The Recognition Potential and Reversed Letters

References

• Adrian E. D., Matthews R. The action of light on the eye. Part I. The discharge of impulses in the optic nerve and its relation to the electric changes in the retina. Journal of Physiology (London) 1927; 63: 378–414
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andino S. L. G., Marqui R. D. P., Sosa P. A. V., Lirio R. B., Machado C., Diaz G., Rodriguez P. F., Torrez C. C. Brain electrical field measurements unaffected by linked earlobes reference. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1990; 75: 155–160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bobak P., Bodis‐Wollner I., Guillory S. The effect of blur and contrast on VEP latency: comparison between check and sinusoidal grating patterns. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1987; 68: 247–255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradshaw J., Bradley D., Patterson K. The perception and identification of mirror‐reversed patterns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1976; 28: 221–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen R. A., Waters W. F. Psychophysiological correlates of levels and stages of cognitive processing. Neuropsychologia 1985; 23: 243–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contrada R. J., Wright R. A., Glass D. C. Task difficulty, type A behavior pattern, and cardiovascular response. Psychophysiology 1984; 21: 638–646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Macadie L., Crotty A., Beale I. L. The naming of disoriented letters by normal and reading‐disabled children. Journal of Child Psychology 1985; 26: 929–938
   Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Nagourney B. A. Latency to categorize disoriented alphanumeric characters as letters or digits. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1978; 32: 186–188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis M. C., Zbrodort N. J., Shetzer L. I., Butler P. B. Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory and Cognition 1978; 6: 98–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch J. A. A system for shape recognition. Psychological Review 1962; 69: 492–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays W. L. Statistics for psychologists. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1963
   Google Scholar
• Hummel J. E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review 1992; 99: 480–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R., Keck M. Visual evoked responses as a function of grating spatial frequency. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1978; 17: 652–659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kail R. Controlled and automatic processing during mental rotation. Journal of Child Psychology 1991; 51: 337–347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lines C. R., Rugg M. D., Milner A. D. The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Experimental Brain Research 1984; 57: 89–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner P. M. A model for visual shape recognition. Psychological Review 1974; 81: 521–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez P. L. Comments on the paper by Miller, Lutzenberger and Elbert. Journal of Psychophysiology 1991; 5: 279–280
   Google Scholar
• Orton S. T. “Word‐blindness” in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 1925; 14: 581–615
   Google Scholar
• Polich J. P300 in clinical applications: Meaning, method, and measurement. American Journal of EEG Technology 1991; 31: 201–231
   Google Scholar
• Rudell A. P. The recognition potential contrasted with the P300. International Journal of Neuroscience 1991; 60: 85–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudell A. P. Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1992; 83: 77–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudell A. P., Cracco R. Q., Hassan N. F., Eberle L. P. Recognition potential: sensitivity to visual field stimulated. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993; 87: 221–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudell A. P., Hua J. Recognition potential latency and word image degradation. Brain and Language 1995; 51: 229–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudell A. P., Hua J. The recognition potential and conscious awareness. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1996; 98: 309–318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudell A. P., Hua J. The recognition potential, word difficulty, and individual reading ability: On using event‐related potentials to study perception. Journal ot Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997; 23: 1170–1195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten J. F., Bekker J. A. M. Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologies 1967; 27: 143–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiple W., Holopigian K. An examination of VEP response phase. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989; 73: 520–531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidman M., Kirk B. Letter reversals in naming, writing, and matching to sample. Child Development 1974; 45: 616–625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon J. R. The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. Stimulus‐Response Compatibility, R. W. Proctor, T. G. Reeve. Elsevier, North‐Holland 1990; 31–86
   Google Scholar
• Simon J. R., Rudell A. P. Auditory S‐R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1967; 51: 300–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simson R., Vaughan H. J., Jr., Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1977; 42: 528–535
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobimatsu S., Kurita‐Tashima S., Nakayama‐Hiromatsu M., Akazawa K., Kato M. Age‐related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size. Electroencephalography ami Clinical Neurophysiology 1993; 88: 12–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasey M. V., Thayer J. F. The continuing problem of false positives m repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. Psycho‐physiology 1987; 24: 479–486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan H. J., Jr., Costa L. D., Gilden L. The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research 1966; 6: 645–656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleger R. On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronomcin. Psychophysiology 1997; 34: 131–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White M. J. Naming and categorization of tilted alphanumeric characters do not require mental rotation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1980; 15: 153–156
   Google Scholar
• Windes J. D. Reaction time to a word in different orientations with letters rotated separately in different orientations. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1991; 72: 299–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windes J. D., Sjoberg W. G. Reaction time to normal and reflected letter‐strings in different orientations. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1987; 65: 223–227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijers A. A., Lange J. J., Mulder G., Mulder L. J. M. An ERP study of visual spatial attention and letter target detection for isoluminant and nonisoluminant stimuli. Psychophysiology 1997; 34: 553–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zusne L. Visual perception of form. Academic Press, New York 1970
   Google Scholar