. Int J Pharm. 2014;477(1–2):369–379. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.10.03625455779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Sharma R, Joshi M, Garg T, Goyal AK, Rath G. Transmucosal delivery of Docetaxel by mucoadhesive polymeric nanofi bers. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2015;43(4):263–269. doi:10.3109/21691401.2014.88544224621011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brako F, Thorogate R, Mahalingam S, Raimi-Abraham B, Craig DQM, Edirisinghe M. Mucoadhesion of progesterone-loaded drug delivery nanofiber constructs. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;acsami.8b03329. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b03329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno I, González-González V, Romero-García J. Control release of lactate dehydrogenase encapsulated in poly (vinyl alcohol) nanofibers via electrospinning. Eur Polym J. 2011;47(6):1264–1272. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg T, Rath G, Goyal AK. Biomaterials-based nanofiber scaffold: targeted and controlled carrier for cell and drug delivery. J Drug Target. 2015;23(3):202–221. doi:10.3109/1061186X.2014.99289925539071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotaling NA, Khristov V, Wan Q, et al. Nanofiber scaffold-based tissue-engineered retinal pigment epithelium to treat degenerative eye diseases. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2016;32(5):272–285. doi:10.1089/jop.2015.015727110730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Park CG, Huh BK, et al. Sinonasal delivery of resveratrol via mucoadhesive nanostructured microparticles in a nasal polyp mouse model. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40249. doi:10.1038/srep4024928071713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattenbach L-O, Springer-Wanner C, Hoerauf H, et al. Intravitreal sustained-release steroid implants for the treatment of macular edema following surgical removal of epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4):232–237. doi:10.1159/00046425928463851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea W, Doherty VR, Perkins W, Aitchison TC, Mackie RM. Staphylococcus aureus and intra-nasal mupirocin in patients receiving isotretinoin for acne. Br J Dermatol. 1992;126(4):362–366. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb00679.x1533312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagnall P, Rizzolo D. Bacterial vaginosis: a practical review. J Am Acad Physician Assist. 2017;30(12):15–21. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000526770.60197.fa
   Google Scholar
• Velasco Barraza RD, Álvarez Suarez AS, Gómez LV, Paz González JA, Iglesias AL, Vera Graziano R. Designing a low cost electrospinning device for practical learning in a bioengineering biomaterials course. Rev Mex Ing Biomédica. 2016;37(1):7–16. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=61943766002
   Google Scholar
• Hu X, Liu S, Zhou G, Huang Y, Xie Z, Jing X. Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for drug delivery applications. J Control Release. 2014;185(1):12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.01824768792
   PubMedGoogle Scholar