Evaluation of changes in trabecular alveolar bone during growth using conventional panoramic radiographs

References

• White SC. Oral radiographic predictors of osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson GE. Responses of jawbone to pressure. Gerodontology 2004;21:65–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1455–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, Solar P, Matejka M, Schneider B, Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:459–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amling M, Herden S, Pösl M, Hahn M, Ritzel H, Delling G. Heterogeneity of the skeleton: comparison of the trabecular microarchitecture of the spine, the iliac crest, the femur, and the calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon HS, Won YY, Kim KD, Ruprecht A, Kim HJ, Kook HK, The three-dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:466–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:18–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135: 564.e1–19; discussion 564–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoste S, Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M, Willems G. Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review. Aust Orthod J 2008;24:140–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molly L. Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(Suppl 2):124–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:768–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:267–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:231–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:30–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Park CH, Yi SW, Lim HJ, Hwang HS. Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136: 766.e1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun YS, Lim WH. Bone density at interradicular sites: implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K, Zhao F, Lindh C, Karayianni K, Bone density measurements in intra-oral radiographs. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:225–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonasson G, Bankvall G, Kiliaridis S. Estimation of skeletal bone mineral density by means of the trabecular pattern of the alveolar bone, its interdental thickness, and the bone mass of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:346–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonasson G, Jonasson L, Kiliaridis S. Changes in the radiographic characteristics of the mandibular alveolar process in dentate women with varying bone mineral density: a five-year prospective study. Bone 2006;38:714–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham D, Jonasson G, Kiliaridis S. Assessment of trabecular pattern in periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68:91–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taguchi A, Tanimoto K, Akagawa Y, Suei Y, Wada T, Rohlin M. Trabecular bone pattern of the mandible. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:85–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Seeman E. Skeletal growth and peak bone strength. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;22:687–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonjour JP, Chevalley T, Ferrari S, Rizzoli R. The importance and relevance of peak bone mass in the prevalence of osteoporosis. Salud Publica Mex 2009;51(Suppl 1):5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Seeman E. Structural basis of growth-related gain and age-related loss of bone strength. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47(Suppl 4):iv2–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner CH. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone 1998;23:399–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner CH, Pavalko FM. Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci 1998;3:346–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein-Nulend J, Bacabac RG, Mullender MG. Mechanobiology of bone tissue. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2005;53:576–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raadsheer MC, Kiliaridis S, Van Eijden TM, Van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:323–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg H, Wenneberg B, Engström C. The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:323–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges T, King G, Mohammed A. the effect of age on tooth movement and mineral density in the alveolar tissues of the rat. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:245–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothe LE, Bollen AM, Little RM, Herring SW, Chaison JB, Chen CS, Trabecular and cortical bone as risk factors for orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:476–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S, Lee JY, Kim KE, Gianelly AA, Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:66–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar