Diagnosing toxigenic Clostridium difficile: New confidence bounds show culturing increases sensitivity of the toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay and refute gold standards

References

• McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC Jr, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, . An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2433–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Brazier JS, Suetens C, Drudy D, Wiuff C, . Update of Clostridium difficile-associated disease due to PCR ribotype 027 in Europe. Euro Surveill 2007;12:E1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Tull P. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006;12(Suppl 6):2–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijper EJ, de Weerdt J, Kato H, Kato N, van Dam AP, van der Vorm ER, . Nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea due to a clindamycin-resistant enterotoxin A-negative strain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001;20:528–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonberg RP, Schwab F, Gastmeier P. Clostridium difficile in discharged inpatients, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13:179–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planche T, Aghaizu A, Holliman R, Riley P, Poloniecki J, Breathnach A, . Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2008;8:777–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann H, Panthel K, Bader RC, Schmitt C, Schaumann R. Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;26:115–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood K, Else P, Charlett A, Wilcox M. Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:3211–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonberg RP, Kuijper EJ, Wilcox MH, Barbut F, Tull P, Gastmeier P, . Infection control measures to limit the spread of Clostridium difficile. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14(Suppl 5):2–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartlett JG, Gerding DN. Clinical recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46(Suppl 1):S12–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kist . Infektionen des Darms aus Qualit tsstandards in der mikrobiologisch-infektiologischen Diagnostik“, Heft 9/200, ISBN:3-437-41579-4 [German].
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick F, Oza A, Gilleece A, O'Byrne AM, Drudy D. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in the Republic of Ireland: a survey of Irish microbiology laboratories. J Hosp Infect 2008;68:315–21.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald LC, Owings M, Jernigan DB. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996–2003. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12: 409–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau C, Poilane I, Diakite F, Feghoul L, Cruaud P, Collignon A. [Comparison of three Clostridium difficile culture media: interest of enhancing spore germination media?] (in French). Pathol Biol (Paris) 2010;58:58–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvach EJ, Ferguson D, Riska PF, Landry ML. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:109–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noren T, Alriksson I, Andersson J, Akerlund T, Unemo M. Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:710–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson AM, Fung AM, Fang FC. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:124–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg RJ, Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet LS, Gerritsen HJ, Endtz HP, van der Vorm ER, Kuijper EJ. Prospective multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay and real-time PCR for rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:5338–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepe MS. The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Litvin M, Reske KA, Mayfield J, McMullen KM, Georgantopoulos P, Copper S, . Identification of a pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and the effect of repeated testing, sensitivity, and specificity on perceived prevalence of CDI. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:1166–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan J, Murphy C, Twomey C, Paul Ross R, Rea MC, MacSharry J, . Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile in an Irish continuing care institution for the elderly: prevalence and characteristics. Ir J Med Sci 2010;179: 245–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau C, Lemee L, Le Monnier A, Poilane I, Pons JL, Collignon A. Prevalence and diversity of Clostridium difficile strains in infants. J Med Microbiol 2011;60(Pt 8):1112–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattner F, Mattner L. Confidence bounds for the sensitivity lack of a less specific diagnostic test, without gold standard. Metrika. 2012; in press: DOI 10.1007/s00184-012-0385-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gart JJ, Buck AA. Comparison of a screening test and a reference test in epidemiologic studies II. A probabilistic model for the comparison of diagnostic tests. Am J Epidemiol 1966;83:593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd CJ, Moldovan MV. Exact one-sided confidence limits for the difference between two correlated proportions. Stat Med 2007;26:3369–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmee M. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7:411–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM, Cai M, Ross TL, Speck KA, . Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2007; 45:3601–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamper PD, Alcabasa R, Aird D, Babiker W, Wehrlin J, Ikpeama I, . Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:373–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doing KM, Hintz MS, Keefe C, Horne S, LeVasseur S, Kulikowski ML. Reevaluation of the premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2010;66:129–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altindis M, Usluer S, Ciftci H, Tunc N, Cetinkaya Z, Aktepe OC. [Investigation of the presence of Clostridium difficile in antibiotic associated diarrhea patients by culture and toxin detection methods]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2007;41:29–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson TL, McGregor A. Evaluation of the Clearview Clostridium difficile Toxin A Test and various selective culture media in comparison with the cytotoxin assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Pathology 2003;35:244–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner L, Widmer AF, Goy G, Rudin S, Frei R. Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:328–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcala L, Sanchez-Cambronero L, Catalan MP, Sanchez-Somolinos M, Pelaez MT, Marin M, . Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:3833–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak-Weekley SM, Marlowe EM, Miller JM, Cumpio J, Nomura JH, Vance PH, . Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:889–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reller ME, Alcabasa RC, Lema CA, Carroll KC. Comparison of two rapid assays for Clostridium difficile common antigen and a C. difficile toxin A/B assay with the cell culture neutralization assay. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:107–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroyo LG, Rousseau J, Willey BM, Low DE, Staempfli H, McGeer A, . Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:5341–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederen BM, Verbakel H, Bergmans A, Peeters MF. Evaluation of two immunochromatographic tests (ImmunoCard Toxins A&B, Xpect C. difficile Toxin A&B) and PCR for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in faecal samples. J Infect 2007;54:e251–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SD, Turgeon DK, Ko CW, Fritsche TR, Surawicz CM. Clinical correlation of toxin and common antigen enzyme immunoassay testing in patients with Clostridium difficile disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1569–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miendje Deyi VY, Vandenberg O, Mascart G, Gning S, Retore P, Douat N, . Diagnostic value of five commercial tests for the rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Clin Lab 2008;54:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar