The Value of Some Suprathreshold Auditory Measures

References

• Bangs J. L., Mullins C. J. Recruitment testing and its implications. Arch Otolaryng (Chicago) 1953; 58: 582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. The use of uncomfortable loudness level in hearing aid fitting. MAICO Audiological library 1976; 2, series, no. 15
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W., Lowry J. F. Relationships between various stimuli for MCL. Sound 1971; 5: 11
   Google Scholar
• Chiveralls K., Fitzsimmons R. Stapedial reflex action in normal subjects. Brit J Audiol 1973; 7: 105
   Google Scholar
• Chiveralls K., Fitzsimmons R., Beck G. B., Kernohan H. The diagnostic significance of the acoustic reflex. Brit J Audiol 1976; 10: 122
   Google Scholar
• Clack T. D., Bess F. H. Aural harmonics: the tone-on-tone masking vs the best beat method in normal and abnormal listeners. Acta Otolaryng (Stockholm) 1969; 67: 399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver V. C. G. The Effects of the Mental Set on the Acoustic Reflex. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Southampton. 1974
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran A. L. Eye Closure, Muscle Tonus and the Acoustic Reflex. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Southampton. 1976
   Google Scholar
• Draf W., Leitner H. Klinischer Vergleich von Impedanzmessung und anderen Recruitmentprüfmethoden. Z Laryng Rhinol Otol 1972; 51: 700
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esser G., Schunicht R. Objective Bestimmung der Hörschwelle mit Hilfe der Stapedius Reflex Audiometrie. Arch Klin Exp Ohr Nas Kehlkopfheilk 1972; 202: 477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher H. A space-time pattern theory of hearing. J Acoust Soc Amer 1930; 1: 311
   Google Scholar
• French ST, George M. Acoustic Reflex Measures of Cochlear Damage. M.Sc. dissertation, University of Southampton. 1976
   Google Scholar
• Fuller H., Stephens S. D. G. Experimental studies on the comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels. Brit J Audiol 1977, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Grimm D. M., Bess F. H. The threshold of octave masking (TOM) test. Acta Otolaryng (Stockholm) 1973; 76: 419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. Examen otoneurologique pour le diagnostic des neurinomes acoustiques. Aata Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1971; 27: 770
   Google Scholar
• Hood J. D., Poole J. P. Tolerable limit of loudness: its clinical and physiological significance. J Acoust Soc Amer 1966; 40: 47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S. Diagnostic value of Békésy comfortable loudness tracings. Arch Otolaryng (Chicago) 1974; 99: 351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S. A simplified tone decay test. Arch Otolaryng (Chicago) 1975; 102: 403
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen N. J., Osterhammel D., Terkildsen K., Osterhammel P., Huis in't Veld F. The white noise middle ear muscle reflex threshold with sensorineural hearing impairment. Scand Audiol 1976; 5: 131
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh J. F. An Investigation of the Most Comfortable Listening Level for Speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin. 1960
   Google Scholar
• Keller F. Hörgeräteanspassung in Klinischer Sicht. 1971, Report, Universitätsklinik HNO Freiburg
   Google Scholar
• Kopra L. L., Blosser D. Effects of method of measurement on most comfortable loudness level for speech. J Speech Hearing Res 1968; 11: 497
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence M., Blanchard C. Prediction of susceptibility to acoustic trauma by determination of threshold of distortion. Industr Med Surg 1954; 23: 193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence M., Yantis P. A. Thresholds of overload in normal and pathological ears. Arch Otolaryng (Chicago) 1956; 63: 67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftiss E. W. An Evaluation of the Effects of Selected Psychophysical Methods of Connected Speech. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois. 1964
   Google Scholar
• Lundborg T., Linzander S., Rosenhamer H., Lindström B., Svärd I., Fransson A. Experience with hearing aids in adults. Scand Audiol 1973; 3(Suppl 9)
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M. E., Martin A. M. The variability of acoustic reflex threshold measurements. J Sound Vibration 1976; 48: 413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M. E., Martin A. M. The acoustic reflex threshold for impulses. J Sound Vibration 1977; 51: 97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCandless G. Hearing aids and loudness discomfort. Oticongress 1973; 3: 29
   Google Scholar
• Melnick W. Comfortable level and loudness matching of continuous and interrupted signals. J Speech Hearing Res 1967; 10: 99
   Google Scholar
• Metz O. The acoustic impedance measured in normal and pathological ears. Acta Otolaryng (Stockholm) 1946; 63(Suppl)
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D. E., Dirks D. D. Loudness discomfort level under earphone and in the free field: the effects of calibration methods. J Acoustical Soc Amer 1974; 56: 172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D. E., Wilson R. H., Dirks D. D. Loudness discomfort level: Selected methods and stimuli. J Acoust Soc Amer 1974; 56: 577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D. A., Bilger R. C. Pure-tone octave masking in normal-hearing listeners. J Speech Hearing Res 1974a; 17: 223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson D. A., Bilger R. C. Pure-tone octave masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hearing Res 1974b; 17: 252
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niemeyer W. Relations between the discomfort level and the reflex threshold of the middle ear muscles. Audiology 1971; 10: 172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris D. W., Taylor D. J. A Comparison of Simultaneous Ipsilateral-Contralateral Acoustic Reflex Recordings. Paper presented at 50th Conference of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Washington, DC, 1975
   Google Scholar
• Olsen W. O., Noffsinger D., Kurdziel S. Acoustic reflex and reflex decay. Arch Otolaryng (Chicago) 1975; 101: 622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opheim O., Flottorp G. The aural harmonics in normal and pathological hearing. Acta Otolaryng (Stockholm) 1955; 45: 513
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson J. L., Lidén G. Some static characteristics of the stapedial muscle reflex. Audiology 1972; 11: 97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollack I. Comfortable listening levels for pure tones in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Amer 1952; 24: 158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priede V. M., Coles R. R. A. Factors influencing the loudness discomfort level. Sound 1971; 5: 39
   Google Scholar
• Richards A. M. Most comfortable loudness levels for pure tones and speech in the presence of masking noise. J Speech Hearing Res 1975; 18: 498
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rintelmann W. F., Carhart R. Loudness tracking by normal hearers via Békésy audiometer. J Speech Hearing Res 1964; 7: 79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G., Anderson C. M. B. Experimental studies on the uncomfortable loudness level. J Speech Hearing Res 1971; 14: 262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens S. D. G., Blegvad B., Krogh H. J. Eye closure and the acoustic reflex threshold. Amer Audiol 1977; 3: 88
   Google Scholar
• Terkildsen K., Osterhammel P., Scott-Nielsen S. Impedance measurements. Pure tone intensity and middle ear reflexes. Acta Otolaryng (Stockholm) 1970; 263: 205, Suppl
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen J., Terkildsen K. Audiological findings in 125 cases of acoustic neuromas. Acta Otolaryng (Stockholm) 1975; 80: 353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventry I. M., Woods R. W., Rubin M., Hill W. Most comfortable loudness level for pure tones, noise and speech. J Acoust Soc Amer 1971; 49: 1805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson L. A. Certain fundamental principles in prescribing and fitting hearing aids. Laryngoscope (St. Louis) 1944; 54: 531
   Google Scholar