Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference

References

• Acosta D, Olsen P. Meeting the needs of regional minority groups: The University of Washington's programs to increase the American Indian and Alaskan native physician workforce. Acad Med 2006; 81: 863–870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese M, Snow M, Skochelak S, Huggett K, Farrell P. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 2003; 78: 313–321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: A new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ 2009; 43: 887–894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bore M, Munro D, Powis D. A comprehensive model for the selection of medical students. Med Teach 2009; 31: 1066–1072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr S. Emotional intelligence in medical students: Does it correlate with selection measures?. Med Educ 2009; 43: 1069–1077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates H. Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical Schools Admission Test (GAMSAT). Med Educ 2008; 42: 999–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Schotanus J, Muijtjens A, Reinders J, Agsteribbe J, van Rossum H, van der Vleuten C. The predictive validity of grade point average scores in a partial lottery medical school admission system. Med Educ 2006; 40: 1012–1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalley B, Podawiltz A, Castro R, Fallon K, Kott M, Rabek J, Richardson J, Thomson W, Ferry P, Mabry B, et al. The joint admission medical program: A statewide approach to expanding medical education and career opportunities for disadvantaged students. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1373–1382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didier T, Kreiter C, Buri R, Solow C. Investigating the utility of a GPA institutional adjustment index. Adv Health Sci Educ 2006; 11: 145–153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson M, Crotty B, Prideaux D, Carne R, Ward A, de Leeuw E. The multiple mini-interview: How long is enough?. Med Educ 2009; 43: 168–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnon T, Paolucci E, Violato C. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med 2007; 82: 100–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore K, Reiter H, Eva K, Krueger S, Scriven E, Siv E, Hilsden S, Thomas J, Norman G. Extending the interview to all medical school candidates – computer based-multiple sample evaluation of non-cognitive skills (CMSENS). Acad Med 2009; 84(10 Suppl.)S9–S12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva K, Reiter H, Rosenfeld J, Norman G. The relationship between interviewers’ characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Acad Med 2004a; 79: 602–609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva K, Reiter H, Trinh K, Wasi P, Rosenfeld J, Norman G. Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Med Educ 2009; 43: 767–775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva K, Rosenfeld J, Reiter H, Norman G. An admissions OSCE: The multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2004b; 18: 314–326
   Google Scholar
• Groves M, Gordon J, Ryan G. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: Is it time to re-think?. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 120–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister H, Lockyer J, Crutcher R. The multiple mini-interview for selection of international medical graduates into family medicine residency education. Med Educ 2009; 43: 573–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsman R, van der Ende J, Oort F, Michels R, Casteelen G, Griffioen F. Effectiveness of selection in medical schools admissions; evaluation of outcomes among freshmen. Med Educ 2007; 41: 369–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey S, Dowson S, Wall D, Diwakar V, Goodyear H. Multiple mini-interviews: Opinions of candidates and interviewers. Med Educ 2008; 42: 207–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D, Ferguson E, Powis D, Symonds I, Yates J. Graduate entry to medicine: Widening academic and socio-demographic access. Med Educ 2008; 42: 294–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D, Yates J, Nicholson S. Comparison of A level and UKCAT performance on students applying to UK medical and dental schools in 2006: Cohort study. BMJ 2010; 340: 44
   Google Scholar
• Julian E. Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting medical school performance. Acad Med 2005; 80: 910–917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knights J, Kennedy B. Medical school selection: Impact of dysfunctional tendencies on academic performance. Med Educ 2007; 41: 362–368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig J, Sireci S, Wiley A. Evaluating the predictive validity of MCAT scores across diverse applicant groups. Acad Med 1998; 73: 1095–1106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiter C. The use of constrained optimization to facilitate admission decisions. Acad Med 2002; 77: 148–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiter C, Kreiter Y. A validity generalization perspective on the ability of undergraduate GPA and the medical college admission test to predict important outcomes. Teach Learn Med 2007; 14(1)95–108
   Google Scholar
• Kreiter C, Yin P, Solow C, Brennan R. Investigating the reliability of the medical schools admissions interview. Adv Health Sci Educ 2004; 9: 147–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Roberts C, Rothnie I, du Fresne C, Walton M. Experiences of the multiple mini-interview: A qualitative analysis. Med Educ 2009; 43: 360–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeMay J-F, Lockyer J, Collin V, Brownwell K. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 2007; 41: 573–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Buyse T, Sackett P. The operational validity of a video-based situational judgement test for medical college admissions: Illustrating the importance of matching predictor and criterion construct domains. J Appl Psychol 2005; 90(3)442–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens F, Sackett P. Video-based versus written situational judgement tests: A comparison in terms of predictive validity. J Appl Psychol 2006; 91(5)1181–1188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsden M, Bore M, Millar K, Jack R, Powis D. Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school. Med Educ 2005; 39: 258–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch B, Mackenzie R, Dowell J, Cleland J, Prescott G. Does the UKCAT predict year 1 performance in medical school?. Med Educ 2009; 43: 1203–1209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus I, Smithers E, Partridge P, Keeling A, Fleming P. A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 years prospective study. BMJ 2003; 327: 139–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith K, Dunlap M, Baker H. Subjective and objective admission factors as predictors of clinical clerkship performance. J Med Educ 1982; 57: 743–751
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paolo A, Stites S, Bonaminio G, Cox G, Zeiger L, Meyer M, McCurdy S. A comparison of students from main and alternate admission lists at one school: The potential impact on study performance of increasing enrolment. Acad Med 2006; 81: 837–841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole A, Catano V, Cunningham D. Predicting performance in Canadian dental schools: The new CDA structured interview, a new personality assessment and the DAT. J Dent Educ 2007; 71(5)664–676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powis D. Personality testing in the context of selecting health professionals. Med Teach 2009; 31: 1045–1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powis D, Bore M, Munro D, Lumsden M. Development of the personal qualities assessment as a tool for selecting medical students. J Ad Cont Educ 2005; 11(1)3–14
   Google Scholar
• Powis D, James D, Ferguson E. Demographic and socio-economic associations with academic attainment (UCAS tariff scores) in applicants to medical school. Med Educ 2007; 41: 242–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price P, Lewis E, Loughmiller G, Nelson D, Murray S, Taylor C. Attributes of a good practising physician. J Med Educ 1971; 46: 229–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quintero A, Segal S, King T, Black K. The personal interview assessing the potential for personality similarity to bias the selection of orthopaedic residents. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1364–1372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razack S, Fareno S, Drolet F, Snell L, Wiseman J, Pickering J. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: Stakeholder acceptability comparisons. Med Educ 2009; 43: 993–1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves R, Vishwanatha J, Yorlo T, Budd M, Sheedlo H. The post-baccalaureate premedical certification program at the University of North Texas Health Science Center strengthens admission qualifications for entrance into medical school. Acad Med 2008; 83: 45–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehr G. Trends in medical education research. Acad Med 2004; 79: 939–947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter H, Eva K, Rosenfeld J, Norman G. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 2007; 41: 378–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter H, Maccoon K. A compromise method to facilitate under-represented minority admissions to medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007; 12: 223–237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reiter H, Salvatori P, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Eva K. The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews. Med Educ 2006; 40: 36–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I, Crossley J, Lyon P, Kumar K, Tiller D. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ 2008; 42: 396–404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C, Zoanetti N, Rothnie I. Validating a multiple mini-interview question bank assessing entry-level reasoning skills in candidates for graduate-entry medicine and dentistry programmes. Med Educ 2009; 43: 350–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld J, Reiter H, Trinh K, Eva K. A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews. Adv Health Sci Educ 2008; 13: 43–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvatori P. Reliability and validity of admission tools used to select students for the health professions. Adv Health Sci Educ 2001; 6: 159–175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stansfield R, Kreiter C. Conditional reliability of ratings: Extreme ratings are the most informative. Med Educ 2007; 41: 32–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinecke A, Beaudreau J, Bletzinger R, Terrell C. Race-neutral admission approaches: Challenges and opportunities for medical schools. Acad Med 2007; 82: 117–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg R. Assessing students for medical schools admissions: Is it time for a new approach?. Acad Med 2008; 83: S105–S110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekian A. Minority students, affirmative action and the admission process: A survey of 15 medical schools. Acad Med 1998a; 73: 986–992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekian A. Cognitive factors, attrition rates and underrepresented students; the problem of predicting future performance. Acad Med 1998b; 73: 538–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson W, Ferry P, King J, Martinez-Wedig C, Michael L. Increasing access to medical education for students from medically underserved communities: One program's success. Acad Med 2003; 78: 454–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson W, Ferry P, King J, Martinez-Wedig C, Villarreal G. A baccalaureate-MD program for students from medically underserved communities: 15-year outcomes. Acad Med 2010; 85: 668–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thordarson D, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio S, Schall S, Patzakis M. Resident selection: How are we doing and why?. Clin Orthop and Relat Res 2007; 459: 255–259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urlings-Strop L, Stijnen T, Themmen A, Splinter T. Selection of medical students: A controlled experiment. Med Educ 2009; 43: 175–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39: 309–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D, Zhang J, Byrne G, Luke H, Ozolins I, Parker M, Peterson R. Medical school selection criteria and the prediction of academic performance. Med J Aust 2000; 188: 349–354
   Google Scholar
• Ziv A, Rubin O, Moshinsky A, Gafni N, Kotler M, Dagan Y, Lichtenberg D, Mekori Y, Mittleman M. MOR: A simulation-based assessment centre for evaluating the personal and interpersonal qualities of medical school candidates. Med Educ 2008; 42: 991–998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar