Theory of Reference Values

References

• Büttner H. Fehleruntersuchungen bei klinisch-chemischen Analysen. Z. klin. Chem. 1965; 3: 69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Büttner H. Influence of quality control on reference values. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.5), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Reference Values, Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Physiology. R. Dybkâr, CopenhagenDenmark, R. Gräsbeck, Chairman (Helsinki, Finland), M. Hjelm (Uppsala, Sweden), and S. Skandsen (Molde, Norway)
   Google Scholar
• Dybkéser R. On the importance of normalizing distributions before the calculation of ‘normal ranges’ in clinical chemistry – illustrated by an example. Torben Geill on his 70th Birthday 14.8.1966, O. Z. Dalgaard, P. Hansen, V. A. Porsman, C. Petri, E. Snorrason. Danmarks Apotekerforening, Copenhagen 1966; 57–62
   Google Scholar
• Dybkâr R., Gräsbeck R., Hjelm M., Skandsen S. Summary of report from the Committee on Reference (‘Normal’) Values. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1971; 28: 23, Suppl. 118
   Google Scholar
• Dybkâr R., Jörgensen K., Nyboe J. Draft statistical terminology in clinical chemistry. Reference values. Copenhagen 1971
   Google Scholar
• Egger E. Interlaboratory establishing of reference intervals regarding sex and age. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.6), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel on Theory of Reference Values, Committee on Standards, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. R. Gräsbeck, HelsinkiFinland, E. K. Harris (Washington, D.C., USA), T. P. Whitehead, Chairman (Birmingham, UK), and G. Z. Williams (San Francisco, USA)
   Google Scholar
• Fisher R. A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers.11th ed. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London 1950
   Google Scholar
• Flynn F. V. Demographic differences. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.7), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg D. M., Winfield D. A. An investigation of biometric factors influencing the serum concentration of some commonly-determined chemical constituents in healthy subjects. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.8), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Gräsbeck R. Types of reference groups. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.2), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Gräsbeck R., Fellman J. Normal values and statistics. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1968; 21: 193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräsbeck R., Saris N.-E. Establishment and use of normal values. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 24(62), Suppl. 110
   Google Scholar
• Gullick H. D., Schauble M. K. SD unit system for standardized reporting and interpretation of laboratory data. Amer. J. clin. Path. 1972; 57: 517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris E. K., DeMets D. L. Estimation of normal ranges and cumulative proportions by transforming observed distributions to Gaussian form. Clin. Chem. 1972; 18: 605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris E. K., DeMets D. L. Effects of intra- and inter-individual variation on distributions of single measurements. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.11), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Healy M. J. R. Estimating reference values – parametric techniques. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.10), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Herrera L. The precision of percentiles in establishing normal limits in medicine. J. Lab. clin. Med. 1958; 52: 34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann R. G., Waid M. E. Standardized uses of patients' tests. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.13), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Lange H. F. The normal plasma protein values and their relative variations. Acta med. scand. 1946; 125: 109–111, Suppl. 176
   Google Scholar
• Lo J. S., Kellen J. A. A proposal for a more uniform output in laboratory data. Clin. chim. Acta 1972; 41: 239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyboe J. Distribution types and their characteristics, transformation, weeding and combining. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.9), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Richardson R. W., Setchell K. D. R., Woodman D. D. Estimation of the ‘normal range’ for serum cholesterol by different methods. Clin. chim. Acta 1972; 37: 305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor W. F. Reference intervals, nonparametric methods. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.12), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead T. P. The influence of analytical procedures on the observed distribution of reference values. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.4), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Williams G. Z. The nature and use of individual person's reference limits in clinical chemistry. Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 1972; 29(19.3), Suppl. 126
   Google Scholar
• Williams G. Z., Young D. S., Stein M. R., Cotlove E. Biological and analytic components of variation in long-term studies of serum constituents in normal subjects. I. Objectives, subject selection, laboratory procedures, and estimation of analytic deviation. Clin. Chem. 1970; 16: 1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Basic Documents23rd ed. WHO, Geneva 1973; 1
   Google Scholar