Test-Retest Stability and Effects of Psychophysical Methods on the Speech Loudness Discomfort Level

References

• Ades H.W., Graybiel A., Morrill S.N., Tolhurst G.C., Niven J.I. Non-auditory effects of high intensity sound stimulation on deaf human subjects. Aerospace Med. 1958; 29: 454–467
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. American national standard specifications for audiometers - ANSI S3.6–1969. American National Standards Institute, New York 1970
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. American national standard criteria for permissible ambient noise during audiometric testing - S3.1–1977. American National Standards Institute, New York 1977
   Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Edgerton B.J., Gager D.W. Effects of speech materials on the loudness discomfort level. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1979; 44: 435–458
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Svihovec D.A., Carmen R.E., Kunkel H.A. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for SSPL selection. Ear and Hearing 1980; 1: 197–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger K.W. The use of uncomfortable loudness level in hearing aid fittings. Maico Audiol. Lib. Ser. 1976; 15, Report 2
   Google Scholar
• Berger K.W. Rationale and procedures; in Berger, Hagberg and Rane, Prescription of hearing aids: rationale, procedures and results. Herald, Kent 1977; 2–28
   Google Scholar
• Berger K.W. Speech audiometry; in Rose, Audiological assessment. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1978; 227–260
   Google Scholar
• Berger K.W., Hagberg E.N., Rane R.L. Determining hearing aid gain. Hearing Instrum. 1979; 30: 26, 28, 44
   Google Scholar
• Bragg V.C. Toward a more objective hearing aid fitting procedure. Hearing Instrum. 1977; 28: 6–9
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Hudgins C.V., Marquis RJ., Nichols R.H., Peterson G.E., Ross D.A., Stevens S.S. The selection of hearing aids. Laryngoscope, St Louis 1946; 56: 85–115; 135–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerton BJ., Beattie R.C., Wides J. Speech materials and LDL for hearing-impaired listeners. Ear and Hearing 1980; 1: 206–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gengel R.W., Pascoe D., Shore I. A frequency-response procedure for evaluating and selecting hearing aids for severely hearing-inpaired children. J. Speech and Hearing Dis. 1971; 36: 341–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffing T.S., Hinz C.H. Beware the pain threshold! Natn. Hearing Aid J. 1972; 6: 34–35
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson W.R. Clinical measures of hearing aid performance; in Hodgson and Skinner, Hearing aid assessment and use in audiologic habilitation. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1977; 127–144
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone audiometers. ISO Standard 1975; 389
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Hayes D. Hearing aid evaluation - clinical experience with a new philosophy. Archs Otolar. 1976; 102: 214–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Hayes D. Diagnostic speech audiometry. Archs Otolar. 1977; 103: 216–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S. Diagnostic significance of PB word functions. Archs Otolar. 1971; 93: 573–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S. Estimating speech threshold from the PI-PB function. Archs Otolar. 1976; 102: 487–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallstrom L.A., Carstensen K. The perception of loudness and acoustic reflex. Audiol. and Hearing Educ. 1978; 4: 36–38
   Google Scholar
• Kamm C.A., Dirks D.D., Mickey M.R. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1978; 21: 668–681
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• König E.R. Audiological tests for the fitting of hearing aids. J. audiol. Tech. 1976; 15: 132–137
   Google Scholar
• Kopra L.L., Blosser D. Effects of method of measurement on most comfortable loudness level for speech. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1968; 11: 497–508
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kretschmer L. Evaluation procedures for adults; in Donnelly, Interpreting hearing aid technology. Thomas, Springfield 1974; 124–158
   Google Scholar
• McCandless G.A. Hearing aids and loudness discomfort; in Proc. 3rd Oticongress. Oticon, Copenhagen 1973; 39–44
   Google Scholar
• McCandless G.A. Special considerations in evaluating children and the aging for hearing aids; in Rubin, Hearing aids: current developments and concepts. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976; 171–182
   Google Scholar
• McCandless G.A., Miller D.L. Loudness discomfort and hearing aids. Natn. Hearing Aid J. 1972; 6: 7, 28, 32
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D.E., Dirks D.D. Loudness discomfort level under earphone and in the free field: the effects of calibration methods. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974; 56: 172–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D.E., Wilson R.H., Dirks D.D. Loudness discomfort level: selected methods and stimuli. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1974; 56: 577–581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer W. Relations between the discomfort level and the reflex threshold of the middle ear muscles. Audiology 1971; 10: 172–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe D.P. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing impaired subjects. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1975; 84, suppl. 23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priede V.M., Coles R.R. Factors influencing the loudness discomfort level. Sound 1971; 5: 39–46
   Google Scholar
• Ross M. Instruction and review of hearing aid evaluation procedures; in Rubin, Hearing aids: current developments and concepts. University Park Press, Baltimore 1976; 143–148
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz H.D. Loudness discomfort level modification. J. Speech and Hearing Res. 1969; 12: 807–817
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro I. Hearing aid fitting by prescription. Audiology 1976; 15: 163–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman S.R. Tolerance for pure-tones and speech in normal and defective hearing. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 1947; 56: 658–677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner P.H. Relationship of electro- and psychoacoustic measures; in Hodgson and Skinner, Hearing aid assessment and use in audiologic habilitation. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1977; 106–126
   Google Scholar
• Stephens S.D.G. Studies on the uncomfortable loudness level. Sound 1970; 4: 20–23
   Google Scholar
• Stephens S.D.G., Blegvad B., Krogh H.J. The value of some suprathreshold auditory measures. Scand. Audiol. 1977; 6: 213–221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tractor Medical Instruments Division. Clinical manual. Allison model 22 clinical and research audiometer, Tracor, Austin, not dated
   Google Scholar