The effects of orthodontic bonding steps on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva

References

• Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M. Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol 1996;67:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances–an overview. Br J Orthod 1992;19:199–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Artun J, Brobakken BO. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibonded appliances. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:229–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahn SJ, Ahn SJ, Wen ZT, Brady LJ, Burne RA. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva. Infect Immun 2008;76:4259–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell TJ. The pathogenesis of streptococcal infections: from tooth decay to meningitis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2003;1:219–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga T, Asakawa H, Okahashi N, Hamada S. Sucrose-dependent cell adherence and cariogenicity of serotype c Streptococcus mutans. J Gen Microbiol 1986;132:2873–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zachrisson BU. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber TM VR, editor. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. St Louis, MO: MosbyYear Book; 1994. p 542–626.
   Google Scholar
• Lim BS, Lee SJ, Lee JW, Ahn SJ. Quantitative analysis of adhesion of cariogenic streptococci to orthodontic raw materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:882–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajdic D, McShan WM, McLaughlin RE, Savic G, Chang J, Carson MB, Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:14434–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang IH, Lim BS, Park JR, Hyun JY, Ahn SJ. Effect of orthodontic bonding steps on the initial adhesion of mutans streptococci in the presence of saliva. Angle Orthodontist 2011;81:326–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons RJ, Cohen L, Hay DI. Strains of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus attach to different pellicle receptors. Infect Immun 1986;52:555–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson HF, Demuth DR. Structure, function and immunogenicity of streptococcal antigen I/II polypeptides. Mol Microbiol 1997;23:183–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalichi P, Singh J, Cvitkovitch DG, Santerre JP. The influence of triethylene glycol derived from dental composite resins on the regulation of Streptococcus mutans gene expression. Biomaterials 2009;30:452–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh J, Khalichi P, Cvitkovitch DG, Santerre JP. Composite resin degradation products from BisGMA monomer modulate the expression of genes associated with biofilm formation and other virulence factors in Streptococcus mutans. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;88:551–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev 1986;50:353–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schilling KM, Bowen WH. The activity of glucosyltransferase adsorbed onto saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1988;67:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santerre JP, Shajii L, Leung BW. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001;12:136–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effects of resin composite components on glucosyltransferase of cariogenic bacterium. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:123–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamouda IM A-KA, El Shami FM. Degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:33–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar