Improving measurement of injection drug risk behavior using item response theory

References

• Wodak A, Cooney A. Do needle syringe programs reduce HIV infection among injecting drug users: a comprehensive review of the international evidence. Substance Use Misuse 2006;41:777–813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, Ziebell R, Green T, Walker F, Lin LS, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PloS one 2011;6:e17502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amon JJ, Garfein RS, Ahdieh-Grant L, Armstrong GL, Ouellet LJ, Latka MH, Vlahov D, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among injection drug users in the United States, 1994–2004. Clin Infect Dis (Chicago) 2008;46:1852–1858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson PK, Mathers BM, Cowie B, Hagan H, Des Jarlais D, Horyniak D, Degenhardt L. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in people who inject drugs: results of systematic reviews. Lancet 2011;378:571–583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan H, Pouget ER, Des Jarlais DC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to prevent hepatitis C virus infection in people who inject drugs. J Infect Dis 2011;204:74–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmateer N, Kimber J, Hickman M, Hutchinson S, Rhodes T, Goldberg D. Evidence for the effectiveness of sterile injecting equipment provision in preventing hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus transmission among injecting drug users: a review of reviews. Addiction 2010;105:844–859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paintsil E, He H, Peters C, Lindenbach BD, Heimer R. Survival of hepatitis C virus in syringes: implication for transmission among injection drug users. J Infect Dis 2010;202:984–990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghoe MC, Wodak A. Health and social consequences of injecting drug use. In: Bell A, Des Jarlais DC, Stimson GV, eds. Drug injecting and HIV infection: global dimensions and local responses. London: UCL Press 1998, pp. 42--57
   Google Scholar
• Mehta SH, Astemborski J, Kirk GD, Strathdee SA, Nelson KE, Vlahov D, Thomas DL. Changes in blood-borne infection risk among injection drug users. J Infect Dis 2011;203:587–594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fendrich M, Smith EV, Pollack LM, Mackesy-Amiti ME. Measuring sexual risk for HIV: a Rasch scaling approach. Arch Sex Behav 2009;38:922–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland GM, Teplin LA, Abram KM, Jacobs N. HIV and AIDS risk behaviors among female jail detainees: implications for public health policy. Am J Public Health 2002;92:818–825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Liu H, Feng T, Cai Y. Psychometric assessment of HIV/STI sexual risk scale among MSM: a Rasch model approach. BMC Public Health 2011;11:763–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman SG, Latkin C, Gielen AC. Social factors related to syringe sharing among injecting partners: a focus on gender. Substance Use Misuse 2001;36:2113–2136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MJL, Hahn JA, Page-Shafer MK, Lum MPJ, Stein MES, Davidson MPJ, Moss AR. Gender differences in sexual and injection risk behavior among active young injection drug users in San Francisco (the UFO Study). J Urban Health 2003;80:137–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Jarlais DC, Feelemyer JP, Modi SN, Arasteh K, Hagan H. Are females who inject drugs at higher risk for HIV infection than males who inject drugs: an international systematic review of high seroprevalence areas. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012;124:95–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JL, Hahn JA, Page-Shafer K, Lum PJ, Stein ES, Davidson PJ, Moss AR. Gender differences in sexual and injection risk behavior among active young injection drug users in San Francisco (the UFO study). J Urban Health 2003;80:137–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Res Meth 2000;3:4–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter D, Elizabeth C, Rhodes AG, Taxman FS, Daniel JOC, Linda KF, William MB, et al. Collaborative behavioral management for drug-involved parolees: rationale and design of the Step'n Out Study. J Offender Rehab 2008;47:290–318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leukefeld C. Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ-DATS): Restructuring Risky Relationships-HIV (RRR-HIV), 2005–2008 [United States]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor], 2011
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi JA, Martin SS, O’Connell DJ, Surratt HL. HIV/hepatitis prevention for re-entering offenders: Brief Report Series 2007;1--5
   Google Scholar
• Frisman L, Prendergast M, Lin HJ, Rodis E, Greenwell L. Applying classification and regression tree analysis to identify prisoners with high HIV risk behaviors. J Psychoactive Drugs 2008;40:447–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho LM, Bartholomew NG, Joe GW, Simpson DD. Maintenance of HIV risk reduction among injection opioid users: a 12 month posttreatment follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997;47:11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of H, Human Services. Substance A, Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health S, Quality. National Survey on Drug Use and Health: 2-Year R-DAS (2002 to 2003, 2004 to 2005, 2006 to 2007, 2008 to 2009, and 2010 to 2011). Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor], 2013
   Google Scholar
• RDevelopmentCoreTeam. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Rizopoulos D. ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J Statistical Software 2006;17:1–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magis D, Béland S, Tuerlinckx F, De Boeck P. A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning. Behav Res Meth 2010;42:847–862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai L, du Toit S, Thissen D. IRTPRO: user guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Paek I, Han KT. IRTPRO 2.1 for Windows (Item Response Theory for Patient-Reported Outcomes). Applied Psychological Measurement 2012
   Google Scholar
• Embretson SE, Reise SP. Binary IRT Models. In: Embretson SE, Reise SP, eds. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000;Vol. 4, 65–94
   Google Scholar
• Drasgow F, Lissak RI. Modified parallel analysis: a procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item responses. J Appl Psychol 1983;68:363–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenisky AL, Hambleton RK, Sired SG. Identification and evaluation of local item dependencies in the Medical College Admissions Test. J Educational Measurement 2002;39:291–309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warne RT, McKyer E, Smith ML. An introduction to item response theory for health behavior researchers. Am J Health Behav 2012;36:31–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item Response Theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F. Examining the effects of differential item (functioning and differential) test functioning on selection decisions: when are statistically significant effects practically important? J Appl Psychol 2004;89:497–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magis D, Raîche G, Béland S, Gérard P. A generalized logistic regression procedure to detect differential item functioning among multiple groups. Int J Testing 2011;11:365–386
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo MD, López-Pina JÉA. Differential item functioning detection and effect size: a comparison between logistic regression and Mantel-Haenszel procedures. Educational Psychological Measurement 2004;64:903–915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WH, Thissen D. Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. J Educational Behav Stat 1997;22:265–289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jodoin MG, Gierl MJ. Evaluating Type I error and power rates using an effect size measure with the logistic regression procedure for DIF detection. Appl Measurement Education 2001;14:329–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frajzyngier V, Neaigus A, Gyarmathy VA, Miller M, Friedman SR. Gender differences in injection risk behaviors at the first injection episode. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;89:145–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MD, Oshima T. Effect of sample size, number of biased items, and magnitude of bias on a two-stage item bias. Appl Psychological Measurement 1992;16:381–388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, De Graeff A, Groenvold M, Gundy C, et al. A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:288–295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar