Temporary ileostomy versus colostomy for colorectal anastomosis: evidence from 12 studies

References

• Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1021–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anatomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1150–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:8–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudinskaite G, Tamelis A, Saladzinskas Z, Pavalki D. Risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage following the resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer. Medicina (Kaunas) 2005;41:741–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 2005;7:51–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MR, Hong CW, Yoon SN, Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:682–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jones OM, John SK, Horseman N, Low anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery: a single-centre study. Colorectal Dis 2007;8:740–4.
   Google Scholar
• Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi T, Fujita S, Moriya Y. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:104–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschkow R, Steffen T, Thierbach J, Bruckner T, Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2772–82.
   Google Scholar
• Suding P, Jensen E, Abramson MA, Definitive risk factors for anastomotic leaks in elective open colorectal resection. Arch Surg 2008;143:907–11.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2001;88:360–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2002;89:704–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tilney HS, Sains PS, Lovegrove RE, Reese GE, Heriot AG, Tekkis PP. Comparison of outcome following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. World J Surg 2007;3:1142–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Russell Localio A. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007;26:53–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Horton R. Bringing it all together: lancet-cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 2001;357:1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH. Defunctioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 1986;73:566–70.
   Google Scholar
• Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, Lewis AA. Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomized trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1987;69:5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:76–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I. Loop ileostomy-an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand 1980;146:203–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rutegard J, Dahlgren S. Transverse colostomy or loop ileostomy as diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Scand 1987;153:229–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001;25:274–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D. Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion. Arch Surg 2001;136:338–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2005;92:1137–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caricato M, Ausania F, Ripetti V, Bartolozzi F, Retrospective analysis of long-term defunctioning stoma complications after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2007;9:559–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebosel M, Kaemmer D, Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:431–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96:462–72.
   Google Scholar
• Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I. Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;5:CD006878.
   Google Scholar
• Amin AI, Ramalingam T, Sexton R, Comparison of transanal stent with defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2003;90:581–2.
   Google Scholar
• Patrascu T, Doran H, Musat O. Protective transanal tube in colo-rectal anastomosis. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2004;99:75–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lertsithichai P, Rattanapichart P. Temporary ileostomy versus temporary colostomy: a meta-analysis of complications. Asian J Surg 2004;27:202–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guenaga KF, Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D. Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;24:CD004647.
   Google Scholar
• Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:479–88.
   Google Scholar
• Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. Colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:650–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva MA, Ratnayake G, Deen KI. Quality of life of stoma patients: temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. World J Surg 2003;27:421–4.
   Google Scholar