Effectiveness of interventions for convicted DUI offenders in reducing recidivism: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed scientific literature

References

• World Health Organisation (WHO). Alcohol and injuries: Emergency department studies in an international perspective. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health 2009:41–51
   Google Scholar
• Impinen A, Rahkonen O, Karjalainen K, Lintonen T, Lillsunde P, Ostamo A. Substance use as a predictor of driving under the influence (DUI) rearrests. A 15-year retrospective study. Traffic Inj Prevent 2009;10:220–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marowitz LA. Predicting DUI recidivism: Blood alcohol concentration and driver record factors. Accident Analysis Prevent 1998;30:545–554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Williford WR. Drunk-driving recidivism: predicting factors from arrest context and case disposition. J Stud Alcohol 1995;56:60–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeYoung DJ. An evaluation of the implementation of ignition interlock in California. J Safety Res 2002;33:473–482
   Google Scholar
• Nochajski TH, Stasiewicz PR. Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): a review. Clin Psychol Rev 2006;26:179–195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders. Addiction 1995;90:907–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Alao MO, Carande-Kulis VG, Zaza S, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prevent Med 2001;21:66–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shults RA, Elder RW, Nichols JL, Sleet DA, Comptom R, Chattopadhyay SK. Effectiveness of multicomponent programs with community mobilization for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prevent Med 2009;37:360–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264–269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman LW, Gottfredson DC, MacKenzie DL, Eck J, Reuter P, Bushway SD. Preventing crime: what works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Reeves B, Deeks J, Higgins J, Wells G. Chapter 13: Including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2008:390–432
   Google Scholar
• Finney JW, Moyer A. Meta-analysis: summarising findings on addiction intervention effects. In: Miller PG, Strang J, Miller PM, editors. Addiction research methods. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:319–336
   Google Scholar
• Moore KA, Harrison M, Young MS, Ochshorn E. A cognitive therapy treatment program for repeat DUI offenders. J Criminal Just 2008;36:539–545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliszowski CH, Fell JC, McKnight AS, Tippetts AS, Ciccel JD. An evaluation of Three intensive supervision programs for serious DWI offenders. Ann Adv Automot Med 2010;54:375–387
   Google Scholar
• Beirness DJ, Marques PR. Alcohol ignition interlock programs. Traffic Inj Prevent 2004;5:299–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rauch W, Ahlin E, Zador P, Howard J, Duncan G. Effects of administrative ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses. J Experim Criminol 2011;7:127–148
   Google Scholar
• Bjerre B, Thorsson U. Is an alcohol ignition interlock programme a useful tool for changing the alcohol and driving habits of drink-drivers? Accident Analysis Prevent 2008;40:267–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth R, Voas R, Marques P. Interlocks for first offenders: effective? Traffic Inj Prevent 2007;8:346–352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjerre B. Primary and secondary prevention of drink driving by the use of alcolock device and program: Swedish experiences. Accident Analysis Prevent 2005;37:1145–1152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raub RA, Lucke RE, Wark RI. Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: controlling the recidivist. Traffic Inj Prevent 2003;4:28–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voas RB, Marques PR, Tippetts AS, Beirness DJ. The Alberta Interlock Program: the evaluation of a province-wide program on DUI recidivism. Addiction 1999;94:1849–1859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrath M. The Ignition interlock program for drunk drivers: a multivariate test. Crime Delinquency 1997;43:42–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck KH, Rauch WJ, Baker EA, Williams AF. Effects of ignition interlock license restrictions on drivers with multiple alcohol offenses: a randomized trial in Maryland. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1696–1700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beirness DJ, Marques PR, Voas RB, Tippetts AS. The impact of mandatory versus voluntary participation in the alberta ignition interlock program. Traffic Inj Prevent 2003;4:195–198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth R, Voas R, Marques P. Mandating interlocks for fully revoked offenders: the New Mexico experience. Traffic Inj Prevent 2007;8:20–25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjerre B. An evaluation of the Swedish ignition interlock program. Traffic Inj Prevent 2003;4:17–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wells-Parker E, Williams M. Enhancing the effectiveness of traditional interventions with drinking drivers by adding brief individual intervention components. J Stud Alcohol 2002;63:655–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson AA, Gardner S, Xu X, Costello H. The impact of remedial intervention on 3-year recidivism among first-time DUI offenders in Mississippi. Accident Analysis Prevent 2009;41:1080–1086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekeh AP, Hamilton SB, D’Souza C, Everrett E, McCarthy MC. Long-term evaluation of a trauma center-based juvenile driving intervention program. J Trauma 2011;71:223–226; discussion 226–227
   Google Scholar
• Mills KL, Hodge W, Johansson K, Conigrave KM. An outcome evaluation of the New South Wales Sober Driver Programme: a remedial programme for recidivist drink drivers. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008;27:65–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider R, Voas RB, Kelley-Baker T, Grosz M, Murphy B. Preventing alcohol-related convictions: the effect of a novel curriculum for first-time offenders on DUI recidivism. Traffic Inj Prevent 2007;8:147–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams DJ, Simmons P, Thomas A. Predicting DUI recidivism following an alcohol safety action program. J Offender Rehabil 2000;32:129–145
   Google Scholar
• Deyoung DJ. An evaluation of the effectiveness of alcohol treatment, driver license actions and jail terms in reducing drunk driving recidivism in California. Addiction 1997;92:989–997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C’De Baca J, Lapham SC, Paine S, Skipper BJ. Victim impact panels: who is sentenced to attend? Does attendance affect recidivism of first-time DWI offenders? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000;24:1420–1426
   Google Scholar
• Crew BK, Johnson SE. Do victim impact programs reduce recidivism for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated? Findings from an outcomes evaluation. Crim Just Stud 2011;24:153–163
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler DR, Rogers EM, Tonigan JS, Woodall WG. Effectiveness of customized Victim Impact Panels on first-time DWI offender inmates. Accident Analysis Prevent 2004;36:29–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojek DG, Coverdill JE, Fors SW. The effect of victim impact panels on DUI rearrest rates: a five-year follow-up. Criminology 2003;41:1319–1340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar D, Comptom RP. Victim Impact Panels: their impact on DWI recidivism. Alcohol, Drugs Driving 1995;11:73–87
   Google Scholar
• Sprang G. Victim impact panels. J Soc Serv Res 1997;22:73–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fors SW, Rojek DG. The effect of victim impact panels on DUI/DWI rearrest rates: a twelve-month follow-up. J Stud Alcohol 1999;60:514–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C’De Baca J, Lapham SC, Liang HC, Skipper BJ. Victim impact panels: do they impact drunk drivers? A follow-up of female and male, first-time and repeat offenders. J Stud Alcohol 2001;62:615–620
   Google Scholar
• Warchol GL. Intensive supervision probation: an impact evaluation. Justice Professional 2000;13:219--232
   Google Scholar
• Lapham SC, Kapitula LR, C’de Baca J, McMillan GP. Impaired-driving recidivism among repeat offenders following an intensive court-based intervention. Accident Analysis Prevent 2006;38:162–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham SC, C’De Baca J, Lapidus J, McMillan GP. Randomized sanctions to reduce re-offense among repeat impaired-driving offenders. Addiction 2007;102:1618–1625
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald JM, Morral AR, Raymond B, Eibner C. The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI court: a 2-year field experiment. Evaluat Rev 2007;31:4–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard JA, Richardson KA, Franklin T. Drug courts for DWI offenders? The effectiveness of two hybrid drug courts on DWI offenders. J Crim Justice 2010;38:25--33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JC, Tippetts AS, Ciccel JD. An evaluation of three driving-under-the-influence courts in Georgia. Ann Adv Automot Med 2011;55:301–312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronan SM, Collins PA, Rosky JW. The effectiveness of Idaho DUI and misdemeanor/DUI courts: outcome evaluation. J Offender Rehabil 2009;48:154–165
   Google Scholar
• Courtright KE, Berg BL, Mutchnick RJ. Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders. J Offender Rehabil 1997;24:35–51
   Google Scholar
• Yu J. Punishment celerity and severity: testing a specific deterrence model on drunk driving recidivism. J Crim Justice 1994;22:355–366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimet MC, Dongier M, Di Leo I, Legault L, Tremblay J, Chanut F, Brown TG. A randomized controlled trial of brief motivational interviewing in impaired driving recidivists: a 5-year follow-up of traffic offenses and crashes. Alcoholism 2013;37:1979–1985
   Google Scholar
• Utter GH, Young JB, Theard LA, Cropp DM, Mhoar CJ, Eisenberg D, Schermer CR, Owens LJ. The effect of problematic drinking behaviour of a brief motivational interview shortly after a first arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol: a randomized trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;76:661–671
   Google Scholar
• Schermer CR, Moyers TB, Miller WR, Bloomfield LA. Trauma center brief interventions for alcohol disorders decrease subsequent driving under the influence arrests. J Trauma 2006;60:29–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucker GW, Osti JR. Reduced recidivism among first-time DWI offenders as a correlate of pre-trial intervention. J Offender Rehabil 1997;24:1–17
   Google Scholar
• Weinrath M, Gartrell J. Specific deterrence and sentence length: the case of drunk drivers. J Contemp Crim Just 2001;17:105–122
   Google Scholar
• Kilmer B, Nicosia N, Heaton P, Midgette G. Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: insights from South Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Project. Am J Public Health 2013;103:e37–e43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delaney HD, Kunitz SJ, Hongwei Z, Woodall WG, Westerberg V, Rogers E, Wheeler DR. Variations in jail sentences and the probability of re-arrest for driving while intoxicated. Traffic Inj Prevent 2005;6:105–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar