A Retrospective Review of Decision to Delivery Time Interval for Foetal Distress at a Central Hospital

References

• Leveno K, Bloom S, Dashe J, Hoffman B, Casey B, Spong C. William Obstetrics: Study Guide. 24th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow JA, Kinsella SM. Intrauterine resuscitation: active management of fetal distress. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2002;11(2):105–116. doi:10.1054/ijoa.2001.0933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eunson P. The long-term health, social, and financial burden of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(3):48–50. doi:10.1111/dmcn.12727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharmaratnam S. Fetal distress. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(1):155–172. doi:10.1053/beog.1999.0069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afolabi BB, Lesi F. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(10):2–65. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heazell A. Reduced fetal movements. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):2011–2012. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-S1-A10
   Google Scholar
• Ajah LO, Ibekwe PC, Onu FA, Onwe OE, Ezeonu TC, Omeje I. Evaluation of clinical diagnosis of fetal distress and perinatal outcome in a low resource Nigerian setting. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(4):8–11. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17274.7687
   Google Scholar
• Jenniskens K, Janssen PA. Newborn outcomes in British Columbia after caesarean section for non-reassuring fetal status. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(3):207–213. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30306-6
   Google Scholar
• Gravett C, Eckert LO, Gravett MG, et al. Non-reassuring fetal status: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine X. 2016;34(49):6084–6092. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.043
   Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D. Obstetric Emergencies: A Practical Guide. Porto, Portugal: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Erol SA, Tanacan A, Altinboga O, Ozturk FH, Ozgu BS, Tasci Y. Evaluation of fetal serum thiol/disulfide homeostasis and ischemia-modified albumin levels in fetal distress. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2022;41(3):426–435. doi:10.1080/15513815.2020.1831662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney G, Sellers S, Flavell V, Squier M, Johnson A. Case-control study of intrapartum care, cerebral palsy, and perinatal death. Br Med J. 1994;308(6931):743–750. doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6931.743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edipoglu IS, Celik F, Marangoz EC, Orcan GH, Staffieri F. Effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean section for foetal distress. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes NL, Dyer RA. Anesthesia for urgent cesarean section. Clin Perinatol. 2019;46(4):785–799. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afolayan JM, Olajumoke TO, Esangbedo SE, Edomwonyi NP. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in pregnant women with fetal distress: time for reappraisal. Int J Biomed Sci. 2014;10(2):103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Classification of urgency of caesarean section: a continuum of risk (Good Practice No 11); 2010. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelinesgoodpractice11classificationofurgencpdf. Accessed June 29, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Caesarean section: clinical guideline(CG132); 2011. Available from: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg132. Accessed May 24, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and The Royal College of Midwives. Caesarean section: NICE clinical guideline (NG137); 2011. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng137. Accessed May 29, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Leung TY, Lao TT. Timing of caesarean section according to urgency. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):251–267. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D. Caesarean section for fetal distress: the 30 minute yardstick is in danger of becoming a rod for our backs. Br Med J. 2001;322(8718):1316–1317. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)93291-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Naithani U, Madhanmohan C, Singh A, Reddy P, Gupta A. Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: a 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017;33(1):64–70. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.202197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson GA, Kelly B, Russell R, Dutton S, Kurinczuk JJ, MacKenzie IZ. Target decision to delivery intervals for emergency caesarean section based on neonatal outcomes and three year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):276–281. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khemworapong K, Sompagdee N, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(1):48–55. doi:10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirani BA, Mchome BL, Mazuguni NS, Mahande MJ. The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1608-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan S, Megann E, Scott J, Scardo J, Hendrix N, Martin J. Cesarean delivery for fetal distress: rate and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58(5):337–350. doi:10.1097/01.OGX.0000066802.19138.AE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andisha E, Cronje L. Evaluating the decision-to-delivery interval in category 1 emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary referral hospital. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;25(3):95–99. doi:10.7196/sajog.1510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan P, Tang F, Sun G, Ren W. Prediction of emergency cesarean section by measurable maternal and fetal characteristics. J Investig Med. 2020;68(3):799–806. doi:10.1136/jim-2019-001175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu K, Cortier H, Maldonado F, Mashant T, Ford N, Trelles M. Cesarean section rates and indications in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country study from Medecins Sans Frontieres. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):5–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer PJ. Has electronic fetal heart rate monitoring made a difference? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;13(1):2–7. doi:10.1016/j.siny.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboulghar W, Ibrahim M, Allam I, Hosny W, Otify M. Validity of cardiotocography in the diagnosis of acute fetal hypoxia in low resources settings. Internet J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;17(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell SC, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Bannerman CG. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-tier fetal heart rate interpretation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(4):378.e1–378.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santo S, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, et al. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(2):166–175. doi:10.1111/aogs.13064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson P, Norén H, Carlsson A. New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(2):219–228. doi:10.1111/aogs.13277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam Y, Mwinyoglee J, Masuku B, Nicolaou E. An evaluation of the indications for caesarean sections at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;24(1):11–14. doi:10.7196/SAJOG.2018.v24i1.1226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Pardeshi S, Mayadeo N, Mane J. Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(4):251–254. doi:10.1007/s13224-013-0491-2
   Google Scholar
• Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29–38. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrou EP, Ford JB, Shand AW, Morris JM, Roberts CL. Epidemiology and trends for caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(8):1–7. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson ten group classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1422–1427. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnikrishnan B, Rakshith Prasad B, Amarnath A, et al. Trends and indications for caesarean section in a tertiary care obstetric hospital in coastal south India. Australas Med J. 2010;3(12):821–825. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2010.465
   Google Scholar
• Asher E, Dvir S, Seidman DS, Greenberg-Dotan S, Kedem A, Sheizaf B. Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynecologists in tertiary hospitals. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):1–5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkoff H. Fear of litigation and cesarean section rates. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(5):390–394. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatara U. Rising rates of caesarean section: an indicator of defensive medicine practiced by obstetricians. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(6):2371–2376. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182352
   Google Scholar
• Wong TCT, Lau CQH, Tan EL, Kanagalingam D. Decision-to-delivery intervals and total duration of surgery for caesarean sections in a tertiary general hospital. Singapore Med J. 2017;58(6):332–337. doi:10.11622/smedj.2016098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan G, Yadav G, Vaid N, Ali H. Factors affecting “decision to delivery interval” in emergency caesarean sections in a tertiary care hospital: a cross sectional observational study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):651–656. doi:10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20131231
   Google Scholar
• Bruce D, Stone S, Harding K. Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections: completion of the audit cycle in a central London teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22(3):273–278. doi:10.1080/01443610220130553
   Google Scholar
• Nageotte MP, Van der Wal B. Achievement of the 30-minute standard in obstetrics: can it be done? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):104–107. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie IZ, Cooke I. Prospective 12 month study of 30 minute decision to delivery intervals for “emergency” caesarean section. Br Med J. 2001;322(7298):1334–1335. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore LJ, Cochrane RM. Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1000 emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(4):307–310. doi:10.1080/01443610600594898
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I. What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG. 2002;109(5):498–504. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01323.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target? BJOG. 2002;109(5):505–508. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J, Loughney AD. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:1–6. doi:10.1155/2011/640379
   Google Scholar
• Onah HE, Ibeziako N, Umezulike AC, Effetie ER, Ogbuokiri CM. Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(4):342–346. doi:10.1080/01443610500119671
   Google Scholar
• Le Riche H, Hall DR. Non-elective caesarean section: how long do we take to deliver? J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51(2):78–81. doi:10.1093/tropej/fmh082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000;93(7):346–350. doi:10.1177/014107680009300703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TY, Chung PW, Rogers MS, Sahota DS, Lao TT-H, Chung TKH. Urgent cesarean delivery for fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(4):1023–1028. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d67ebc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayani SI, Walkinshaw SA, Preston C. Pregnancy outcome in severe placental abruption. BJOG. 2003;110(7):679–683. doi:10.1016/S1470-0328(03)02988-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbay-Benziv R, Ashwal E, Lahav-Ezra H, et al. Decision-to delivery interval in suspected placental abruption: association with pregnancy outcome. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2013;27:1–4. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.871703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn CN, Zhang Q, Sia JT, Assam PN, Tagore S, Sng BL. Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: a retrospective cohort study. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(8):546–551. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.187782
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hillemanns P, Strauss A, Hasbargen U, et al. Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on apgar and umbilical artery pH. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;273(3):161–165. doi:10.1007/s00404-005-0045-7
   Google Scholar
• Heller G, Bauer E, Schill S, et al. Decision-to-delivery time and perinatal complications in emergency cesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(35–36):589–596. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2017.0589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy KK, Baruah J, Kumar S, Deorari AK, Sharma JB, Karmakar D. Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(12):1249–1252. doi:10.1007/s12098-008-0245-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, et al. The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):224.e1–224.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finster M, Wood M, Raja S. The apgar score has survived the test of time. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(4):855–857. doi:10.1097/00000542-200504000-00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar