Distortion-product Otoacoustic Emissions in Middle-aged Subjects with Normal versus Potentially Presbyacusic High-frequency Hearing Loss

References

• Kemp D T. Stimulated acoustic emissions within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386–1391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Löhle E, Pedersen P. Zur klinischen Anwendung click-evozierter otoakustischer Emissionen an der Freiburger HNO-Klinik. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1989; 68: 661–666
   Google Scholar
• Plinkert P, Arnold R, Zenner H P. Evozierte otoakustische Emissionen zum Hörscreening bei Säuglingen. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1990; 69: 108–110
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 93–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 144–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Stagner B B, Coats A C, Martin G K. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/fl ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 220–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 2027–2067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983; 9: 79–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Lumer G. Evaluating travelling wave characteristics in man by an active nonlinear cochlear preprocessing model. In. Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms, J B Allen, J L Hall, A Hubbard, S T Neely, A Tubis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1986; 250–257
   Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Probst R, Coats A C, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Acoustic distortion products in rabbits, Il: Sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposure. Hear Res 1987; 28: 191–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D O, Molnar C E, Matthews J W. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1704–1721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A, Gaskill S, Williams D. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond B 1992; 250: 29–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kummer P, Janssen T, Arnold W. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2fl-f2 distortion-product oto-acoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98(1)197–210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller M, Ort R. Hearing problems in a home for the aged. Acta Otolaryngol 1965; 59: 33–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spoor A. Presbyacusis values in relation to noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1967; 6: 48–57
   Google Scholar
• ISO-1999. Acoustics–Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-induced Hearing Impairment, 2nd edn. International Standardization Organization, Geneva 1990
   Google Scholar
• Association AS-LH. Guidelines for screening for hearing impairments and middle ear disorders. ASHA 1990; 32: 17–24, (Suppl. 2)
   Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B, Cutler W, Martin G. Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 1749–1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns E, Strickland E, Tubis A, Jones K. Interactions among spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Distortion products and linked emissions. Hear Res 1984; 16: 271–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wier C, Pasanen E, McFadden D. Partial dissociation of spontaneous emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 230–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B, Harris F, Stagner B, Hawkins M, Martin G. Distortion-product emissions in humans: Il. Relations to stimulated and spontaneous emissions and acoustic immittance in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 236: 14–28, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Harris F. Psychoacoustical and ear canal cancellation of (2f1-f2)-distortion products. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 87: 2583–2591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris F, Probst R, Xu L. Suppression of the 2f1-f2 otoacoustic emission in humans. Hear Res 1992; 64: 133–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray P, Kemp D T. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Harris F P, Stagner B B, Hawkins M D, Martin G K. Distortion product emissions in human. I: basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 147: 3–13, (Suppl.)
   Google Scholar
• Brown A M, Kemp D T. Suppressibihty of the 2F1-F2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey P F, Allen J B. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 599–612
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfils P, Avan P, Londero A, Trotoux J, Narcy P. Objective low-frequency audiometry by distortion-product acoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 1167–1171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roede J, Harris F P, Probst R, Xu L. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology 1993; 32: 273–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfils P. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Clinical interest. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 752–756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover L, Norton S. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2670–2681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieve B, Falter S. COAEs and SSOAEs in adults with increased age. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 521–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission coch-leography–practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1985; 15: 71–96, (Suppl.)
   Google Scholar
• Brown A M, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989; 42: 143–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1587–1607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M, Lonsbury-Martin B, Martin G. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: Il. Differential physiological vulnerability. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 2662–2682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J, Leonadr G, Kim D O, Lafreniere D C, Jung M D. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 116: 1309–1316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Ohlms L A, Franklin D J, Harris F P, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Distortion product emissions in humans. III: Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 30–42, (Suppl. 47)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Avan P, Londero A, Narcy P, Trotoux J. Les produits de distorsion acoustique: technique, reproductibilité, intérèt audiométrique: une nouvelle technique ďexploration clinique de ľaudition. Ann Otolaryngol 1990; 107: 224–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonfils P, Avan P. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions–values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118: 1069–1076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N. Auditory nerve action-potential responses to clicks in man. Laryngoscope 1968; 78: 198–215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmann M, Aran J, Lug E. Electrocochleography. Laryngoscope 1971; 81: 899–910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J. Stimulus-response relations for promontory-recorded compound action potentials in normal and recruiting ears. In. Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, R Naunton. San Francisco and London, Academic Press, New York 1978; 209–219, Fernández C, (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont J, Odenthal D, Schmidt P, Spoor A. Electrocochleography–Basic principles and clinical application. Acta Otolaryng (Stockh) 1974; 316: 1–84, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• de Boer E. Synthetic whole-nerve action potentials in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 58: 1030–1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N, Moxon E. Tails of tuning curves of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 55: 620–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans E. Sound Perception in Mammals. Normal and abnormal functioning of the cochlear nerve. Academic Press, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• Evans E. The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. Audiology 1975; 14: 419–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aran J. The electrocochleogram. Recent results in children and in some pathological cases. Arch Klin Exp Ohren-, Nasen-und Kehlkopfheilk (Berlin) 1971; 198: 128–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson W, Prasher D, Kilkenny G. Diagnostic significance of trans-tympanic electrocochleography in Ménière's disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 155–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soucek S, Mason S. A study of hearing in the elderly using noninvasive electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses. J Otolaryngol 1987; 16: 345–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dallos P. The active cochlea. J Neuroscience 1992; 12: 4575–4585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libermann M, Dodds L. Single neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 1984; 16: 55–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoonhoven R, Fabius M, Grote J. Input/output curves to tone bursts and clicks in extratympanic and trans-tympanic electrocochleography. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 619–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collet L, Moulin A, Gartner M, Morgon A. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990; 99: 993–997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castor X, Veuillet E, Morgon A, Collet L. Influence of aging on active micromechanical properties and on the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Hear Res 1994; 77: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar