A model teaching session for the hypothesis-driven physical examination

References

• Akaike M, Terashima Y, Mikasa H, Tani K, Izumi K, Fukui Y, 2008. Trial of advanced OSCE for evaluating medical record writing and presentation. Med Educ (Japan) 39: (suppl) 25
   Google Scholar
• Benbassat J, Baumal R, Heyman SN, Brezis M. Viewpoint: Suggestions for a shift in teaching clinical skills to medical students: The reflective clinical examination. Acad Med 2005; 80: 1121–1126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2217–2225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer, London 2008
   Google Scholar
• Crosby J. AMEE Medical Education Guide No 8. Learning in small groups. Med Teach 1996; 18: 189–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: One to one teaching and feedback. BMJ 2003; 326: 543–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in curriculum development: The SPICES model. Med Educ 1984; 18: 284–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Hart IR, Mayer JW, Felner JM, Petrusa ER, Waugh RA, Brown DD, Safford RR, Gessner IH, Gordon DL, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999; 282: 861–866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner B, Young L. Teaching medical students using role play: Twelve tips for successful role plays. Med Teach 2006; 28: 225–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi H, 2009. Hypothesis-driven physical examination. The workshop report. The 21st family medicine summer seminar for medical students and residents. Family medicine Japan report 69:4
   Google Scholar
• Kozu T. Medical education in Japan. Acad Med 2006; 81: 1069–1075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravetz RE. To touch or not to touch: That is the question. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2143–2144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusanagi K. Hypothesis-driven physical examination. The workshop report. The 20th family medicine summer seminar for medical students and residents. Family medicine Japan report 2008; 65: 7
   Google Scholar
• Mangione S, Peitzman SJ. Physical diagnosis in the 1990s. Art of artifact?. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 490–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda K, Nishigori H. Pre-conference workshop: Hypothesis-Driven Physical Examination. J Jpn Soc Gen Med 2008; 13: 92
   Google Scholar
• Masuda K, Nishigori H, Otaki J, Ban N, Bordage G. Hypothesis-Driven Physical Examination (HDPE) – learning physical examination with clinical reasoning – a qualitative study into curriculum evaluation for small-group learning for 5th-year medical students. Med Educ (Japan), 2007; 38(suppl): 73
   Google Scholar
• Mcgee S. Evidence based physical diagnosis, 2nd. Elsevier, St. Louis 2007
   Google Scholar
• Meyer J. Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ 2000; 320: 178–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert V, Verwijnen MG, Rikers R, Scherpbier AJ. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1044–1052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishigori H, Suzuki T, Mishima N, Yamamoto N. A model for attracting physicians to rural areas by improving residency training programs, part 1: Action research for evaluating a residency training program. Med Educ (Japan) 2009; 40: 19–25
   Google Scholar
• Outram S, Nair BR. Peer physical examination: Time to revisit?. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 274–276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajecki R. Breaking the ice. Simple steps help new residents feel welcomed. Contemp Longterm Care 1992; 15: 41–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramani S. Twelve tips for excellent physical examination teaching. Med Teach 2008; 30: 851–856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly BM. Physical examination in the care of medical inpatients: An observational study. Lancet 2003; 362: 1100–1105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudland JR. Learning in small groups. A practical guide for medical teachers, 3rd, J Dent, R Harden. Elsevier, Edingurgh 2009; 82
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart DE. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, RJ Spiro, B Bruce, WF Brewer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 1980; 33–58
   Google Scholar
• Simel D, Rennie D. The rational clinical examination: Evidence-based clinical diagnosis. McGraw-Hill, New York 2009
   Google Scholar
• Takamizawa K. Hypothesis-driven physical examination. Workshop report. The 19th family medicine summer seminar for medical students and residents. Family medicine Japan report 2007; 61: 5–6
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkowsky R, Downing S, Klamen D, Valaski M, Eulenberg B, Popa M. Assessing the head-to-toe physical examination skills of medical students. Med Teach 2004; 26: 415–419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkowsky R, Otaki J, Lowenstein T, Riddle J, Nishigori H, Bordage G. A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: Initial validity evidence. Med Educ 2009; 43: 729–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman H. Embracing ambiguities and valuing ourselves: Issues of validity in action research. J Adv Nurs 1998; 28: 101–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziv A. Simulators and simulation-based medical education. A practical guide for medical teachers, 3rd, J Dent, R Harden. Elsevier, Edinburgh 2009; 221
   Google Scholar