Physical Characteristics of Gunfire Impulse Noise and its Attenuation by Hearing Protectors

References

• American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO). Guide for conservation of hearing in noise. Custom Print, Rochester 1983
   Google Scholar
• Air Force. Hazardous noise exposure. Air Force, Washington, D.C. 1982, AFR 161–35
   Google Scholar
• Anttonen H, Hassi J, Riihikangas P, Sorri M. The impulse noise exposure during military service. Scand Audiol 1980; 9(Suppl. 12)17–24
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics (CHABA). Proposed damage-risk criteria for impulse noise (gunfire). National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 1968, Rep. 57
   Google Scholar
• Chung D Y, Hardie R, Cannon R P. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry. J Occcup Med 1983; 25: 679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coles R RA, Garinther G R, Hodge D C, Rice C G. Hazardous exposure to impulse noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 43: 336–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancer A, Grateau P, Cabanis A, Barnabe G, Cagnin G, Vaillant T, et al. Effectiveness of earplugs in high-intensity impulse noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1677–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Information on levels of environmental noise requisite to protect public health and wellfare with an adequate margin of safety. EPA, Washington, D.C. 1974, Rep Nr 550/9–74–004
   Google Scholar
• Hodge D C, Gates H W, Helm C P, Söderholm R B, Blackmer R F. Preliminary studies of the impulse-noise effects on human hearing. US Army Human Engineering Laboratory, Aberdeen 1964, Technical Memo 15
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Subjective method for the measurement of sound attenuation. ISO, Geneva 1990; 7, (ISO 4869–1 Acoustics-Hearing protectors)
   Google Scholar
• Kryter K D, Garinther G R. Auditory effects of acoustic impulses from firearms. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1965, (Suppl. 211)
   Google Scholar
• Liu C-C, Pekkarinen J, Starck J. Application of the probe microphone method to measure attenuation of hearing protectors against high impulse sound levels. Appl Acoustics 1989; 27: 13–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin A M. An investigation of the relationships between the attenuation of earplugs and earmuffs with incident sound level for steady-state and impulse sounds using instrumented cadaver ears. University of Southampton, Southampton 1977; 37, Tech Rep No 95. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research
   Google Scholar
• McRobert H, Ward W D. Damage-risk criteria: the trading relation between intensity and the number of non-verberant impulses. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53: 1297–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA). Occupational Noise Exposure; hearing conservation amendment; final rule. Federal Register, Washington, o.c. 1983; 48: 9737–85
   Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen J, Starck J. Digital high-speed sampling of combined exposure to noise and vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 1986; 12: 327–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen J. Exposure to impulse noise, hearing protection and combined risk factors in the development of sensory neural hearing loss. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kuopio, Kuopio 1989, Publ Univ Kuopio 1989/4
   Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen J, Starck J, Ylikoski J. Hearing protectors against high level shooting impulses in relation to hearing damage criteria. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 196–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfander F, Bongartz H, Brinkman H, Kietz H. Danger of auditory impairment from impulse noise: a comparative study of the CHABA damage risk criteria and those of the Federal Republic of Germany. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 628–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Hearing losses induced by small arms. Int Audiol 1967; 6: 31–6
   Google Scholar
• Price G R. Rating the hazard from intense sounds: putting theory into practice. Scand Audiol 1982; 11(Suppl. 16)111–21
   Google Scholar
• Price G R. Relative hazard of weapon impulses. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 556–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price G R. Hazard from intense low-frequency acoustic impulses. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 80: 1076–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pääkkönen R. Low-frequency impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors and other technical means. Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere 1993, Publications 117
   Google Scholar
• Riihikangas P, Anttonen H, Hassi J, Sorri M. Hearing loss and impulse noise during military service. Scand Audiol 1980; 9(Suppl. 12)292–7
   Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G F, Mimpen T M. Assessment of personal hearing protection in practice. Scand Audiol 1982; 11(Suppl. 16)13–22
   Google Scholar
• Spoendlin H. Histopathology of noise deafness. J Otolaryngol 1985; 14: 282–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starck J, Pekkarinen J, Aatola S. Attenuation of earmuffs against low frequency noise. J Low Freq Noise and Vibr 1987; 6: 167–74
   Google Scholar
• Starck J, Pekkarinen J. (1992) Objective measurement of hearing protector attenuation for weapon's noise exposure. Hearing conservation conference. 1.-4.4. 1992. University of Kentucky, Lexington, 89
   Google Scholar
• Ylikoski J S, Pekkarinen J O, Starck J P. The efficiency of earmuffs against intense impulse noise. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 85–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylikoski M E, Ylikoski J S. Hearing loss and handicap of professional soldiers exposed to gunfire noise. Scand J Work Environ Health 1994; 20: 87–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar