Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resections for the management of small gastric adenomas with low-grade dysplasia

References

• Di Gregorio C, Morandi P, Fante R, De Gaetani C. Gastric dysplasia. A follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1714–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lauwers GY, Riddell RH. Gastric epithelial dysplasia. Gut 1999;45:784–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morson BC, Sobin LH, Grundmann E, Johansen A, Nagayo T, Serck-Hanssen A. Precancerous conditions and epithelial dysplasia in the stomach. J Clin Pathol 1980;33:711–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC, Marcos-Pinto R, Monteiro-Soares M, O’Connor A, et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy 2012;44:74–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava A, Lauwers GY. Gastric epithelial dysplasia: the Western perspective. Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:641–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lansdown M, Quirke P, Dixon MF, Axon AT, Johnston D. High grade dysplasia of the gastric mucosa: a marker for gastric carcinoma. Gut 1990;31:977–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kamiya T, Morishita T, Asakura H, Miura S, Munakata Y, Tsuchiya M. Long-term follow-up study on gastric adenoma and its relation to gastric protruded carcinoma. Cancer 1982;50:2496–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugge M, Farinati F, Baffa R, Sonego F, Di Mario F, Leandro G, et al. Gastric epithelial dysplasia in the natural history of gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Interdisciplinary Group on Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia. Gastroenterology 1994;107:1288–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinati F, Rugge M, Di Mario F, Valiante F, Baffa R. Early and advanced gastric cancer in the follow-up of moderate and severe gastric dysplasia patients. A prospective study. I.G.G.E.D.--Interdisciplinary Group on Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia. Endoscopy 1993;25:261–4.
   Google Scholar
• Park DI, Rhee PL, Kim JE, Hyun JG, Kim YH, Son HJ, et al. Risk factors suggesting malignant transformation of gastric adenoma: univariate and multivariate analysis. Endoscopy 2001;33:501–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rugge M, Nitti D, Farinati F, di Mario F, Genta RM. Non-invasive neoplasia of the stomach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;17:1191–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rugge M, Cassaro M, Di Mario F, Leo G, Leandro G, Russo VM, et al. The long term outcome of gastric non-invasive neoplasia. Gut 2003;52:1111–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada H, Ikegami M, Shimoda T, Takagi N, Maruyama M. Long-term follow-up study of gastric adenoma/dysplasia. Endoscopy 2004;36:390–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, et al. Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 2011;43:465–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Jang JY, Kim JW, Shim JJ, Lee CK, Chang YW, et al. Is lesion size an independent indication for endoscopic resection of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia? Dig Dis Sci 2014;59:428–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lim H, Jung HY, Park YS, Na HK, Ahn JY, Choi JY, et al. Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia. Surg Endosc 2014;28:1256–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SY. Gastric adenoma with low-grade dysplasia: two countries, two outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2014;59:235–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe K, Ogata S, Kawazoe S, Watanabe K, Koyama T, Kajiwara T, et al. Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors: historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:776–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, Gao Y, Mo Z, Gao F. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 2009;41:751–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotoda T, Ho KY, Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Draganov P. Gastric ESD: current status and future directions of devices and training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014;24:213–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park YM, Cho E, Kang HY, Kim JM. The effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2666–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Tateishi A, Omata M. A learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 2006;38:991–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda I, Odagaki T, Suzuki H, Nonaka S, Yoshinaga S. Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer based on trainee experience. Dig Endosc 2012;24 Suppl 1:129–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N, Ohtu A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S. New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife. Endoscopy 2001;33:221–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Ohtsu A, Baba S, et al. A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:576–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K, Satoh K, Kaneko Y, Ido K, et al. Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:507–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada M, Murakami A, Karita M, Yanai H, Okita K. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Endoscopy 1993;25:445–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo SWJr, Cleveland P, Raimondo M, Wallace MB, Woodward T. Endoscopic mucosal resection with the grasp-and-snare technique through a double-channel endoscope in humans. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:349–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue H, Endo M, Takeshita K, Yoshino K, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H. A new simplified technique of endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection using a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC). Surg Endosc 1992;6:264–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki Y, Hiraishi H, Kanke K, Watanabe H, Ueno N, Ishida M, et al. Treatment of gastric tumors by endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligating device. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:192–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lian J, Chen S, Zhang Y, Qiu F. A meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:763–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa J, Satake M, Hamabe K, Fukagawa Y, Shirai Y, Kiyotoki S, et al. Fine-tuning the criteria for strip biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection improves the outcome of early gastric carcinoma treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:1514–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Yanai H, Satake M, Okamoto T, Nishikawa J, Sakaida I, et al. Retrospective analysis of the results of strip biopsies to determine the indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2008;39:29–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, et al. Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:877–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimura T, Sasaki M, Kataoka H, Tanida S, Oshima T, Ogasawara N, et al. Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection over conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22:821–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano F, Trecca A, Rodella L, Lombardo F, Tomezzoli A, Battista S, et al. The modern treatment of early gastric cancer: our experience in an Italian cohort. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1581–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto S, Sakai Y, Kasanuki J, Kondo F, Ooka Y, Kato K, et al. Indications for the use of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer in Japan: a comparative study with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2009;41:746–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WH, Kim SW, Lim CH, Kim JS, Cho YK, Lee IS, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection using a dual-channel endoscope compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Surg Endosc 2013;27:4313–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagawa T, Takayama T, Oku T, Hayashi T, Ota H, Okamoto T, et al. Argon plasma coagulation for successful treatment of early gastric cancer with intramucosal invasion. Gut 2003;52:334–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000;47:251–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung SJ, Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kook MC, Kim CG, Lee JY, et al. Argon plasma coagulation is safe and effective for treating smaller gastric lesions with low-grade dysplasia: a comparison with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2013;27:1211–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 2001;48:225–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanai H, Matsubara Y, Kawano T, Okamoto T, Hirano A, Nakamura Y, et al. Clinical impact of strip biopsy for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:771–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Sung JK, Moon HS, Kim KS, Jung IS, Yoon BY, et al. Is endoscopic mucosal resection a sufficient treatment for low-grade gastric epithelial dysplasia? Gut Liver 2012;6:446–51.
   Google Scholar