“Finding Common Ground” – Impact of a Complex Intervention on Collaboration in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Care of People without Natural Speech

References

• Currie G, Szabo J. “It is like a jungle gym, and everything is under construction”: the parent’s perspective of caring for a child with a rare disease. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(1):96–103. doi:10.1111/cch.12628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirau-Rosaly W, Brown SP, Wood EA, Rockich-Winston N. Integrating an interprofessional geriatric active learning workshop into undergraduate medical curriculum. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:1–6. doi:10.1177/2382120520923680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakitzidis G, Timmermans O, Callewaert N, et al. Outcome indicators on interprofessional collaboration interventions for elderly. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(2):1–17. doi:10.5334/ijic.2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty M, Pierson R, Applebaum S. New 2011 survey of patients with complex care needs in eleven countries finds that care is often poorly coordinated. Health Aff. 2011;30(12):2437–2448. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves S, Lewin S, Espin S, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang K, Johnston M, Tulsky D, Wood K, Dyson-Hudson T, Komaroff E. Access and coordination of health care service for people with disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2009;20(1):28–34. doi:10.1177/1044207308315564
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Fager S, Ball L, Dietz A. AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: a review. Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(3):230–242. doi:10.1080/07434610701553668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: past, present, and future challenges. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28(4):197–204. doi:10.1177/1044207308315564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo F, Blackstone SW, Canchola J, Roman-Lantzy C. Working with children with cortical visual impairment who use augmentative and alternative communication: implications for improving current practice. Augment Altern Commun. 2022;1–15. doi:10.1080/07434618.2022.2085622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md.: Paul H. Brookes; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Creer S, Enderby P, Judge S, John A. Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: determining the need. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;51(6):639–653. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding C, Lindsay G, O’Brien A, Dipper L, Wright J. Implementing AAC with children with profound and multiple learning disabilities: a study in rationale underpinning intervention. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2011;11(2):120–129. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01184.x
   Google Scholar
• Baxter S, Enderby P, Evans P, Judge S. Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(2):115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J, Drasgow E. Conditional use of aided and unaided AAC. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2001;16(3):152–161. doi:10.1177/108835760101600303
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Madel M. Eye tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of displays for augmentative and alternative communication influence visual search in individuals with down syndrome or autism spectrum disorder. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(4):1649–1658. doi:10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Quach W, Lund SK, McKelvey M. AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: the impact of experience. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28:3. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.704521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D, Light J, Beukelman DR, Klein C, Nieder D, Nazareth G. Building capacity in AAC: a person-centred approach to supporting participation by people with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):56–68. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1556731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C, Ball L, Dietz A, et al. Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28(4):278–288. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.716079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subihi AS. Saudi special education student teachers’ knowledge of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Int J Spec Educ. 2013;28(3):93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Waller A. Public policy issues in augmentative and alternative communication technologies a comparison of the U.K. and the U.S. Interactions. 2013;20(3):68. doi:10.1145/2451856.2451872
   Google Scholar
• Hunt P, Soto G, Maier J, Müller E, Goetz L. Collaborative teaming to support students with augmentative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augment Altern Commun. 2002;18(1):20–35. doi:10.1080/714868359
   Google Scholar
• Uthoff SAK, Zinkevich A, Boenisch J, Sachse SK, Bernasconi T, Ansmann L. Collaboration between stakeholders involved in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) care of people without natural speech. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(6):821–831. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1860918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston SS, Blue CW, Stegenga SM. AAC barriers and facilitators for children with Koolen de Vries syndrome and childhood apraxia of speech: parent perceptions. Augment Altern Commun. 2022;1–13. doi:10.1080/07434618.2022.2085626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung Y-C, Stoner JB. A meta-synthesis of team members’ voices: what we need and what we do to support students who use AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(3):175–186. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1213766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray J, Lynch Y, Meredith S, et al. Professionals’ decision-making in recommending communication aids in the UK: competing considerations. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(3):167–179. doi:10.1080/07434618.2019.1597384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner JB, Angell ME, Bailey RL. Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive educational settings: a case study. Augment Altern Commun. 2010;26(2):122–135. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alant E, Champion A, Peabody EC. Exploring interagency collaboration in AAC intervention. Commun Disord Q. 2013;34(3):172–183. doi:10.1177/1525740112455432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass MR, Meadan H. A boy and his AAC team: building instructional competence across team members. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;34(3):167–179. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1491059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkevich A, Uthoff SAK, Boenisch J, Sachse SK, Bernasconi T, Ansmann L. Complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) care in Germany: a study protocol of an evaluation study with a controlled mixed-methods design. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e029469. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman E, Kuniavsky M, Moed A. Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum TL. The Handbook for Focus Group Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):229–238. doi:10.1023/A:1023254226592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.: A Wiley-Interscience Publication. New York: Wiley; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz U. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative Content Analysis: Methods, Practice, Software Support]. 3rd ed. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Moorcroft A, Scarinci N, Meyer C. ‘We were just kind of handed it and then it was smoke bombed by everyone’: how do external stakeholders contribute to parent rejection and the abandonment of AAC systems? Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020;55(1):59–69. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorcroft A, Scarinci N, Meyer C. Speech pathologist perspectives on the acceptance versus rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for children with complex communication needs. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(3):3. doi:10.1080/07434618.2019.1609577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkevich A, Lubasch JS, Uthoff SAK, et al. Caregiver burden and proxy-reported outcomes of people without natural speech: a cross-sectional survey study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e048789. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giel B, Liehs A. “Moderierte Runde Tische” (MoRTi) in der Inklusion [“Moderated round tables” (MoRTi) in inclusive education]. Sprachtherapie aktuell. 2016;3(1):Articlee2016–04. doi:10.14620/stadbs160904
   Google Scholar
• Shin D, Song J, Song S, Park J, Lee J, Jun S. TalkingBoogie: collaborative mobile AAC system for non-verbal children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2020 Apr 25–30; Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020: 1–13. DOI:10.1145/3313831.3376154.
   Google Scholar