Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Volume 45, 2010 - Issue 10
Submit an article Journal homepage
361
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Gastrointestinal Cancer

Psychological distress following fecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening – a population-based study

Klaus Brasso Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Copenhagen County Hospital Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, DenmarkCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Steen Ladelund Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Copenhagen County Hospital Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
,
Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Copenhagen County Hospital Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
&
Torben Jørgensen Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Copenhagen County Hospital Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
Pages 1211-1216 | Received 24 Jan 2010, Accepted 10 Apr 2010, Published online: 06 May 2010

References

  • Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer Clin 2009;59:366–78.
  • Cancerregisteret 2004. Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen 2008:4. National Board of Health. Copenhagen; 2008. www.sst.dk.
  • Dødsårsagsregisteret 2005. Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen 2006:8. National Board of Health. Copenhagen; 2006. www.sst.dk.
  • Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 1996;348:1467–71.
  • Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472–7.
  • Boyle P, Vainio H, Smith R, Benamouzig R, Lee WC, Segnan N, Takima K. Workgroup I: criteria for screening. UICC International Workshop on facilitating screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2005;16:25–30.
  • Brodersen J, McKenna SP, Doward LC, Thorsen H. Measuring the psychosocial consequences of screening. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:3.
  • Taupin D, Chambers SL, Corbett M, Shadbolt B. Colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer improves quality of life measures: a population-based screening study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:82.
  • Miles A, Wardle J. Adverse psychological outcomes in colorectal cancer screening: does health anxiety play a role? Behav Res Ther 2006;44:1117–27.
  • Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. The SCL-90 and SCL-90R versions validated by item response models in a Danish community sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004;110:225–9.
  • Parloff MB, Kelman HC, Frank JD. Comfort, effectiveness and self-awareness as criteria of improvement in psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry 1954;5:343–51.
  • Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. Mental distress in the Danish general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006;113:477–84.
  • Kay L, Stigsby B, Brasso K, Mortensen SO, Munkgaard S. Lower urinary tract symptoms – a population survey using the Danish Prostatic Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) questionnaire. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1999;33:94–9.
  • Jorgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Thomsen TF, Ibsen H, Glumer C, Pisinger C. A randomized non-pharmacological intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease: baseline results Inter99. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2003;10:377–86.
  • Malila N, Olivanen T, Hakama M. Implementation of colorectal cancer screening in Finland: experiences from the first three years of a public health programme. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 2007;45:1–4.
  • Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:4.
  • Bangma CH, Roemeling S, Schroder FH. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer. World J Urol 2007;25:3–9.
  • Robb KA, Miles A, Campbell J, Evans P, Wardle J. Can cancer risk information raise awareness without increasing anxiety? A randomized trial. Prev Med 2006;43:187–90.
  • Brodersen J, Lunde IM. Consequences of uncertainty and overdiagnosis in screening. Ugeskr Laeger 2002;164:181–7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.