The Effects of Skills and Intentions to Use Drugs on Posttreatment Drug Use of Adolescents

References

• Feindler E. L., Marriott S. A., Iwata M. Group anger control training for junior high school delinquents. Cognit. Ther. Res 1984; 8: 299–311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick B., Goldstein A. P. Aggression replacement training. J. Couns. Dev 1987; 65: 356–362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J. D., Catalano R. F., Wells E. A. Measuring effects of a skills training intervention for drug abusers. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 1986; 54: 661–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J. D., et al. Effects of a skills training intervention with juvenile delinquents. Res. Soc. Work Practice 1991; 1: 107–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdelle D. A., St Lawrence J. S. Adolescent interpersonal problem‐solving skill training: Social validation and generalization. Behav. Ther 1988; 19: 171–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney E. F., O'Leary M. R., Marlatt G. A. Skill training with alcoholics. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 1978; 46: 1092–1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S. L., Lanyon R. I. Relationship between adaptive skills and outcomes of alcoholism‐treatment. J. Stud. Alcohol 1981; 42: 521–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells E. A., et al. General vs. drug‐specific coping skills and posttreatment drug use among adults. Psychol. Addict. Behav 1989; 3: 9–21
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins J. D., et al. Skills training for drug abusers: Generalization, maintenance, and effects on drug use. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 1989; 57: 559–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells E. A., et al. A Social Development Approach to Aftercare for Delinquent Adolescents: A Comparison with Standard Institution and Parole Services. Social Development Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 1990, Unpublished Manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Catalano R. F., Hawkins J. D. The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. Some Current Theories of Crime and Delinquency, J. D. Hawkins. Sage, Newbury Park, California, In Press
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins J. D., Weis J. G. The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. J. Primary Prev 1985; 6: 73–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschi T. Causes of Delinquency. University of California Press, Berkeley, California 1969
   Google Scholar
• , Half of the subjects were exposed to an experimental treatment program aimed at increasing skill levels. Results of this program have been described elsewhere ‘4, 10’. The focus of this report is the relationship of skill levels, intentions to use drugs and alcohol, and drug use outcomes. Combining experimental and control groups in this analysis has the advantage of increasing variation in the skill and intentions variables, thereby permitting detection of any relationships that might exist among these variables and drug outcomes. If little or no variation in skill or intentions measures is present naturally in the population chosen for study, the effects of these variables on drug use cannot be detected. However, enhancing the variation in skill and intentions measures artificially through experiments may allow the investigator to detect an effect that was dormant due to the limited variation of naturally occurring skills and intentions in the drug‐abusing population under study. In these analyses we are not concerned with what produced the variation in skills or intentions. We are concerned here with the question of the extent to which skills and intentions are related to outcomes following treatment
   Google Scholar
• Freedman B. J., et al. A social‐behavioral analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent boys. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 1978; 49: 959–967
   Google Scholar
• Wells E. A. Alcohol and Drug Use among Adolescents: Assessing Behavioral Competence. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 1984, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Wells E. A., Hawkins J. D., Catalano R. F. Choosing drug use measures for treatment outcome studies: I. The influence of measurement approach on treatment results. Int. J. Addict 1988; 23: 851–873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala G. S. Limited‐Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, New York 1983
   Google Scholar
• , For males, the total effect of self‐control skills on drug use is –.05 +.38 * (–.09) = –.08. The direct effect is –.05, while the indirect effect is –.03. The indirect effect of self‐control skills accounts for 38% of the total effect. The total effect of drug avoidance skills on drug use is –.10 +. 35 * (–.18) = –.16. The direct effect is –.10, while the indirect effect is –.06. The indirect effect of drug avoidance skills accounts for 38% of the total effect
   Google Scholar
• , For females, the total effect of self‐control skills on drug use is –.25 +. 58 * (.04) = –.23. The direct effect is –.25, while the indirect effect is –.02. The indirect effect of self‐control skills accounts for 9% of the total effect. The total effect of drug avoidance skills on drug use is –.18 +. 47 * (–.07) =. 21. The direct effect is –.18, while the indirect effect is –.03. The indirect effect of drug avoidance skills accounts for 5% of the total effect
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Azjen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts 1975
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am. Psychol 1989; 44: 1175–1184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomberg E. S. L. Drinking patterns of women alcoholics. Women Who Drink, V. Burtle. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1979
   Google Scholar
• Wilsnack S. C., Beckman L. J. Alcohol Problems in Women: Antecedents, Consequences, and Intervention. Guilford, New York 1984
   Google Scholar