What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors? A Delphi survey of clinicians

References

• Akins R, Tolson H, Cole B, 2005. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: Application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol [online]; 5:37. Available from: <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/5/37>. Accessed 2009 May 5
   Google Scholar
• Albanese M, Snow M, Schochlak S, Hugget K, Farrell P. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 2003; 78: 149–158
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled agreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70: 213–220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Committee, Institute for International Medical Education. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education. Med Teach 2002; 24(2)130–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crewson P. Fundamentals of clinical research for radiologists: Reader agreement studies. Am J Roentgenol May, 2005; 184: 1391–1397
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GMC (General Medical Council) 1993, revised 2003. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: General Medical Council. <http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/>. Accessed 2009 Apr 20
   Google Scholar
• GMC (General Medical Council) 2006. Good Medical Practice: Regulating Doctors Ensuring Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council. <http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/>. Accessed 2009 Apr 20
   Google Scholar
• GMC (General Medical Council and Medical Schools Council) 2007. Medical Students: Professional Behaviour and Fitness to Practice. <http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/undergraduatepolicy/>. Accessed 2009 Apr 20
   Google Scholar
• GMC (General Medical Council) 2009. Tomorrow's Doctors. London: GgGeneral MmMedical CcCouncil 2009, <http://www.gmc-uk.org/education / >. (aAccessed 2009 April 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Greatorex J, Dexter T. An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32(4)1016–1024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greengross S. What patients want from their doctors. Choosing tomorrow's doctors, I Allen, P Brown, P Hughes. London Policy Institute, London 1997; 12–19
   Google Scholar
• Hardy D, O’Brien A, Gaskin C, O’Brien AJ, Morrison-Ngatai E, Skews G, Ryan T, McNulty N. Practical application of the Delphi technique in a bicultural mental health nursing study in New Zealand. J Adv Nurs 2004; 46(1)95–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris S, Owen C. Discerning quality: Using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ 2007; 41: 234–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holey E, Feeley J, Dixon J, Whittaker V, 2007. An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies, BMC Med Res Methodol [online]; 7:52. Available from: <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/>. Accessed 2009 May 5
   Google Scholar
• Hsu C, 2007. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. J Pract Assess Res Eval [online]; 12(10):4. <http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10>. Accessed 2009 May 5
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson S. Likert scales: How to abuse them. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1212–1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: Ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2006; 53(2)205–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSC (Medical Schools Council) 2006. Guiding Principles for the Admission of Medical Students, Medical Schools Council Publications and Guidance. <http://www.chms.ac.uk/publications.htm>. Accessed 2009 Apr 20
   Google Scholar
• MSC (Medical Schools Council) 2008. Consensus Statement, the Role of the Doctor: Past, Present and Future, Medical Schools Council Publications and Guidance. <http://www.chms.ac.uk/publications.htm>. Accessed 2009 Apr 20
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell D, Dobson A. General observer-agreement measures on individual subjects and groups of subjects. Biometrics 1984; 40: 973–983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry J, Mathers J, Stevens A, Parsons A, Lilford R, Spurgeon P, Thomas H. Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: Review. BMJ 2006; 332: 1005–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson F, Ferguson E. Selection for medical education and training. Association for the Study of Medical Education, Edinburgh 2007
   Google Scholar
• Pell G. Use and misuse of Likert scales in letters to the editor. Med Educ 2005; 39: 970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powis D. How to do it: Select medical students. BMJ 1998; 317: 1149–1150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter H, Eva K. Applied research: Reflecting the relative values of community, faculty, and students in the admissions tools of medical school. Teach Learn Med 2005; 17(1)4–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooke J. Aspiring to excellence: Final report of the independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. MMC Inquiry 2008, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Viera A, Garrett J. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005 2005; 37(5)360–363
   Google Scholar
• World Summit on Medical Education Communique. Med Educ 1994; 28(S1)1–3
   Google Scholar