Shared-Decision-Making Experiences in Breast Cancer Care with and without Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences: A Mixed-Methods-Study

References

• Stewart M. Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. Thousand Oaks Calif. u.a.: SAGE Publ; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J. An integrative model of patient-centeredness - a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–1528. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finset A. Research on person-centred clinical care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):384–386. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01608.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995;152(9):1423–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):600–607. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hessam S, Hamzehgardeshi Z. Patient involvement in health care decision making: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(1):e12454. doi:10.5812/ircmj.12454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz B. Interdisciplinary breast cancer care: declaring and improving the standard. Oncology. 2004;18(10):1263–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch L, Bertram H, Eberle A, et al. Fear of recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors-still an issue. Results on prevalence, determinants, and the association with quality of life and depression from the cancer survivorship--a multi-regional population-based study. Psycho-oncology. 2014;23(5):547–554. doi:10.1002/pon.3452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izci F, Sarsanov D, Erdogan Zİ, et al. Impact of Personality Traits, Anxiety, Depression and Hopelessness Levels on Quality of Life in the Patients with Breast Cancer. Eur J Breast Health. 2018;14(2):105–111. doi:10.5152/ejbh.2018.3724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmo. Guidelines. Available from: Available from: https://www.esmo.org/guidelines. Accessed July 19, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• ASCO. Guidelines, Tools, & Resources. Available from: https://www.asco.org/research-guidelines/quality-guidelines/guidelines. Accessed July 19, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie [Guideline program oncology]. Leitlinien. Available from: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/. Accessed July 19, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Lamb BW, Arora S, Darzi A, Sevdalis N, Green JS. Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018;11:49–61. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S117945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Murtagh G, Lamb BW, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Degrees of Multidisciplinarity Underpinning Care Planning for Patients with Cancer in Weekly Multidisciplinary Team Meetings: conversation Analysis. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:411–424. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S270394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlait M, Baes S, Dhaene S, van Belle S, Leys M. How multidisciplinary are multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care? An observational study in oncology departments in Flanders, Belgium. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:159–167. doi:10.2147/jmdh.s196660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951. doi:10.1136/bmj.c951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoinville L, Taylor C, Zasada M, Warner R, Pottle E, Green J. Improving the effectiveness of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: analysis of a national survey of MDT members’ opinions about streamlining patient discussions. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000631. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000631
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houssami N, Sainsbury R. Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(15):2480–2491. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.05.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarini A, Garbarino GM, Orlandi P, et al. From “Cure” to “Care”: the Role of the MultiDisciplinary Team on Colorectal Cancer Patients’ Satisfaction and Oncological Outcomes. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:1415–1426. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S362550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler M, Schildmann J, Trautmann F, et al. Cancer patients’ control preferences in decision making and associations with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study in an outpatient cancer center. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(9):2753–2760. doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3686-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL, Elwyn G, Epstein RM. Patient preferences and healthcare outcomes: an ecological perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(2):167–180. doi:10.1586/erp.12.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb BW, Taylor C, Lamb JN, et al. Facilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(5):1408–1416. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2676-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Finnegan-John J, Green JSA. ”No decision about me without me” in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:488. doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0488-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Sevdalis N, Green JSA, Lamb BW, Chapman C, Skolarus TA. Making Tumor Boards More Patient-Centered: let’s Start With the Name. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;OP2000588. doi:10.1200/OP.20.00588
   Google Scholar
• Hahlweg P, Hoffmann J, Harter M, Frosch DL, Elwyn G, Scholl I. In Absentia: an Exploratory Study of How Patients Are Considered in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139921. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerts PAF, van der Weijden T, Savelberg W, et al. The Next Step Toward Patient-Centeredness in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings: an Interview Study with Professionals. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1311–1324. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S286044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wihl J, Rosell L, Frederiksen K, Kinhult S, Lindell G, Nilbert M. Contributions to Multidisciplinary Team Meetings in Cancer Care: predictors of Complete Case Information and Comprehensive Case Discussions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2445–2452. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S309162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy ET, Chiu A, Butow P, Young J, Spillane A. A pilot study to evaluate the impact of involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Breast. 2007;16(2):178–189. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2006.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butow P, Harrison JD, Choy ET, Young JM, Spillane A, Evans A. Health professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment plan. Cancer. 2007;110(9):1937–1944. doi:10.1002/cncr.23007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JD, Choy ET, Spillane A, Butow P, Young JM, Evans A. Australian breast cancer specialists’ involvement in multidisciplinary treatment planning meetings. The Breast. 2008;17(4):335–340. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2008.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoubre J, Lapeyre M, Pastourel R, et al. Will the presence of the patient at multidisciplinary meetings influence the decision in head and neck oncology management? Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(2):185–189. doi:10.1080/00016489.2017.1384059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansmann L, Kowalski C, Pfaff H, Wuerstlein R, Wirtz MA, Ernstmann N. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences. Breast. 2014;23(6):865–869. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser C, Diekmann A, Kowalski C, et al. Health literacy and patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast cancer care: a multilevel modeling approach. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):330. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5546-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Heuser C, Ernstmann N, et al. How do breast cancer patients experience multidisciplinary tumor conferences? - A description from the patient perspective. Breast. 2019;44:66–72. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansmann L, Heuser C, Diekmann A, et al. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: how is it implemented? What is the patients’ role? What are patients’ experiences? Cancer Med. 2021;10(19):6714–6724. doi:10.1002/cam4.4213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohmeier B, Schellenberger B, Diekmann A, Ernstmann N, Ansmann L, Heuser C. Opportunities and limitations of shared decision making in multidisciplinary tumor conferences with patient participation - A qualitative interview study with providers. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;104(4):792–799. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberger B, Diekmann A, Heuser C, Gambashidze N, Ernstmann N, Ansmann L. Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Breast Cancer Care - An Observational Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1275–1284. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S300061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberger B, Heuser C, Diekmann A, et al. Questions and emotional expressions from patients and companions while participating in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in breast and gynecological cancer centers. Patient Educ Couns. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellenberger B, Heuser C, Diekmann A, et al. How shared is decision-making in multidisciplinary tumour conferences with patient participation? An observational study. Health Expect. 2022;25(6):3297–3306. doi:10.1111/hex.13638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser C, Diekmann A, Schellenberger B, et al. Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary Tumor Conferences from the Providers’ Perspective: is It Feasible in Routine Cancer Care? J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1729–1739. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S283166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann A, Heuser C, Schellenberger B, et al. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences: providers’ perceptions of patients’ need satisfaction and emotional experiences. Psycho-oncology. 2020;29(8):1263–1271. doi:10.1002/pon.5413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tishelman C. A conceptual framework for patient-professional communication: an application to the cancer context. Psycho-oncology. 2005;14(10):801. doi:10.1002/pon.950
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–98. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. 2010;341:c4587. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuser C, Diekmann A, Ernstmann N, Ansmann L. Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumour conferences in breast cancer care (PINTU): a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e024621. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Horwitz S, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt M, Landsverk J. Mixed method designs in implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(1):44–53. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0314-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radecki SE, Nyquist JG, Gates JD, Abrahamson S, Henson DE. Educational Characteristics of Tumor Conferences in Teaching and Non‐teaching Hospitals. J Cancer Educ. 2009;9(4):204–216.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Del Piccolo L, de Haes H, Heaven C. Development of the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences to code health providers’ responses (VR-CoDES-P) to patient cues and concerns. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(2):149–155. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann C, Del Piccolo L, Bensing J, et al. Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES). Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(2):141–148. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Atkins L, Richardson A, Tarrant R, Ramirez A-J. Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:202. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prüfer P, Rexroth M. Two-Phases-Pretesting: [Zwei-Phasen-Pretesting]. ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht. 2000;8:548.
   Google Scholar
• Kriston L, Scholl I, Hölzel L, Simon D, Loh A, Härter M. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):94–99. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers T, Enfield NJ. A coding scheme for question–response sequences in conversation. J Pragmat. 2010;42(10):2620–2626. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005;43(10):960–969. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000178172.40344.70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301–312. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundsen A, Nordøy T, Lingen KE, Sørlie T, Bergvik S. Is patient behavior during consultation associated with shared decision-making? A study of patients’ questions, cues and concerns in relation to observed shared decision-making in a cancer outpatient clinic. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(3):399–405. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butow PN, Brown RF, Cogar S, Tattersall MHN, Dunn SM. Oncologists’ reactions to cancer patients’ verbal cues. Psycho-oncology. 2002;11(1):47–58. doi:10.1002/pon.556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finset A, Heyn L, Ruland C. Patterns in clinicians’ responses to patient emotion in cancer care. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(1):80–85. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull C, Byrnes J, Hettiarachchi R, Downes M. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(5):1023–1035. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster EB, Baars EW, Delnoij DMJ. Patient-reported quality of care in anthroposophic and integrative medicine: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(2):276–285. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup T, Gandamihardja TAK, McInerney S, Green JSA, Sevdalis N. Do multidisciplinary cancer care teams suffer decision-making fatigue: an observational, longitudinal team improvement study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027303. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansmann L, Baumann W, Gostomzyk J, et al. DNVF-Memorandum III – Methoden für die Versorgungsforschung, Teil 4 – Konzept und Methoden der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung. Kapitel 1 – Definition und Konzept der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung. [DNVF-Memorandum III - Methods For Health Services Research, Part 4 - Concept and Methods For Organizational Health Services Research. Chapter 1 - Definition and Concept of Organizational Health Services Research]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81(3):e64–e71. doi:10.1055/a-0862-0527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kočo L, Siebers CCN, Schlooz M, et al. Mapping Current Organizational Structure and Improvement Points of Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings - An Interview Study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:2421–2430. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S380293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL, Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Commun. 2001;13(1):61–73. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1301_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):291–309. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansmann L, Pfaff H. Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(4):349–352. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061. doi:10.1136/bmj.n2061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar