Vaginal Self-Sampling as a Diagnosis Tool in Low-Income Countries and Potential Applications for Exploring the Infectious Causes of Miscarriage

References

• Suh DH , KimJW, KangS, KimHJ, LeeKH. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2013.J. Gynecol. Oncol.25 (3), 236–248 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabero-Roura L , RushwanH. An update on maternal mortality in low-resource countries.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.125 (2), 175–180 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan R , NeneBM, ShastriSSet al. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N. Engl. J. Med. 360 (14), 1385–1394 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dareng EO , Jedy-AgbaE, BamisayePet al. Influence of spirituality and modesty on acceptance of self-sampling for cervical cancer screening. PLoS ONE 10 (11), e0141679 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronco G , DillnerJ, ElfstromKMet al. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet 383 (9916), 524–532 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meites E , LinC, UngerERet al. Can clinical tests help monitor human papillomavirus vaccine impact? Int. J. Cancer 133 (5), 1101–1106 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazcano-Ponce E , LorinczAT, Cruz-ValdezAet al. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH), a community-based randomised controlled trial. Lancet 378 (9806), 1868–1873 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giakoumelou S , WheelhouseN, CuschieriK, EntricanG, HowieSE, HorneAW. The role of infection in miscarriage.Hum. Reprod. Update22 (1), 116–133 (2016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usala SJ , SchumacherGF. Volumetric self-sampling of cervicovaginal fluid: a new approach to ovulation timing.Fertil. Steril.39 (3), 304–309 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenzel-Poore MP , HallickLM, FendrickJL, NeuburgM, StorrsFJ, HanifinJM. Herpes simplex virus shedding in genital secretions.Sex. Transm. Dis.14 (1), 17–22 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer S . Inexpensive population screening for abnormal cells from the uterine cervix and valid results using the vaginal cytopipette.Gynecol. Oncol.46 (1), 62–64 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EA , GoldbergGL, HaganRJ, KadishAS, BurkRD. Self-administered home cervicovaginal lavage: a novel tool for the clinical-epidemiologic investigation of genital human papillomavirus infections.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.167 (1), 104–107 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscicki AB . Comparison between methods for human papillomavirus DNA testing: a model for self-testing in young women.J. Infect. Dis.167 (3), 723–725 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markos AR , WadeAA, WalzmanM, ShahmaneshM. Self sampling as part of screening for sexually transmitted diseases in clinic attenders. A preliminary study.Int. J. STD AIDS5 (4), 284–286 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbyn M , VerdoodtF, SnijdersPJet al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 15 (2), 172–183 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronco G , Giorgi-RossiP, CarozziFet al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 11 (3), 249–257 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijkaart DC , BerkhofJ, RozendaalLet al. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 13 (1), 78–88 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper DM , NollWW, BelloniDR, ColeBF. Randomized clinical trial of PCR-determined human papillomavirus detection methods: self-sampling versus clinician-directed-biologic concordance and women's preferences.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.186 (3), 365–373 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TC Jr , DennyL, KuhnL, PollackA, LorinczA. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.JAMA283 (1), 81–86 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders PJ , VerhoefVM, ArbynMet al. High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening. Int. J. Cancer 132 (10), 2223–2236 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petignat P , HankinsC, WalmsleySet al. Self-sampling is associated with increased detection of human papillomavirus DNA in the genital tract of HIV-seropositive women. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41 (4), 527–534 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzato FR , SingerA, HoLet al. Human papillomavirus detection for cervical cancer prevention with polymerase chain reaction in self-collected samples. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186 (5), 962–968 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancho-Garnier H , TamaletC, HalfonPet al. HPV self-sampling or the Pap-smear: a randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France. Int. J. Cancer 133 (11), 2681–2687 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer BM , TaylorMC, FrickeJL, BaselskiVS, SibaiBM. The accuracy and patient preference for self-collected group B Streptococcus cultures.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.173 (4), 1325–1328 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MC , MercerBM, EngelhardtKF, FrickeJL. Patient preference for self-collected cultures for group B Streptococcus in pregnancy.J. Nurse Midwifery42 (5), 410–413 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manning S , TallmanP, FoxmanB. Prevalence and co-colonization with group B Streptococcus (Gbs) among heterosexual college couples.Ann. Epidemiol.10 (7), 472 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price D , ShawE, HowardM, ZazulakJ, WatersH, KaczorowskiJ. Self-sampling for group B Streptococcus in women 35 to 37 weeks pregnant is accurate and acceptable: a randomized cross-over trial.J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can.28 (12), 1083–1088 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks P , Diaz-PerezMJ. Patient self-collection of group B streptococcal specimens during pregnancy.J. Am. Board Fam. Med.22 (2), 136–140 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko JK , YungSS, SetoMT, LeeCP. A questionnaire study on the acceptability of self-sampling versus screening by clinicians for Group B Streptococcus.J. Chin. Med. Assoc.79 (2), 83–87 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya A , CryanB, O'SullivanK, GreeneRA, HigginsJR. Self-collected versus health professional-collected genital swabs to identify the prevalence of group B Streptococcus: a comparison of patient preference and efficacy.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.139 (1), 43–45 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwebke JR , MorganSC, WeissHL. The use of sequential self-obtained vaginal smears for detecting changes in the vaginal flora.Sex. Transm. Dis.24 (4), 236–239 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodstrcil LA , WalkerSM, HockingJSet al. Incident bacterial vaginosis (BV) in women who have sex with women is associated with behaviors that suggest sexual transmission of BV. Clin. Infect. Dis. 60 (7), 1042–1053 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fethers KA , FairleyCK, MortonAet al. Early sexual experiences and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis. J. Infect. Dis. 200 (11), 1662–1670 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw CS , WalkerSM, VodstrcilLAet al. The influence of behaviors and relationships on the vaginal microbiota of women and their female partners: the WOW Health Study. J. Infect. Dis. 209 (10), 1562–1572 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard JP , FenollarF, HenryM, BretelleF, RaoultD. Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis.Clin. Infect. Dis.47 (1), 33–43 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretelle F , RozenbergP, PascalAet al. High Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis vaginal loads are associated with preterm birth. Clin. Infect. Dis. 60 (6), 860–867 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard JP , FenollarF, RaoultD, BoubliL, BretelleF. Self-collected vaginal swabs for the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis and the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.31 (4), 513–518 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwebke JR , FlynnMS, RiversCA. Prevalence of Gardnerella vaginalis among women with lactobacillus-predominant vaginal flora.Sex. Transm. Infect.90 (1), 61–63 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton M , SternbergM, KoumansEH, McQuillanG, BermanS, MarkowitzL. The prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the United States, 2001–2004.Clin. Infect. Dis.45 (10), 1319–1326 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliendo AM , JordanJA, GreenAM, IngersollJ, DiclementeRJ, WingoodGM. Real-time PCR improves detection of Trichomonas vaginalis infection compared with culture using self-collected vaginal swabs.Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol.13 (3), 145–150 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van de Wijgert J , AltiniL, JonesHet al. Two methods of self-sampling compared with clinician sampling to detect reproductive tract infections in Gugulethu, South Africa. Sex. Transm. Dis. 33 (8), 516–523 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergers-Spooren HC , van der MeijdenWI, LuijendijkA, DondersG. Self-sampling in the diagnosis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis.J. Low Genit. Tract. Dis.17 (2), 187–192 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotman RM , ShardellMD, GajerPet al. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J. Infect. Dis. 210 (11), 1723–1733 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox J , TabriziSN, MillerPet al. Evaluation of self-collected samples in contrast to practitioner-collected samples for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis by polymerase chain reaction among women living in remote areas. Sex. Transm. Dis. 29 (11), 647–654 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernesky MA , HookEWIII, MartinDHet al. Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Sex. Transm. Dis. 32 (12), 729–733 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J , HusmanC, DeSilvaL, ChangR, PeraltaL. Evaluation of self-collected vaginal swab, first void urine, and endocervical swab specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent females.J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol.21 (6), 355–360 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebb KP , PaukkuMH, Pai-DhungatMR, GyamfiAA, ShaferMA. Home STI testing: the adolescent female's opinion.J. Adolesc. Health35 (6), 462–467 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick V , Van Der PolB, DodgeB, BaldwinA, FortenberryJD. A mixed methods approach to assess the likelihood of testing for STI using self-collected samples among behaviourally bisexual women.Sex. Transm. Infect.91 (5), 329–333 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunny C , TaylorD, HoangLet al. Self-collected versus clinician-collected sampling for chlamydia and gonorrhea screening: a systemic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10 (7), e0132776 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhawan AE , ChapinKC, SallowayRet al. Prevalence and predictors of trichomonas infection in newly incarcerated women. Sex. Transm. Dis. 39 (12), 973–978 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobian AA , GaydosC, GrayRHet al. Male circumcision and Mycoplasma genitalium infection in female partners: a randomised trial in Rakai, Uganda. Sex. Transm. Infect. 90 (2), 150–154 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKechnie ML , HillmanRJ, JonesRet al. The prevalence of urogenital microorganisms detected by a multiplex PCR-reverse line blot assay in women attending three sexual health clinics in Sydney, Australia. J. Med. Microbiol. 60 (Pt 7), 1010–1016 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelinghuys MJ , EhlersMM, DreyerAW, LombaardHA, KockMM. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis in pregnant women.BMC Infect. Dis.14, 171 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YH , HowellMR, GaydosJC, McKeeKTJr, QuinnTC, GaydosCA. Preference among female Army recruits for use of self-administrated vaginal swabs or urine to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.Sex. Transm. Dis.30 (10), 769–773 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan S , BrowneJ, McKenzieH, TempletonA, BhattacharyaS. Evaluation of endocervical, first-void urine and self-administered vulval swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a miscarriage population.BJOG112 (1), 103–106 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safaeian M , KiddugavuM, GravittPEet al. Comparability of self-collected vaginal swabs and physician-collected cervical swabs for detection of human papillomavirus infections in Rakai, Uganda. Sex. Transm. Dis. 34 (7), 429–436 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serwadda D , WawerMJ, ShahKVet al. Use of a hybrid capture assay of self-collected vaginal swabs in rural Uganda for detection of human papillomavirus. J. Infect. Dis. 180 (4), 1316–1319 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamalet C , RichetH, CarcopinoXet al. Testing for human papillomavirus and measurement of viral load of HPV 16 and 18 in self-collected vaginal swabs of women who do not undergo cervical cytological screening in Southern France. J. Med. Virol. 82 (8), 1431–1437 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutlee F , HankinsC, LapointeN. Comparison between vaginal tampon and cervicovaginal lavage specimen collection for detection of human papillomavirus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. The Canadian Women's HIV Study Group.J. Med. Virol.51 (1), 42–47 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AM , SasieniP, SingerA. A prospective double-blind cross-sectional study of the accuracy of the use of dry vaginal tampons for self-sampling of human papillomaviruses.BJOG122 (3), 388–394 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lack N , WestB, JeffriesDet al. Comparison of non-invasive sampling methods for detection of HPV in rural African women. Sex. Transm. Infect. 81 (3), 239–241 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandeying V , GarlandSM, TabriziSN. Prevalence and typing of human papillomavirus (HPV) among female sex workers and outpatient women in southern Thailand.Sex. Health3 (1), 11–14 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boskey ER , Atherly-TrimSA, O'CampoPJ, StrobinoDM, MisraDP. Acceptability of a self-sampling technique to collect vaginal smears for gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.Womens Health Issues14 (1), 14–18 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman AR , BrewerNT, LiebmanAK, RinasAC, SmithJS. Optimising human papillomavirus self-testing for high risk women.Sex. Transm. Infect.87 (2), 118–122 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HE , MansukhaniMM, TongGX, WesthoffCL. Validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and HPV testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study.PLoS ONE8 (12), e82115 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndayisaba G , VerwijsMC, vanESet al. Feasibility and acceptability of a novel cervicovaginal lavage self-sampling device among women in Kigali, Rwanda. Sex. Transm. Dis. 40 (7), 552–555 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HE , AllanBR, van de WijgertJHet al. Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45 (6), 1679–1683 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler D , WallaceM, BennieTet al. High risk human papillomavirus persistence among HIV-infected young women in South Africa. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 33, 219–221 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler DH , LaherF, LazarusEet al. A viable and simple self-sampling method for Human Papillomavirus detection among South African adolescents. J. Immunol. Tech. Infect. Dis. 2 (3), doi:10.4172/2329-9541.100011 (2013) ( Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Adler DH , AlmudevarA, GrayGE, AllanB, WilliamsonAL. High level of agreement between clinician-collected and self-collected samples for HPV detection among South African adolescents.J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol.25 (4), 280–281 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redelinghuys MJ , EhlersMM, DreyerAW, LombaardH, OlorunjuSA, KockMM. A cross-sectional study on the relationship of age, gestational age and HIV infection to bacterial vaginosis and genital mycoplasma infection.BMJ Open5 (10), e008530 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm PD , MoodleyP, NzimandeG, BalkistanR, ConnollyC, SturmAW. Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis on self-collected vaginal tampon specimens.Int. J. STD AIDS13 (8), 559–563 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HE , AltiniL, deKA, YoungT, van de WijgertJH. Home-based versus clinic-based self-sampling and testing for sexually transmitted infections in Gugulethu, South Africa: randomised controlled trial.Sex. Transm. Infect.83 (7), 552–557 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansil P , WittetS, LimJL, WinklerJL, PaulP, JeronimoJ. Acceptability of self-collection sampling for HPV-DNA testing in low-resource settings: a mixed methods approach.BMC Public Health14, 596 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders GG , AndabatiG, DondersFet al. Acceptance of self-testing for increased vaginal pH in different subsets of Ugandan women. Int. J. STD AIDS 23 (1), 30–35 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray RH , WawerMJ, GirdnerJet al. Use of self-collected vaginal swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex. Transm. Dis. 25 (8), 450 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma ME , GrayRH, KiwanukaNet al. The short-term variability of bacterial vaginosis diagnosed by Nugent Gram stain criteria among sexually active women in Rakai, Uganda. Sex. Transm. Dis. 38 (2), 111–116 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell SM , SekikuboM, BiryabaremaCet al. Factors associated with high-risk HPV positivity in a low-resource setting in sub-Saharan Africa. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 210 (1), 81–87 (2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting J , MugoN, KwatamporaJet al. High-risk human papillomavirus messenger RNA testing in physician- and self-collected specimens for cervical lesion detection in high-risk women, Kenya. Sex. Transm. Dis. 40 (7), 584–589 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rositch AF , GatugutaA, ChoiRYet al. Knowledge and acceptability of pap smears, self-sampling and HPV vaccination among adult women in Kenya. PLoS ONE 7 (7), e40766 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal EM , El SayedGA, El BeheryMM, El ShennawyGA. HPV detection in a self-collected vaginal swab combined with VIA for cervical cancer screening with correlation to histologically confirmed CIN.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.290 (6), 1207–1213 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crucitti T , JespersV, MulengaC, KhondoweS, VandepitteJ, BuveA. Trichomonas vaginalis is highly prevalent in adolescent girls, pregnant women, and commercial sex workers in Ndola, Zambia.Sex. Transm. Dis.37 (4), 223–227 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowjanya AP , PaulP, VedanthamHet al. Suitability of self-collected vaginal samples for cervical cancer screening in periurban villages in Andhra Pradesh, India. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (5), 1373–1378 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowjanya AP , JainM, PoliURet al. Prevalence and distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and in normal women in Andhra Pradesh, India. BMC Infect. Dis. 5, 116 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labani S , AsthanaS. Human papillomavirus viral load on careHPV testing of self-collected vaginal samples vs. clinician-collected cervical samples.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.181, 233–239 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravitt PE , PaulP, KatkiHAet al. Effectiveness of VIA, Pap, and HPV DNA testing in a cervical cancer screening program in a peri-urban community in Andhra Pradesh, India. PLoS ONE 5 (10), e13711 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao YL , SellorsJW, EderPSet al. A new HPV-DNA test for cervical-cancer screening in developing regions: a cross-sectional study of clinical accuracy in rural China. Lancet Oncol. 9 (10), 929–936 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao FH , JeronimoJ, QiaoYLet al. An evaluation of novel, lower-cost molecular screening tests for human papillomavirus in rural China. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila) 6 (9), 938–948 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao YL , JeronimoJ, ZhaoFHet al. Lower cost strategies for triage of human papillomavirus DNA-positive women. Int. J. Cancer 134 (12), 2891–2901 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SM , HuSY, ChenFet al. Clinical evaluation of human papillomavirus detection by careHPV test on physician-samples and self-samples using the indicating FTA Elute(R) card. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 15 (17), 7085–7089 (2014).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang SK , CiPW, VelicerCet al. Comparison of HPV genotypes and viral load between different sites of genital tract: the significance for cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol. 38 (2), 168–173 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DC , BhattaMP, SmithJSet al. Assessment of high-risk human papillomavirus infections using clinician- and self-collected cervical sampling methods in rural women from far western Nepal. PLoS ONE 9 (6), e101255 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongworapat K , KeawvichitR, SirirojnBet al. Detection of human papillomavirus from self-collected vaginal samples of women in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Sex. Transm. Dis. 35 (2), 172–173 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawu FO , DaviesSC, McKechnieM, SedyaningsihER, WidihastutiA, HillmanRJ. Sexually transmissible infections among female sex workers in Manado, Indonesia, using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based reverse line blot assay.Sex. Health8 (1), 52–60 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franciscatto LG , SilvaCM, BarcellosRBet al. Comparison of urine and self-collected vaginal samples for detecting human papillomavirus DNA in pregnant women. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 125 (1), 69–72 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holanda F Jr , CasteloA, VerasTM, de AlmeidaFM, LinsMZ, DoresGB. Primary screening for cervical cancer through self sampling.Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.95 (2), 179–184 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippman SA , JonesHE, LuppiCG, PinhoAA, VerasMA, van de WijgertJH. Home-based self-sampling and self-testing for sexually transmitted infections: acceptable and feasible alternatives to provider-based screening in low-income women in Sao Paulo, Brazil.Sex. Transm. Dis.34 (7), 421–428 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi AT , FregnaniJH, Possati-ResendeJC, NetoCS, VillaLL, Longatto-FilhoA. Self-collection for high-risk HPV detection in Brazilian women using the careHPV test.Gynecol. Oncol.131 (1), 131–134 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreccio C , CorvalanA, MargozziniPet al. Baseline assessment of prevalence and geographical distribution of HPV types in Chile using self-collected vaginal samples. BMC Public Health 8, 78 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeza J , GarciaPJ, SeguraEet al. Feasibility of Chlamydia trachomatis screening and treatment in pregnant women in Lima, Peru: a prospective study in two large urban hospitals. Sex. Transm. Infect. 91 (1), 7–10 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum AJ , GageJC, AlfaroKMet al. Acceptability of self-collected versus provider-collected sampling for HPV DNA testing among women in rural El Salvador. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 126 (2), 156–160 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quincy BL , TurbowDJ, DabinettLN, DillinghamR, MonroeS. Diagnostic accuracy of self-collected human papillomavirus specimens as a primary screen for cervical cancer.J. Obstet. Gynaecol.32 (8), 795–799 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeronimo J , BansilP, LimJet al. A multicountry evaluation of careHPV testing, visual inspection with acetic acid, and papanicolaou testing for the detection of cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 24 (3), 576–585 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamalet C , LeRL, LeandriFX, HeidP, SanchoGH, PianaL. Vaginal self-sampling is an adequate means of screening HR-HPV types in women not participating in regular cervical cancer screening.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.19 (1), E44–E50 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentschke M , ChenK, ArbynMet al. Comparative evaluation of two vaginal self-sampling devices for the detection of human papillomavirus infections. J. Clin. Virol. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2015.08.011 (2015) ( Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarinci IC , LittonAG, Garces-PalacioIC, PartridgeEE, CastlePE. Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African–American women living in the Mississippi Delta.Womens Health Issues23 (2), E123–E130 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas SK , MaY, SammelMDet al. Placental inflammation and viral infection are implicated in second trimester pregnancy loss. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195 (3), 797–802 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud D , ReganL, GreubG. Emerging role of Chlamydia and Chlamydia-like organisms in adverse pregnancy outcomes.Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis.21 (1), 70–76 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders GG , VanCK, BellenGet al. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG 116 (10), 1315–1324 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar MR , OzerolIH, GucluerN, CelikO. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in pregnant women.Int. J. Infect. Dis.14 (2), E90–E95 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allanson B , JenningsB, JacquesA, CharlesAK, KeilAD, DickinsonJE. Infection and fetal loss in the mid-second trimester of pregnancy.Aust. NZ. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.50 (3), 221–225 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short VL , JensenJS, NelsonDB, MurrayPJ, NessRB, HaggertyCL. Mycoplasma genitalium among young, urban pregnant women.Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol.2010, 984760 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feist A , SydlerT, GebbersJJ, PospischilA, GuscettiF. No association of Chlamydia with abortion.J. R. Soc. Med.92 (5), 237–238 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkowska-Trojniel M , Zdrodowska-StefanowB, Ostaszewska-PuchalskaI, RedzkoS, PrzepiescJ, ZdrodowskiM. The influence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on spontaneous abortions.Adv. Med. Sci.54 (1), 86–90 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud D , GreubG. Intracellular bacteria and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.17 (9), 1312–1322 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud D , GoyG, OsterheldMCet al. Role of Waddlia chondrophila placental infection in miscarriage. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 (3), 460–464 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baud D , GoyG, GerberS, VialY, HohlfeldP, GreubG. Evidence of maternal–fetal transmission of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae.Emerg. Infect. Dis.15 (1), 120–121 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Million M , RoblotF, CarlesDet al. Reevaluation of the risk of fetal death and malformation after Q Fever. Clin. Infect. Dis. 59 (2), 256–260 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith B , KempM, EthelbergSet al. Listeria monocytogenes: maternal–foetal infections in Denmark 1994–2005. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 41 (1), 21–25 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MY , MahMW, MemishZA. Brucellosis in pregnant women.Clin. Infect. Dis.32 (8), 1172–1177 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont HT , LaSB, WilliamsR, RaoultD. A focus of tick-borne relapsing fever in southern Zaire.Clin. Infect. Dis.25 (1), 139–144 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathai E , RolainJM, VergheseLet al. Case reports: scrub typhus during pregnancy in India. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 97 (5), 570–572 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carles G , MontoyaY, SeveB, RakotofananinaT, LargeaudM, MignotV. [Typhoid fever and pregnancy].J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris)31 (5), 495–499 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raoult D . The new diagnostic techniques highlight the need for negative controls.Clin. Infect. Dis.62 (6), 609 (2016).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubourg G , FenollarF. Epidemiologic studies need asymptomatic controls.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.21 (8), E51–E52 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocklehurst P , GordonA, HeatleyE, MilanSJ. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000262.pub4 (2013) ( Epub ahead of print).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Bacrie S , NinoveL, NougairedeAet al. Revolutionizing clinical microbiology laboratory organization in hospitals with in situ point-of-care. PLoS ONE 6 (7), e22403 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokhna C , MediannikovO, FenollarFet al. Point-of-care laboratory of pathogen diagnosis in rural Senegal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7 (1), e1999 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretelle F , FenollarF, BaumstarckKet al. Screen-and-treat program by point-of-care of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis in preventing preterm birth (AuTop trial), study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16 (1), 470–1000 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TradOnline . www.tradonline.fr/en/.
   Google Scholar