References
- Frantz S, Hundertmark MJ, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(27):2549–2561. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac223
- Caccioppo A, Franchin L, Grosso A, et al. Ischemia reperfusion injury: mechanisms of damage/protection and novel strategies for cardiac recovery/regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):5024. doi:10.3390/ijms20205024
- Algoet M, Janssens S, Himmelreich U, et al. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and the influence of inflammation. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2023;33(6):357–366. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2022.02.005
- Zhao T, Wu W, Sui L, et al. Reactive oxygen species-based nanomaterials for the treatment of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injuries. Bioact Mater. 2022;7:47–72. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.006
- Reiter RJ, Mayo JC, Tan DX, et al. Melatonin as an antioxidant: under promises but over delivers. J Pineal Res. 2016;61(3):253–278. doi:10.1111/jpi.12360
- Ma W, Wei S, Zhang B, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cardiomyocyte death in drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:434. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00434
- Liu X, Zhang Y, Hong L, et al. Gallic acid increases atrial natriuretic peptide secretion and mechanical dynamics through activation of PKC. Life Sci. 2017;181:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2017.05.024
- Zhang S, Luo Y, Zeng H, et al. Encapsulation of selenium in chitosan nanoparticles improves selenium availability and protects cells from selenium-induced DNA damage response. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22(12):1137–1142. doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.09.014
- Bheri S, Davis ME. Nanoparticle-hydrogel system for post-myocardial infarction delivery of MicroRNA. ACS Nano. 2019;13(9):9702–9706. doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b05716
- Wang RM, Christman KL. Decellularized myocardial matrix hydrogels: in basic research and preclinical studies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;96:77–82. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.06.002
- Li L, Wang Y, Guo R, et al. Ginsenoside Rg3-loaded, reactive oxygen species-responsive polymeric nanoparticles for alleviating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Control Release. 2020;317:259–272. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.11.032
- Bae S, Park M, Kang C, et al. Hydrogen peroxide-responsive nanoparticle reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(11). doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003697
- Baino F, Hamzehlou S, Kargozar S. Bioactive glasses: where are we and where are we going. J Funct Biomater. 2018;9(1):25. doi:10.3390/jfb9010025
- Perić KŽ, Rider P, Alkildani S, et al. An introduction to bone tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs. 2020;43(2):69–86. doi:10.1177/0391398819876286
- Kargozar S, Montazerian M, Hamzehlou S, et al. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: promising platforms for antibacterial strategies. Acta Biomater. 2018;81:1–19. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.052
- Vargas GE, Haro Durand LA, Cadena V, et al. Effect of nano-sized bioactive glass particles on the angiogenic properties of collagen based composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24(5):1261–1269. doi:10.1007/s10856-013-4892-7
- Lukowiak A, Lao J, Lacroix J, et al. Bioactive glass nanoparticles obtained through sol-gel chemistry. Chem Commun. 2013;49(59):6620–6622. doi:10.1039/c3cc00003f
- Ren G, Li K, Hu Y, et al. Optimization of selenizing conditions for Seleno-Lentinan and its characteristics. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;81:249–258. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.08.012
- Shi M, Cao X, Zhuang J, et al. The cardioprotective effect and mechanism of bioactive glass on myocardial reperfusion injury. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(4):045044. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/ac067e
- Zheng K, Kang J, Rutkowski B, et al. Toward highly dispersed mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles with high Cu concentration using Cu/Ascorbic acid complex as precursor. Front Chem. 2019;7:497. doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00497
- Wang D, Yao Y, He J, et al. Engineered cell-derived microparticles Bi2Se3/DOX@MPs for imaging guided synergistic photothermal/low-dose chemotherapy of cancer. Adv Sci. 2020;7(3):1901293. doi:10.1002/advs.201901293
- Yoshizawa S, Brown A, Barchowsky A, et al. Magnesium ion stimulation of bone marrow stromal cells enhances osteogenic activity, simulating the effect of magnesium alloy degradation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(6):2834–2842. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.002
- Vannella KM, Wynn TA. Mechanisms of organ injury and repair by macrophages. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79(1):593–617. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034356
- Sun K, Li -Y-Y, Jin J. A double-edged sword of immuno-microenvironment in cardiac homeostasis and injury repair. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):79. doi:10.1038/s41392-020-00455-6
- Pei J, Cai L, Wang F, et al. LPA2 contributes to vascular endothelium homeostasis and cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2022;131(5):388–403. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321036
- Ding Z, Cheng W, Liu L, et al. Nanosized silk-magnesium complexes for tissue regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(26):e2300887. doi:10.1002/adhm.202300887
- Leem YH, Lee KS, Kim JH, et al. Magnesium ions facilitate integrin alpha 2- and alpha 3-mediated proliferation and enhance alkaline phosphatase expression and activity in hBMSCs. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(10):E527–E536. doi:10.1002/term.1861
- Cochain C, Channon KM, Silvestre JS. Angiogenesis in the infarcted myocardium. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18(9):1100–1113. doi:10.1089/ars.2012.4849
- Hu M, Fang J, Zhang Y, et al. Design and evaluation a kind of functional biomaterial for bone tissue engineering: selenium/mesoporous bioactive glass nanospheres. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;579:654–666. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2020.06.122
- Abdelwahed A, Bouhlel I, Skandrani I, et al. Study of antimutagenic and antioxidant activities of gallic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-pentagalloylglucose from Pistacia lentiscus. Confirmation by microarray expression profiling. Chem Biol Interact. 2007;165(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2006.10.003
- Zhang W, Zeng QM, Tang RC. Gallic acid functionalized polylysine for endowing cotton fiber with antibacterial, antioxidant, and drug delivery properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;216:65–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac
- Bhattacharyya S, Ahammed SM, Saha BP, et al. The gallic acid-phospholipid complex improved the antioxidant potential of gallic acid by enhancing its bioavailability. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2013;14(3):1025–1033. doi:10.1208/s12249-013-9991-8
- de Cristo Soares Alves A, Mainardes RM, Khalil NM. Nanoencapsulation of gallic acid and evaluation of its cytotoxicity and antioxidant activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;60:126–134. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.014
- Kaparekar PS, Pathmanapan S, Anandasadagopan SK. Polymeric scaffold of Gallic acid loaded chitosan nanoparticles infused with collagen-fibrin for wound dressing application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;165(Pt A):930–947. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.09.212
- Ahangarpour A, Sharifinasab H, Kalantari H, et al. Gallic acid and gallic acid nanoparticle modulate insulin secretion pancreatic β-islets against silica nanoparticle-induced oxidative damage. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022;200(12):5159–5171. doi:10.1007/s12011-022-03111-y
- Ma J, Zhao N, Zhu D. Biphasic responses of human vascular smooth muscle cells to magnesium ion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(2):347–356. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35570
- Wang J, Xu J, Song B, et al. Magnesium (Mg) based interference screws developed for promoting tendon graft incorporation in bone tunnel in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2017;63:393–410. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.018
- Yuan Z, Wan Z, Gao C, et al. Controlled magnesium ion delivery system for in situ bone tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2022;350:360–376. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.08.036
- Mazur A, Maier JA, Rock E, et al. Magnesium and the inflammatory response: potential physiopathological implications. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;458(1):48–56. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2006.03.031
- Knipper JA, Willenborg S, Brinckmann J, et al. Interleukin-4 receptor α signaling in myeloid cells controls collagen fibril assembly in skin repair. Immunity. 2015;43(4):803–816. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.09.005
- Gieseck RL, Ramalingam TR, Hart KM, et al. Interleukin-13 activates distinct cellular pathways leading to ductular reaction, steatosis, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;45(1):145–158. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.06.009
- Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450–462. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015
- Gieseck RL, Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Type 2 immunity in tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(1):62–76. doi:10.1038/nri.2017.90
- Sadtler K, Estrellas K, Allen BW, et al. Developing a pro-regenerative biomaterial scaffold microenvironment requires T helper 2 cells. Science. 2016;352(6283):366–370. doi:10.1126/science.aad9272
- Costantino MD, Schuster A, Helmholz H, et al. Inflammatory response to magnesium-based biodegradable implant materials. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:598–608. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.014
- Nielsen FH. Magnesium deficiency and increased inflammation: current perspectives. J Inflamm Res. 2018;11:25–34. doi:10.2147/JIR.S136742
- Chouchani ET, Pell VR, Gaude E, et al. Ischaemic accumulation of succinate controls reperfusion injury through mitochondrial ROS. Nature. 2014;515(7527):431–435. doi:10.1038/nature13909
- Piard C, Jeyaram A, Liu Y, et al. 3D printed HUVECs/MSCs cocultures impact cellular interactions and angiogenesis depending on cell-cell distance. Biomaterials. 2019;222:119423. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119423
- Sack MN, Fyhrquist FY, Saijonmaa OJ, et al. Basic biology of oxidative stress and the cardiovascular system: part 1 of a 3-part series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(2):196–211. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.034