Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the etonogestrel implantable contraceptive

References

• FloresJBBalderasMLBonillaMCVazquez-EstradaLClinical experience and acceptability of the etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implantInt J Gynaecol Obstet200590322823316043175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CroxattoHBUrbancsekJMassaiRCoelingh BenninkHvan BeekAA multicentre efficacy and safety study of the single contraceptive implant Implanon. Implanon Study GroupHum Reprod199914497698110221230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Implanon (package insert)Roseland, NJOrganon USA Inc2006
   Google Scholar
• CroxattoHBMechanisms that explain the contraceptive action of progestin implants for womenContraception2002651212711861052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WenzlRvan BeekASchnabelPHuberJPharmacokinetics of etonogestrel released from the contraceptive implant ImplanonContraception19985852832889883383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MakarainenLvan BeekATuomivaaraLAsplundBCoelingh BenninkHOvarian function during the use of a single contraceptive implant: Implanon compared with NorplantFertil Steril19986947147219548163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaviesGCFengLXNewtonJRVan BeekACoelingh-BenninkHJRelease characteristics, ovarian activity and menstrual bleeding pattern with a single contraceptive implant releasing 3-ketodesogestrelContraception19934732512618462316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiazSPavezMMoo-YoungAJBardinCWCroxattoHBClinical trial with 3-keto-desogestrel subdermal implantsContraception19914443934081756627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CroxattoHBMakarainenLThe pharmacodynamics and efficacy of Implanon. An overview of the dataContraception1998586 Suppl91S97S10095979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMPLANON approval letterUS Food and Drug Administration2006
   Google Scholar
• InalMMYildirimYErtopcuKAvciMEOzelmasITinarSEffect of the subdermal contraceptive etonogestrel implant (Implanon) on biochemical and hormonal parameters (three years follow-up)Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care200813323824218609340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarneyPPatelARosenKShapiroLSKaunitzAMSafety and efficacy of a single-rod etonogestrel implant (Implanon): results from 11 international clinical trialsFertil Steril172008
   Google Scholar
• ZhengSRZhengHMQianSZSangGWKaperRFA randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implantContraception19996011810549446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison-WoolrychMHillRUnintended pregnancies with the etonogestrel implant (Implanon): a case series from postmarketing experience in AustraliaContraception200571430630815792651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShulmanLPGabrielHManagement and localization strategies for the nonpalpable Implanon rodContraception200673432533016531160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FunkSMillerMMMishellDRJrSafety and efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable contraceptive containing etonogestrelContraception200571531932615854630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LantzANosherJLPasqualeSSiegelRLUltrasound characteristics of subdermally implanted Implanon contraceptive rodsContraception19975653233279437562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WesterwaySCPickerRChristieJImplanon implant detection with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imagingAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol200343534635014717309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PymarHCCreininMDSchwartzJL“Pop-out” method of levonorgestrel implant removalContraception199959638338710518233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BitzerJTschudinSAlderJAcceptability and side-effects of Implanon in Switzerland: a retrospective study by the Implanon Swiss Study GroupEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20049427828415799185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WitjaksonoJLauTMAffandiBRogersPAOestrogen treatment for increased bleeding in Norplant users: preliminary resultsHum Reprod199611Suppl 21091148982752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeisbergEHickeyMPalmerDA pilot study to assess the effect of three short-term treatments on frequent and/or prolonged bleeding compared to placebo in women using ImplanonHum Reprod200621129530216284061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-SanchezFBracheVTheveninFCochonLFaundesAHormonal treatment for bleeding irregularities in Norplant implant usersAm J Obstet Gynecol199617439199228633669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CroxattoHBClinical profile of Implanon: a single-rod etonogestrel contraceptive implantEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care20005Suppl 2212811246604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WalchKUnfriedGHuberJImplanon versus medroxyprogesterone acetate: effects on pain scores in patients with symptomatic endometriosis – a pilot studyContraception2009791293419041438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdwardsJEMooreAImplanon. A review of clinical studiesBr J Fam Plann1999244 Suppl31610068281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LakhaFGlasierAFContinuation rates of Implanon in the UK: data from an observational study in a clinical settingContraception200674428728916982226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReinprayoonDTaneepanichskulSBunyavejchevinSEffects of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (Implanon on parameters of breastfeeding compared to those of an intrauterine deviceContraception200062523924611172794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaneepanichskulSReinprayoonDThaithumyanonPPraisuwannaPTosukhowongPDiebenTEffects of the etonogestrel-releasing implant Implanon and a nonmedicated intrauterine device on the growth of breast-fed infantsContraception200673436837116531169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeerthuizenRvan BeekAMassaiRMakarainenLHoutJBenninkHCBone mineral density during long-term use of the progestagen contraceptive implant Implanon compared to a non-hormonal method of contraceptionHum Reprod200015111812210611199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro-DantasCEspejo-ArceXLui-FilhoJFFernandesAMMonteiroIBahamondesLA three-year longitudinal evaluation of the forearm bone density of users of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implantsReprod Health200741117997844
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BiswasAViegasOARoyACEffect of Implanon and Norplant subdermal contraceptive implants on serum lipids – a randomized comparative studyContraception200368318919314561539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merki-FeldGSImthurnBSeifertBEffects of the progestagen-only contraceptive implant Implanon on cardiovascular risk factorsClin Endocrinol (Oxf)200868335536017854390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiswasABiswasSViegasOAEffect of etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant (Implanon) on liver function tests – a randomized comparative study with Norplant implantsContraception200470537938215504376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HatcherRTrussellJStewartFKowalDContraceptive Technology19th Revised edNew YorkArdent Media, Inc2007
   Google Scholar