References
- Acharya C. Enhancing learning in a large-class session: Some issues. CDTL Brief 2001; 4: 8–9
- Amin Z, Seng C, Eng K. Multiple choice questions (MCQ). Practical Guide to Medical Student Assessment. World Scientifc Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, Singapore 2006
- Barber M, Njus D. Clicker evolution: Seeking intelligent design. CBE Life Sci Educ 2007; 6: 1–8
- Bell D, Harless C, Higa J, Bjork E, Bjork R, Bazarquan M, Mangione C. Knowledge retention after an online tutorial: A randomized educational experiment among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 32: 1164–1171
- Bruneau M, Langevin L. L'enseignement aux grands groupes: Quelques balises pour la pratique ou mieux les comprendre pour mieux les gérer. 2003
- Caldwell JE. Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ 2007; 6: 9–20
- Chan E. Motivation for mandatory courses. CDTL Brief 2004; 7: 1–5
- Eggert CH, West CP, Thomas KG. Impact of an audience response system. Med Educ 2004; 38: 576
- Gibbs G, Jenkins A. Teaching large classes in higher education. How to maintain quality with reduced resources. Kogan Page, London 1992
- Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: Strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 2007; 29: 38–42
- Gwee M, Hoon T. Large-group teaching: Adding value and optimising educational outcomes. CDTL Brief 2001; 4: 10–12
- Johnson JT. Creating learner-centered classrooms: Use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education. J Dent Educ 2005; 69: 378–381
- Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Fam Med 2005; 37: 12–14
- Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Adv Physiol Educ 2006; 30: 159–167
- Michel M, Bischoff A, Jacobs K. Comparison of problem- and lecture-based pharmacology teaching. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2002; 23: 168–170
- Miller G. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990; 65: 563–567
- Miller RG, Ashar BH, Getz KJ. Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003; 23: 109–115
- Molgaard LK. Using a wireless response system to enhance student learning. J Vet Med Educ 2005; 32: 127–128
- Monahan CM, Yew AC. Adapting a case-based, cooperative learning strategy to a veterinary parasitology laboratory. J Vet Med Educ 2002; 29: 186–192
- Nayak L, Erinjeri JP. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 383–389
- Novotny MJ. A case-based approach to veterinary clinical pharmacology. JVet Med Educ 1998; 20: 50–52
- Plant JD. Incorporating an audience response system into veterinary dermatology lectures: Effect on student knowledge retention and satisfaction. J Vet Med Educ 2007; 34: 674–677
- Pradhan A, Sparano D, Ananth CV. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: An application to resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1827–1830
- Schackow TE, Chavez M, Loya L, Friedman M. Audience response system: Effect on learning in family medicine residents. Fam Med 2004; 36: 96–504
- Slain D, Abate M, Hodges B, Stamatakis M, Wolak S. An interactive response system to promote active learning in the doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ 2004; 68: 1–9
- Uhari M, Renko M, Soini H. Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures. BMC Med Educ 2003; 3: 12
- Wass V, Van der Vleuten CP, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001; 357: 945–949