Performance of Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate and Xenogenic Hydroxyapatite on Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Defects: Histomorphometric, Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Analysis

References

• da Silva Brum I, de Carvalho JJ, da Silva Pires JL, de Carvalho MAA, Dos Santos LBF, Elias CN. Nanosized hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate composite: physico-chemical, cytotoxicity, morphological properties and in vivo trial. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):e19602. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-56124-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudradjat H, Meyer F, Loza K, Epple M, Enax J. In vivo effects of a hydroxyapatite-based oral care gel on the calcium and phosphorus levels of dental plaque. Eur J Dent. 2020;14:206–211. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1708456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta S, Malhotra A, Jindal R, Garg SK, Kansay R, Mittal N. Role of beta tri-calcium phosphate-based composite ceramic as bone-graft expander in Masquelet’s-Induced membrane technique. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53:63–69. doi:10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_240_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Titsinides S, Agrogiannis G, Karatzas T. Bone grafting materials in dentoalveolar reconstruction: a comprehensive review. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2019;55:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.09.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rasouli R, Barhoum A, Bechelany M, Dufresne A. Nanofibers for biomedical and healthcare applications. Macromol Biosci. 2019;19:e1800256. doi:10.1002/mabi.201800256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang W, Ding P, Li G, Lu E, Zhao Z. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles facilitate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation within sagittal suture during expansion in rats. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:905–917. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S299641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha SW, Jang HL, Nam KT, Beck GR Jr. Nano-hydroxyapatite modulates osteoblast lineage commitment by stimulation of DNA methylation and regulation of gene expression. Biomaterials. 2015;65:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandooren J, Van den Steen PE, Opdenakker G. Biochemistry and molecular biology of gelatinase B or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9): the next decade. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;48:222–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grässel S, Beckmann J, Rath B, Vogel M, Grifka J, Tingart M. Expression profile of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and −9 and their endogenous tissue inhibitors in osteonecrotic femoral heads. Int J Mol Med. 2010;26:127–133. doi:10.3892/ijmm_00000444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rocha CA, Cestari TM, Vidotti HA, de Assis GF, Garlet GP, Taga R. Sintered anorganic bone graft increases autocrine expression of VEGF, MMP-2 and MMP-9 during repair of critical-size bone defects. J Mol Histol. 2014;45(4):447–461. doi:10.1007/s10735-014-9565-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao B. TNF and bone remodeling. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15:126–134. doi:10.1007/s11914-017-0358-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David JP, Schett G. TNF and bone. Curr Dir Autoimmun. 2010;11:135–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamitakahara M, Ohtsuki C, Miyazaki T. Review paper: behavior of ceramic biomaterials derived from tricalcium phosphate in physiological condition. J Biomater Appl. 2008;23:197–212. doi:10.1177/0885328208096798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solakoglu Ö, Götz W, Heydecke G, Schwarzenbach H. Histological and immunohistochemical comparison of two different allogeneic bone grafting materials for alveolar ridge reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:1002–1016. doi:10.1111/cid.12824
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorenz J, Kubesch A, Al-Maawi S, et al. Allogeneic bone block for challenging augmentation-a clinical, histological, and histomorphometrical investigation of tissue reaction and new bone formation. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:3159–3169. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2407-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pérez-González F, Molinero-Mourelle P, Sánchez-Labrador L, et al. Assessment of clinical outcomes and histomorphometric findings in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with allogeneic bone block grafts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020;25:e291–e298. doi:10.4317/medoral.23353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szymonowicz M, Korczynski M, Dobrzynski M, et al. Cytotoxicity evaluation of high-temperature annealed nanohydroxyapatite in contact with fibroblast cells. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(6):e590. doi:10.3390/ma10060590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liao S, Ngiam M, Chan CK, Ramakrishna S. Fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/osteonectin composites for bone graft applications. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:e025019. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/4/2/025019
   Google Scholar
• Ngiam M, Liao S, Patil AJ, Cheng Z, Chan CK, Ramakrishna S. The fabrication of nano-hydroxyapatite on PLGA and PLGA/collagen nanofibrous composite scaffolds and their effects in osteoblastic behavior for bone tissue engineering. Bone. 2009;45:4–16. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tampieri A, Celotti G, Landi E, Sandri M, Roveri N, Falini G. Biologically inspired synthesis of bone-like composite: self-assembled collagen fibers/hydroxyapatite nanocrystals. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67:618–625. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LA, Ma PX. Nano-fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004;39:125–131. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich M, Grayson WL, Wan LQ, Marolt D, Drobnic M, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Tissue engineered bone grafts: biological requirements, tissue culture and clinical relevance. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2008;3:254–264. doi:10.2174/157488808786733962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim Lopes JC, Salviano SH, Antunes Barreto Lins C, Devita RL. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of a nanobiomaterial in a maxillary sinus lift surgery: a case report. Br J Med Health Res. 2020;7(07):13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhao M, Lu J, Ma J, Wei J, Wei S. Cell responses to two kinds of nanohydroxyapatite with different sizes and crystallinities. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:1239–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohori F, Kitaura H, Marahleh A, et al. Effect of TNF-α-induced sclerostin on osteocytes during orthodontic tooth movement. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:e9716758. doi:10.1155/2019/9716758
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Przekora A, Ginalska G. In vitro evaluation of the risk of inflammatory response after chitosan/HA and chitosan/β-1,3-glucan/HA bone scaffold implantation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;61:355–361. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Götz W, Gerber T, Michel B, Lossdörfer S, Henkel KO, Heinemann F. Immunohistochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel (NanoBone(r)) osteogenesis: a study on biopsies from human jaws. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1016–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen SS, Yeo A, Dard M, Hunziker E, Schenk R, Buser D. Evaluation of a novel biphasic calcium phosphate in standardized bone defects: a histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:752–760. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01417.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanaati S, Barbeck M, Detsch R, et al. The chemical composition of synthetic bone substitutes influences tissue reactions in vivo: histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the cellular inflammatory response to hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics. Biomed Mater. 2012;7:e015005. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/7/1/015005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denry I, Kuhn LT. Design and characterization of calcium phosphate ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater. 2016;32:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen Y, Zhu X, et al. Effect of phase composition on protein adsorption and osteoinduction of porous calcium phosphate ceramics in mice. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:4234–4243. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang D, Tare RS, Yang LY, Williams DF, Ou KL, Oreffo RO. Biofabrication of bone tissue: approaches, challenges and translation for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2016;83:363–382. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva Brum I, Frigo L, Lana devita R, da Silva Pires JL. Histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural characterization of a nano-hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate composite and a bone xenograft in sub-critical size bone defect in rat calvaria. Materials. 2020;13:4598. doi:10.3390/ma13204598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michiel Croes F, Oner C, Kruyt MC. Proinflammatory mediators enhance the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells after lineage commitment. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132781
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maruyama M, Rhee C, Utsunomiya T, Zhang N, Ueno M. Modulation of the inflammatory response and bone healing. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:386. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(11):696–711. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00279-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar