References
- Bardes CL, Best PC, Kramer SJ, Deinstag JL. Medical school admissions and non-cognitive testing: Some open questions. Acad Med 2009; 84: 1360–1363
- Coates H. Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test (GAMSAT). Med Educ 2008; 42: 999–1006
- Donnon T, Paolucci EO, Violato C. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: A metaanalysis of the published research. Acad Med 2007; 82: 100–106
- Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter J, Norman GR. An admissions OSCE: A mini-multiple interview. Med Educ 2004; 38: 314–326
- Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: Systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002; 324: 952–957
- Ferguson E, Sanders A, O’Hehir F, James D. Predictive validity of personal statements and the role of the five factor model of personality in relation to medical training. J Occup Organ Psychol 2000; 73: 321–344
- Fernando N, Cleland JA, Greaves K, McKenzie H. Comparing the newly introduced UKCAT with the standardised admission selection process at a Scottish Medical School. Med Teach 2009; 31: 1018–1023
- Goho B, Blackman A. The effectiveness of academic admission interviews: An exploratory meta-analysis. Med Teach 2006; 28: 335–340
- James D, Chilvers C. Academic and non-academic predictors of success on the Nottingham undergraduate medical course 1970–95. Med Educ 2001; 35: 1056–1064
- James D, Driver L. Ethnic and sex differences in selection for admission to Nottingham University Medical School. BMJ 1999; 319: 351–352
- James D, Yates J, Nicholson S. Comparison of A level and UKCAT performance in students applying to UK medical and dental schools in 2006: Cohort study. BMJ 2010; 349: c478
- Lynch B, Mackenzie R, Prescott G, Cleland JA, Dowell J. Does the UKCAT predict first-year performance in medical school?. Med Educ 2009; 12: 1203–1209
- Macan TH, Avedon MJ, Paese M, Smith DE. The effects of applicants’ reactions to cognitive ability tests and assessment center. Personnel Psychol 1994; 47: 715–738
- McManus IC, Esmail A, Demetriou M. Factors affecting likelihood of applicants being offered a place in medical schools in the United Kingdom in 1996 and 1997: Retrospective study. Commentary: League tables will help. Commentary: Some legal aspects arising from the study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1111–1117
- McManus IC, Powis DA, Wakeford R, Ferguson E, James D, Richards P. Intellectual aptitude tests and A-levels for selecting UK school-leaver entrants for medical school. BMJ 2005; 331: 555–559
- McManus IC, Smithers E, Partridge P, Keeling A, Fleming PR. A-levels and intelligence as predictive of medical careers in UK doctors: 20-year prospective study. BMJ 2003; 327: 139–42
- Morris JG. The value and role of the interview in the student admissions process: A review. Med Teach 1999; 21: 473–481
- Murphy KR. When your top choice turns you down: Effect of rejected job offers on the utility of selection tests. Psychol Bull 1986; 99: 133–138
- Powis D, Hamilton J, McManus IC. Widening access by changing the criteria for selecting medical students. Med Educ 2007; 23: 1235–1245
- Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. Analysing qualitative data, A Bryman, R Burgess. Routledge, London 1994; 173–194
- Ryan AM, Ployhart RA. Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review. J Manag 2000; 26: 565–606
- Rynes SL, Connerley ML. Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures. J Bus Psychol 1993; 7: 261–277
- Smither JW, Reilly RR, Millsap RE, Pearlman K, Stoffey RW. Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychol 1993; 46: 49–77
- Steiner DD, Gilliland SW. Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the U.S. J Appl Psychol 1996; 81: 134–141
- Wiechmann D, Ryan AM. Reactions to computerized testing in selection contexts. Int J Select Assess 2003; 11: 215–229