Thin minimal rim width at Bruch’s membrane opening is associated with glaucomatous paracentral visual field loss

References

• WeinrebRNKhawPTPrimary open-angle glaucomaLancet200436394221711172015158634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeltnerJLJohnsonCACelloKEClassification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment studyArch Ophthalmol2003121564365012742841
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AbeRYDiniz-FilhoACostaVPGracitelliCPBaigSMedeirosFAThe impact of location of progressive visual field loss on longitudinal changes in quality of life of patients with glaucomaOphthalmology2016123355255726704883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoeckelberghTRBrouwerWHCornelissenFWVan WolffelaarPKooijmanACThe effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator studyArch Ophthalmol2002120111509151612427065
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ParkSCDe MoraesCGTengCCTelloCLiebmannJMRitchRInitial parafoveal versus peripheral scotomas in glaucoma: risk factors and visual field characteristicsOphthalmology201111891782178921665283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JungKIParkHYParkCKCharacteristics of optic disc morphology in glaucoma patients with parafoveal scotoma compared to peripheral scotomaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20125384813482022714895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NduagubaCUgurluSCaprioliJAcquired pits of the optic nerve in glaucoma: prevalence and associated visual field lossActa Ophthalmol Scand19987632732779686836
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeeJHangaiMKimuraYTakayamaKKeeCYoshimuraNMeasurement of macular ganglion cell layer and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer to detect paracentral scotoma in early glaucomaGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol201325182003201223620092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakayamaKHangaiMKimuraYThree-dimensional imaging of lamina cribrosa defects in glaucoma using swept-source optical coherence tomographyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20135474798480723778878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PovažayBHoferBHermannBMinimum distance mapping using three-dimensional optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosisJ Biomed Opt200712404120417867793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GardinerSKRenRYangHFortuneBBurgoyneCFDemirelSA method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim areaAm J Ophthalmol20141573540549e1e224239775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MizumotoKGoshoMZakoMCorrelation between optic nerve head structural parameters and glaucomatous visual field indicesClin Ophthalmol201481203120825028533
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollet-VillardFChiquetCRomanetJPNoelCAptelFStructure-function relationships with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve head measure-mentsstructure-function relationships with SD-OCTInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20145552953296224692125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkSCBrummJFurlanettoRLLamina cribrosa depth in different stages of glaucomaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20155632059206425722212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JungKIJungYParkKTParkCKFactors affecting plastic lamina cribrosa displacement in glaucoma patientsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201455127709771525370516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SawadaYHangaiMMurataKIshikawaMYoshitomiTLamina cribrosa depth variation measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography within and between four glaucomatous optic disc phenotypesInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201556105777578426325416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiDTaniguchiEVCaiSComparison of swept-source and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in quantitative characterisation of the optic nerve headBr J Ophthalmol2017101329930427297219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonasJBKlingFGründlerAEOptic disc shape, corneal astigmatism, and amblyopiaOphthalmology199710411193419379373129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VongphanitJMitchellPWangJJPopulation prevalence of tilted optic disks and the relationship of this sign to refractive errorAm J Ophthalmol2002133567968511992866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoomisSJKangJHWeinrebRNAssociation of CAV1/CAV2 genomic variants with primary open-angle glaucoma overall and by gender and pattern of visual field lossOphthalmology2014121250851624572674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MansouriKNuyenBN WeinrebRImproved visualization of deep ocular structures in glaucoma using high penetration optical coherence tomographyExpert Rev Med Devices2014105621628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkHYShinHYParkCKImaging the posterior segment of the eye using swept-source optical coherence tomography in myopic glaucoma eyes: comparison with enhanced-depth imagingAm J Ophthalmol2014157355055724239773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatelNBSullivan-MeeMHarwerthRSThe relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic nerve head neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucomaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201455106802681625249610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElzeTPasqualeLRShenLQChenTCWiggsJLBexPJPatterns of functional vision loss in glaucoma determined with archetypal analysisJ Royal Soc Interface201512103 pii: 20141118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KangJHLoomisSJRosnerBAWiggsJLPasqualeLRComparison of risk factor profiles for primary open-angle glaucoma subtypes defined by pattern of visual field loss: A prospective studyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20155642439244825758813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChauhanBCO’LearyNAlmobarakFAEnhanced detection of open-angle glaucoma with an anatomically accurate optical coherence tomography-derived neuroretinal rim parameterOphthalmology2013120353554323265804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RebolledaGCasadoAOblancaNMuñoz-NegreteFJThe new Bruch’s membrane opening – minimum rim width classification improves optical coherence tomography specificity in tilted discsClin Ophthalmol2016102417242527980390
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchumanJSPedut-KloizmanTHertzmarkEReproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomographyOphthalmology199610311188918988942887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EndersPAdlerWSchaubFNovel Bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim area equalizes disc size dependency and offers high diagnostic power for glaucomaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201657156596660327951592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BroadwayDCNicolelaMTDranceSMOptic disk appearances in primary open-angle glaucomaSurv Ophthalmol199943Suppl 1S223S24310416767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeEJKimTWKimMKimHInfluence of lamina cribrosa thickness and depth on the rate of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thinningOphthalmology2015122472172925433610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimDWJeoungJWKimYWPrelamina and lamina cribrosa in glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field lossInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20165741662167027054519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeSHKimTWLeeEJGirardMJAMariJMDiagnostic power of lamina cribrosa depth and curvature in glaucomaInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201758275576228146240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuigleyHAroraKIdreesSBiomechanical responses of lamina cribrosa to intraocular pressure change assessed by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma eyesInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20175852566257728494490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SigalIAYangHRobertsMDBurgoyneCFDownsJCIOP-induced lamina cribrosa displacement and scleral canal expansion: An analysis of factor interactions using parameterized eye-specific modelsInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20115231896181220881292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KwunYHanJCKeeCComparison of lamina cribrosa thickness in normal tension glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field defectAm J Ophthalmol20151593512518.e125498357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RhodesLAHuisinghCEQuinnAEComparison of bruch’s membrane opening minimum rim width among those with Normal ocular health by raceAm J Ophthalmol201717411311827825982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar