Policy and attitude-related reasons for gender disparity in post allocation for graduate medical education in Austria

References

• Barondess JA. Specialization and the physician workforce: Drivers and determinants. JAMA 2000; 284: 1299–1301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bickel PJ, Hammel EA, O’Connell JW. Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley. Science 1975; 187: 398–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindal T, Wall D, Goodyear HM. Performance of paediatric Senior House Officers following changes in recruitment. Med Teach 2007; 20: 501–503
   Google Scholar
• Career Progress of Doctors Committee, British Medical Association. Recruitment and selection of doctors – guidelines for good practice. British Medical Association, London: BMA House, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton R, Sanderson K. Gendered job and social change. Unwin Hyman, London 1990
   Google Scholar
• Diehl AK, Kumar V, Gateley A, Appleby JL, O’Keefe ME. Predictors of final specialty choice by internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 1045–1049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisch, S. 2008. Faster and better: New medical curriculum [in German]. Österreichische Ärztezeitung 63:24–25. Available at: http://www.aerztezeitung.at/archiv/oeaez-17-10092008/approbation-nach-dem-medizinstudium.html. Accessibility verified July 7, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Gjerberg E. Medical women – towards integration? An analysis of the speciality choices made by two cohorts of Norwegian doctors. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 331–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerberg E. Gender similarities in doctors’ preferences – and gender differences in final specialisation. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 591–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorenflo DW, Ruffin MT, Sheets KJ. A multivariate model for speciality preference by medical students. J Fam Pract 1994; 39: 570–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhow R, Stewart T. Introduction to qualitative research and its application to stuttering. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2006; 41: 475–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson EE, Risberg G, Hamberg K, Westman G. Gender bias in female physician assessments. Women considered better suited for qualitative research. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002; 20: 79–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato Y, Mihara C, Matsuyama J, Ochi S, Ono H, Yamaguchi S, Kagawa R, Sanno N, Yanagawa N. Role of women in medicine: A look at the history, the present condition and the future status of women in the surgical field, especially neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47: 65–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence J, Poole P, Diener S. Critical factors in career decision making for women medical graduates. Med Educ 2003; 37: 319–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansdotter A, Lindholm L, Ohman A. Women, men and public health – how the choice of normative theory affects resource allocation. Health Policy 2004; 69: 351–364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marini M, Brinton M. Sex typing in socialisation. Sex segregation in workplace, B Reskin. National Teaching Press, Washington 1984
   Google Scholar
• Mayer AP, Files JA, Ko MG, Blair JE. Academic advancement of women in medicine: Do socialized gender differences have a role in mentoring?. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83: 204–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polachek SW. Occupational segregation: An alternative hypothesis. J Contemp Bus 1976; 5: 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Potee RA, Gerber AJ, Ickovics JR. Medicine and motherhood: Shifting trends among female physicians from 1922 to 1999. Acad Med 1999; 74: 911–919
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reskin B, Ross P. Job queues, gender queues. Temple University Press, Philadelphia 1990
   Google Scholar
• Rubeck RF, Donnelly MB, Jarecky RM, Murphy-Spencer AE, Harrell PL, Schwartz RW. Demographic, educational, and psychosocial factors influencing the choices of primary care and academic medical careers. Acad Med 1995; 70: 318–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz PW, Dittel EE, Firbas W, Sablik K. Austria. Medicine and medical education in Europe. The Eurodoctor, G Eysenbach. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York 1998; 80–99
   Google Scholar
• Smith CJ, Rodenhauser P, Markert R. Gender bias of Ohio physicians in the evaluation of the personal statements of residency applicants. Acad Med 1991; 66: 479–481
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soethout MB, Heymans MW, Cate OT. Career preference and medical students’ biographical characteristics and academic achievement. Med Teach 2008; 30: 15–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel W, Haoula D, Schneider B, Maier M. Allocation of training posts to applicants for postgraduate medical education in Austria: Survey and analysis. Acad Med 2004; 79: 703–710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiegel W, Pichlhöfer O, Haoula D, Schneider B, Maier M. Specialty selection and relative job satisfaction of family physicians and medical specialists in Austria. Croat Med J 2008; 48: 375–383
   Google Scholar
• The Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 76/207/EEC. The implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions. Official Journal 1976; L039: 40–42
   Google Scholar
• The Council of the European Communities. Council Directive 93/16/EEC. To facilitate the free movement of doctors and mutual recognition of their diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications. Official Journal 1993; 165: 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Vaglum P, Wiers-Jenssen J, Ekeberg O. Motivation for medical school: The relationship to gender and specialty preferences in a nationwide sample. Med Educ 1999; 33: 236–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Reis L. Causes and effects of a changed gender ratio in medicine. Med Teach 2004; 26: 506–509
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang-Cheng RM, Fulkerson PK, Barnas GP, Lawrence SL. Effect of student and preceptor gender on clinical grades in an ambulatory care clerkship. Acad Med 1995; 70: 324–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodrow SI, Gilmer-Hill H, Rutka JT. The neurosurgical workforce in North America: A critical review of gender issues. Neurosurgery 2006; 59: 749–755, discussion 755–758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 53–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuber MA. Fairness für weibliche Wissenschaftler und Ärzte – Lehren vom Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) [in German]. Deutsch Med Wochenschr 2001; 126: 59–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar