Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences from the Providers’ Perspective: Is It Feasible in Routine Cancer Care?

References

• Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(11):935–943. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70940-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini KS, Taylor C, Ramirez A-J, et al. Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(4):853–859. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340(mar23 2):c951. doi:10.1136/bmj.c951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Lamb BW, Arora S, Darzi A, Sevdalis N, Green JS. Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:49–61. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S117945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raine R, Wallace I, Nic A’ Bhaird C, et al. Improving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational study. Health Ser Deliv Res. 2014;37(2). doi:10.3310/hsdr02370
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Action Team. The Characteristics of an Effective Multidisciplinary Team (MDT). London; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management. Cancer. 2001;91(7):1231–1237. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010401)91:7<1231:AID-CNCR1123>3.0.CO;2-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianfrocca ME, Shelby M, Birdi S, et al. A multidisciplinary team approach to efficient breast cancer diagnosis. JCO. 2016;34(7_suppl):88. doi:10.1200/jco.2016.34.7_suppl.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosell L, Wihl J, Nilbert M, Malmström M. Health professionals’ views on key enabling factors and barriers of national multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care: a qualitative study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:179–186. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S240140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salloch S, Ritter P, Wascher S, Vollmann J, Schildmann J. Medical expertise and patient involvement: a multiperspective qualitative observation study of the patient’s role in oncological decision making. Oncologist. 2014;19(6):654–660. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Action Team. Multidisciplinary Team Members’ Views About MDT Working: Results from a Survey Commissioned by the National Cancer Action Team. London; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison JD, Choy ET, Spillane A, Butow P, Young JM, Evans A. Australian breast cancer specialists’ involvement in multidisciplinary treatment planning meetings. Breast. 2008;17(4):335–340. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2008.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM, Dixon JM. Surgeons’ views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(7):905–908. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt B, Philip J, McLachlan S-A. Team dynamics, decision making, and attitudes toward multidisciplinary cancer meetings: health professionals’ perspectives. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(6):e17–20. doi:10.1200/JOP.2010.000023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croke JM, El-Sayed S. Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature. Curr Oncol. 2012;19(4):232–238. doi:10.3747/co.19.944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL, Elwyn G, Epstein RM. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):167–180. doi:10.1586/erp.12.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong NJL, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF. Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(2):125–134. doi:10.1002/jso.21589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, Burns HJG, Morrison DS. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. BMJ. 2012;344(apr26 1):e2718. doi:10.1136/bmj.e2718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb BW, Jalil RT, Shah S, et al. Cancer patients’ perspectives on multidisciplinary team working: an exploratory focus group study. Urol Nurs. 2014;34(2):83–91. doi:10.7257/1053-816X.2014.34.2.83
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Finnegan-John J, Green JSA. “No decision about me without me” in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:488. doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0488-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton DW, Heaven B, Thomson RG, Wilson JA, Exley C. Multidisciplinary team decision-making in cancer and the absent patient: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e012559. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlweg P, Hoffmann J, Harter M, Frosch DL, Elwyn G, Scholl I. In absentia: an exploratory study of how patients are considered in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139921. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollunder S, Herrlinger U, Zipfel M, et al. Cross-sectional increase of adherence to multidisciplinary tumor board decisions. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):936. doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4841-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan S, Foreman J, Wallis MG, Caldas C, Britton P. Multidisciplinary decisions in breast cancer: does the patient receive what the team has recommended? Br J Cancer. 2013;108(12):2442–2447. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morement H, Harrison R, Taylor-Robinson SD. The multidisciplinary team meeting in the UK from the patients’ perspective: comments and observations from cholangiocarcinoma patients and their families. Int J Gen Med. 2017;10:305–310. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S145029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoinville L, Taylor C, Zasada M, Warner R, Pottle E, Green J. Improving the effectiveness of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: analysis of a national survey of MDT members’ opinions about streamlining patient discussions. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000631. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000631
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamb BW, Taylor C, Lamb JN, et al. Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1408–1416. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2676-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate J, Wingrove J, Donkin A, Taylor R, Whelan J. Patient perspectives on a national multidisciplinary team meeting for a rare cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019;28(2):e12971. doi:10.1111/ecc.12971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Cancer Aid. Interdisciplinary S3-Guideline for Diagnostic, Therapy, and Rehabilitation of Breast Cancer: [Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie Für Die Diagnostik, Therapie Und Nachsorge Des Mammakarzinoms]. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ärztekammer W-L. Certification of breast cancer centers in North-Rhine Westphalia. Requirement catalogue breast cancer centers: [Verfahren zur Zertifizierung von Brustzentren in NRW. Anforderungskatalog-Brustzentren]. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser C, Diekmann A, Kowalski C, et al. Health literacy and patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast cancer care: a multilevel modeling approach. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):330. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5546-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Heuser C, Ernstmann N, et al. How do breast cancer patients experience multidisciplinary tumor conferences? - a description from the patient perspective. Breast. 2019;44:66–72. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansmann L, Kowalski C, Pfaff H, Wuerstlein R, Wirtz MA, Ernstmann N. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences. Breast. 2014;23(6):865–869. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy ET, Chiu A, Butow P, Young J, Spillane A. A pilot study to evaluate the impact of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Breast. 2007;16(2):178–189. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2006.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butow P, Harrison JD, Choy ET, Young JM, Spillane A, Evans A. Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Cancer. 2007;110(9):1937–1944. doi:10.1002/cncr.23007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoubre J, Lapeyre M, Pastourel R, et al. Will the presence of the patient at multidisciplinary meetings influence the decision in head and neck oncology management? Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(2):185–189. doi:10.1080/00016489.2017.1384059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen JJJ, Habets IGJ, Beurskens A, van Bokhoven MA. Successful participation of patients in interprofessional team meetings: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2017;20(4):724–733. doi:10.1111/hex.12511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen JJJ, de Wit M, Smeets HWH, Stoffers E, van Bokhoven MA, Daniëls R. “They are talking about me, but not with me”: a focus group study to explore the patient perspective on interprofessional team meetings in primary care. Patient. 2017;10(4):429–438. doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0214-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C. A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psychooncology. 2005;14(10):801–809. doi:10.1002/pon.950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser C, Diekmann A, Ernstmann N, Ansmann L. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumour conferences in breast cancer care (PINTU): a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e024621. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(1):44–53. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radecki SE, Nyquist JG, Gates JD, Abrahamson S, Henson DE. Educational characteristics of tumor conferences in teaching and non‐teaching hospitals. J Cancer Educ. 2009;9(4):204–216.
   Google Scholar
• Flick U, Kvale S, Angrosino MV, et al. eds. The Sage Qualitative Research Kit. London: SAGE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz U. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. 4 ed. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckarzt U. Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video. [Place of Publication Not Identified]. SPRINGER; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Lamb BW, Sarkar S, et al. Predictors of treatment decisions in multidisciplinary oncology meetings: a quantitative observational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(13):4410–4417. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5347-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Atkins L, Richardson A, Tarrant R, Ramirez A-J. Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):202. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlweg P, Didi S, Kriston L, Härter M, Nestoriuc Y, Scholl I. Process quality of decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a structured observational study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):772. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3768-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien MA, Ellis PM, Whelan TJ, et al. Physician-related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer: perspectives of physicians and patients. Health Expect. 2013;16(4):373–384. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00712.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Heuser C, Schellenberger B, et al. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: providers’ perceptions of patients’ need satisfaction and emotional experiences. Psychooncology. 2020;29(8):1263–1271. doi:10.1002/pon.5413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassalle R, Marold J, Schöbel M, et al. Entscheidungsprozesse im Tumorboard bei eingeschränkter Evidenzlage. Laryngorhinootologie. [ Decision process in a multidisciplinary cancer team with limited evidence]. 2014;93(4):237–243. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1353199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Murtagh G, Lamb BW, Green J, Sevdalis N. How Multidisciplinary are Multidisciplinary Case Reviews in Cancer Care? Analysis of Team Decision-Making Fidelity. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Horlait M, Baes S, Dhaene S, van Belle S, Leys M. How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:159–167. doi:10.2147/jmdh.s196660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offermanns G, Koldžić E, Schweiger A. Qualitätsentwicklung in der onkologischen Versorgung durch multiprofessionelle Teamarbeit am Beispiel von Tumorboards: ein Überblick. Public Health Forum. 2019;27(3):205–207. doi:10.1515/pubhef-2019-0050
   Google Scholar
• Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, Vincent C, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2116–2125. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1675-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans L, Donovan B, Liu Y, Shaw T, Harnett P. A tool to improve the performance of multidisciplinary teams in cancer care. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000435. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houssami N, Sainsbury R. Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(15):2480–2491. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohmeier B, Schellenberger B, Diekmann A, Ernstmann N, Ansmann L, Heuser C. Opportunities and limitations of shared decision making in multidisciplinary tumor conferences with patient participation - a qualitative interview study with providers. Patient Educ Couns. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar